| New Reply |
A little problem with charge operator |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jan4-13, 10:55 AM | #1 |
|
|
A little problem with charge operator
I have a problem where it's said that the operator Q is likely to be:
[itex]Q=\sum^3_{i=1}[\frac{1}{2}B_i + I_{3,i}][/itex] I have to apply this to the proton wave function which is the same as you can see in equation (3.20) here: https://www.google.es/url?sa=t&rct=j...uly9_EJcuTEWeQ I have only the formula for the first equal. If I apply it because B number is the same for all of them this contribution is 0 and applying the isospin I get also 0 so I have that <p|Q|p>=0 which I assume it's wrong because Q=1. What do I do wrong? Also, in this formula (3.20) how do they get the second equal? I mean the sum of this terms. I suppose all is about transpose operator but I'm getting quite confused with this. |
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| Jan4-13, 11:07 AM | #2 |
Recognitions:
|
You should get 1 both for "u up u down d up" and for "u up u up d down". They have to be the same (and the same as Q for the whole proton), otherwise the proton would not have a well-defined charge.
|
| Jan4-13, 11:26 AM | #3 |
|
|
mmm let me explain how I'm doing this. Let's take the last way of 3.20:
[itex]Q(|u\uparrow u\downarrow d\uparrow> -2|u\uparrow u\uparrow d\downarrow>)= \left[ \left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{2}\right)\right] -2 \left[ \left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{2}\right)\right](|u\uparrow u\downarrow d\uparrow> -2|u\uparrow u\uparrow d\downarrow>)=1-2=-1[/itex] So yes each part is 1 but because of -2 I get -1. Shouldn't be the result 1? |
| Jan4-13, 12:29 PM | #4 |
Recognitions:
|
A little problem with charge operator
You cannot subtract/multiply with prefactors like that.
Your "real" calculation is ##\langle \psi|Q|\psi \rangle##. If you expand this, each summand is evaluated independent of the others, and their prefactors are squared. As result, you get ##\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\cdot 1\right)^2 \cdot 1 + \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\cdot 2\right)^2 \cdot 1 = 1## where I corrected ##\sqrt{3} \to \sqrt{5}##. If you know that the proton has a well-defined charge, both components have to have the same charge, so you can ignore all prefactors and evaluate a single component only with the formula in post 1. |
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| charge, isospin, proton, q operator |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: A little problem with charge operator
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| How do we know generator of U(1) is operator of electric charge? | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 7 | ||
| point charge equilibrium w/ line charge problem | Advanced Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| Difference between charge, specific charge, relative charge and elimentary charge? | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 1 | ||
| Motivation for SU(2) x U(1) and charge operator | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 1 | ||
| Help linear operator problem | Introductory Physics Homework | 4 | ||