QM: Finite square well with V>0

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of bound states in a finite square well with a potential V > 0. It is noted that most examples only consider scattering states with E > 0, and the reason for this is that a potential V > 0 creates a square barrier, rather than a square well, where bound states do not exist. The difference between a well and a barrier is explained, and it is suggested that it is difficult to imagine a particle bound to a wall. The conversation ends with the question of whether the explanation for the absence of bound states lies in the fact that the energy E must always be larger than the minimum potential.
  • #1
Niles
1,866
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

When talking about the finite square well with a potential V > 0 for - A < x < A, I have never seen an example of bound states (i.e. E<0). They only treat examles with scattering states (i.e. E>0). Is there any reason for this? My book (Griffith's Intro. to QM) does not talk about this scenario.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If V>0, then this is not a square well, but a square barrier. Bound states do not exist in this situation.
 
  • #3
Ahh yes, barrier - not well! Why is that?
 
  • #4
A well is when V<0, so the particle can "fall in". A barrier is V>0, so there's an obstacle. I'm not sure about a formal proof, but it is hard to imagine a particle bound to a wall. Total energy must be negative somewhere if there is to be a bound state, but kinetic energy is always positive, plus positive potential = no bound state.
 
  • #5
Can one use the explanation that the energy E always has to be larger than the minimum potential?
 

1. What is a finite square well in quantum mechanics?

A finite square well in quantum mechanics is a potential energy barrier that has a finite width and a finite height. It is often represented by a step-like graph, with a flat region inside the well and a sudden drop in potential energy at the edges of the well.

2. How does the finite square well potential affect the behavior of particles?

The finite square well potential creates a region where the potential energy is greater than zero, which means that the particles are confined within the well. This confinement leads to quantized energy levels and affects the probability of finding particles within the well.

3. What is the difference between a finite square well with V>0 and V=0?

A finite square well with V>0 has a potential energy barrier, while a finite square well with V=0 has no potential energy barrier. This means that particles in a finite square well with V>0 are confined within the well, while particles in a finite square well with V=0 are not confined and can move freely.

4. How do the energy levels of a particle in a finite square well with V>0 compare to those in a finite square well with V=0?

The energy levels of a particle in a finite square well with V>0 are quantized, meaning they can only take on certain discrete values. In contrast, the energy levels in a finite square well with V=0 are continuous, meaning they can take on any value within a certain range.

5. Can a particle in a finite square well with V>0 escape from the well?

Yes, a particle in a finite square well with V>0 can escape from the well through a process called tunneling. This phenomenon occurs when the particle has insufficient energy to overcome the potential barrier, but still has a non-zero probability of appearing on the other side of the barrier.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
968
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
471
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top