Can AxB be equal to the empty set if either A or B is empty?

In summary, if either A or B is empty, then AxB=\oslash by definition. To prove this by contradiction, assume A is the empty set and B is any set. Then, if AxB is not empty, there must be an element (a,b) in the product. However, since A is empty, there is no element a, which contradicts the assumption that (a,b) is an element of AxB. Therefore, AxB must be empty.
  • #1
kathrynag
598
0

Homework Statement


I just need to decide how to show this by contradiction.
If either A or B is the empty set then AxB=[tex]\oslash[/tex].



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Here is how I started:
Assume either A or B is the empty set and AxB[tex]\neq[/tex][tex]\oslash[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Reasonable start. What would [tex] A \times B \ne \emptyset [/tex] mean?
 
  • #3
Is that the correct way to do a proof by contradiciton?
AxB is defined as the set consisting of all ordered pairs (x,y) in which x is an element of A and y is an element of B. So, x and y exist?
 
  • #4
Close: if you assume [tex] A \times B \ne \emptyset[/tex], there must be at least
one element [tex] (a,b) \in A \times B [/tex]. If you think about the definition of cartesian products, this will lead to a contradiction - about what? (Hint: what did you assume about [tex] A \text{ and } B [/tex]?)
 
  • #5
Ok here's my idea for the proof.
Let A = null set and B be arbitrary. Then AxB= null set because of the definition of AxB. But there is no x which is an element of A. Therefore AxB=null set. Thus, contradiciton.
 
  • #6
No - you can't assume [tex] A \times B = \emptyset [/tex] and try to proceed with a proof by contradiction.

Assume [tex] A= \emptyset [/tex] ([tex] B [/tex] may or may not be empty: that is unimiportant).

If [tex] A \times B \ne \emptyset [/tex], then (by definition of the Cartesian Product and non-empty set)
you can find an element of the product, say [tex] (a,b) \in A \times B [/tex].

This means [tex] b \in B [/tex]. From where do you get the object [tex] a [/tex]?
Answering the second question gives the contradiction.
 
  • #7
a is an element of A.
Oh, but then that mean A is nonempt and this a contradicition?
 
  • #8
"a is an element of A.
Oh, but then that mean A is nonempt and this a contradicition?"

:smile: - yup - it contradicts [tex] A = \emptyset [/tex]
 

What is "Proof By Contradiction"?

"Proof By Contradiction" is a method of mathematical proof that involves assuming the opposite of what you are trying to prove, and then showing that this assumption leads to a contradiction. This contradiction then proves that the original statement must be true.

How does "Proof By Contradiction" work?

First, you assume the opposite of what you are trying to prove. Then, using logical deductions and mathematical principles, you show that this assumption leads to a contradiction. This proves that the original statement must be true.

Why is "Proof By Contradiction" a useful method of proof?

"Proof By Contradiction" is a useful method of proof because it allows you to prove a statement without directly showing its truth. It also helps to identify and eliminate false assumptions, making the proof more rigorous and reliable.

What types of statements are best suited for "Proof By Contradiction"?

"Proof By Contradiction" is best suited for statements that are difficult to prove directly or for statements where a direct proof would be very long and complex. It is also useful for proving statements that involve the negation of a statement.

Are there any limitations to "Proof By Contradiction"?

One limitation of "Proof By Contradiction" is that it does not always work for every statement. Some statements may require a different method of proof. Additionally, it may not provide much insight or understanding into why a statement is true.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
97
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
783
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
495
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
539
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
6K
Back
Top