Classifying electron orbitals by nodes

In summary, electrons in an atom follow the Schrodinger equation and are described by solutions in the form of R(r)Θ(θ)Φ(φ) where r, θ, and φ are spherical coordinates. These "orbitals" can be visualized based on their nodes, which divide space into different regions. The total number of nodes is determined by the principal quantum number (n) and the magnetic quantum number (m) corresponds to the number of values for which Φ(φ) = 0. The orbital quantum number minus the magnetic quantum number (l-m) determines the number of conical nodes. The number of spherical nodes is determined by n-l-1. The total number of nodes and regions
  • #1
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,839
258
(is this correct … ?)

electrons "orbiting" a single atom obey the Schrodinger equation, whose solutions are linear combinations of an orthogonal basis of solutions of the form R(r)Θ(θ)Φ(φ)

where r θ and φ are the usual spherical coordinates: θ = 0 is the usual z axis

these "orbitals" can be visualised most easily according to the numbers of their nodes (strictly, nodal surfaces, ie the surfaces along which they are zero): n-1 m and l-m

i shall use "sector" to refer to a region (other than a sphere) extending to infinity without any hole, "collar" to refer to a region (other than a sphere) extending to infinity with one hole, and "spherical zone" to refer to a sphere or a spherical shell

Θ(θ)Φ(φ) is also written Ylm(θ,φ)

R(r) is a Laguerre polynomial of order n-l-1 (with n-l-1 roots) times a negative exponential factor, times rl


n = total nodes + 1 (principal quantum number):

the total number of nodes is called n-1

m = plane nodes (magnetic quantum number):

Φ(φ) has nodes with φ = constant

so Φ(φ) only has plane nodes, all through the principal (z) axis

they divide space into 2m equal "vertical" sectors

m is the number of values of φ for which F(φ) = 0

l-m = conical nodes (orbital quantum number minus magnetic quantum number):

Θ(θ) has nodes with θ = constant

so Θ(θ) only has conical nodes, all with axes along the principal (z) axis

they divide space into l-m+1 cylindrically symmetric regions: two sectors and l-m-1 collars

we have to count each cone as two nodes, except the "flat cone" (along the "equatorial plane", θ = π/2), which we count as one node … this is because each cone (except the "flat cone") corresponds to two values of θ

diagrams such as this show the intersections of the nodes with a sphere as circles of latitude … unfortunately, although correct, this obscures the conical nature of the nodes!

l-m is the number of values of θ for which P(θ) = 0


n-l-1 = spherical nodes

R(r) has nodes with r = constant

so R(r) only has spherical nodes

they divide space into n-l regions

n-l-1 is the number of values of r for which R(r) = 0

total nodes and regions:

by adding, or multiplying, the above numbers …

the total number of nodes is m + (l-m) + (n - l - 1) = n-1

the total number of regions is 2m(l-m+1)(n - l)

this is the number of "blobs" shown in diagrams of orbitals

in those diagrams, each "blob" represents a region in which the electron is likely to be: since it cannot be at a node, the "blobs" must fit between the nodes

special cases:

l = m = 0 (the s orbitals): there are n-1 spherical nodes …

the electron is likely to be in a sphere round the centre, or in one of n-2 spherical shells

this is the only case where the origin is not on a node (because all other types of node are planes or cones through the centre), and therefore is the only case in which the electron is likely to be near the centre​

l = 1 (the p orbitals): there is one plane node, and n-2 spherical nodes

this is because m and l-m can only be 0 or 1, so there are m "vertical" plane nodes and l-m conical nodes, ie 1"vertical" plane node and 0 conical nodes or 0 "vertical" plane nodes and 1 conical node (the "flat" cone, so it actually is another plane!)

the electron is likely to be on either side of a plane, in one of n-1 spherical zones

l = 2 (the d orbitals): there are two perpendicular plane nodes (m = 2 or 1), or one ("genuine", non-"flat") conical node (m = 0), and n-3 spherical nodes

the electron is likely to be in one of four parallel sectors, or in one of two sectors and a collar separating them, divided into n-3 spherical zones

l = 3 (the f orbitals): there are three plane nodes at 60° (m = 3), or three perpendicular plane nodes (m = 2), or one plane node and one ("genuine", non-"flat") conical node (m = 1), or two (one "genuine", and one "flat") conical nodes (m = 0), and n-4 spherical nodes

the electron is likely to be in one of six parallel sectors, or in one of 8 "octahedral" sectors, or in one of 6 sectors in "asterisk" configuration, or in one of two sectors and two collars separating them, divided into n-3 spherical zones

l = 4 (the g orbitals): there are four plane nodes at 45° (m = 4), or three plane nodes at 60° and one perpendicular plane node (m = 3), or two perpendicular plane nodes and one ("genuine", non-"flat") conical node (m = 2), or one plane node and two (one "genuine", and one "flat") conical nodes (m = 1), or two ("genuine", non-"flat") conical nodes (m = 0), and n-5 spherical nodes

and so on …

here, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_harmonics, is a diagram of the orbitals for l = n-1 = 0 to 3 (click for a larger version) …
300px-Harmoniki.png

… for l < n-1, each region shown must be divided into n-l-1 regions by n-l-2 invisible spheres: see http://chemlinks.beloit.edu/Stars/pages/orbitals.html for a diagram: as you go along each row, each region (yes, including the collar) is further divided

(see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital)

remember that these diagrams show contours inside which there is a (say) 90% probability of finding the electron: the electron can be found outside the regions shown, and indeed anywhere except on the actual nodes
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Orbitals with a fixed magnetic quantum number m are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian also when the rotational degeneracy is split by an applied magnetic field along the z axis. That's why it is called "magnetic" quantum number. However, these eigenstates are complex orbitals which have no plane nodes. The real orbitals you are describing are superpositions of two complex orbitals with +|m| and -|m|. Hence the real orbitals are labeled by |m| rather than by m. Furthermore as long as m not equal 0 there are two real orbitals with the same |m|, e.g. p_x and p_y, d_{xz} and d_{yz} (with |m|=1) or d_{xy} and d_{x^2-y^2} (with |m|=2).
 
  • #3
tiny-tim said:
(is this correct … ?)
here, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_harmonics, is a diagram of the orbitals for l = n-1 = 0 to 3 (click for a larger version) …


I can't see any difference in the orbitals on the left and the ones on the right. They should be rotated against each other.
 
  • #4
Hi DrDu! :smile:

Thanks for your help. :smile:

Yes, I've oversimplified by not using |m|, and ignoring the complex nature of the solutions. :redface:

I'll put the (hopefully :blushing:) corrected version in the next post.
DrDu said:
I can't see any difference in the orbitals on the left and the ones on the right. They should be rotated against each other.

ah, they are … the red and green colours are interchanged, indicating a relative rotation :wink:

i find it difficult to imagine the correct description of the orbitals in the complex (non-zero magnetic field) case

how would i complete this sentence? :confused:

"these diagrams show the probabilities (or amplitudes) in a zero magnetic field: in a non-zero magnetic field, the probabilities are found by combining … … … … "​
 
Last edited:
  • #5
(is this correct … ?)

electrons "orbiting" a single atom obey the Schrodinger equation, whose solutions are linear combinations of an orthogonal basis of complex solutions of the form eimφ times a real function R(r)Θlm(cosθ)

where r θ and φ are the usual spherical coordinates: θ = 0 is the usual z axis

the real parts of these "orbitals" can be visualised most easily according to the numbers of their nodes (strictly, nodal surfaces, ie the surfaces along which they are zero): n-1 |m| and l-|m|

i shall use "sector" to refer to a region (other than a sphere) extending to infinity without any hole, "collar" to refer to a region (other than a sphere) extending to infinity with one hole, and "spherical zone" to refer to a sphere or a spherical shell

R(r) is a Laguerre polynomial of order n-l-1 (with n-l-1 roots) times a negative exponential factor, times rl

Θlm(x) is a multiple of the associated Legendre polynomial Plm(x), a polynomial of degree l in x and/or √(1 - x2) … so Plm(cosθ) is a polynomial of degree l in cosθ and sinθ

Plm is a multiple of Pl-m, and so the complex orbitals eimφR(r)Θlm (for -l ≤ m ≤ l) can be visualised in terms of the shapes of the real and imaginary parts of eimφR(r)Θl|m| (for 0 ≤ m ≤ l) …

these are the shapes that are shown in diagrams! :wink:

n = total nodes + 1 (principal quantum number):

the total number of nodes is called n-1

|m| = plane nodes (m = magnetic quantum number):

Re(eimφ) and Im(eimφ) have nodes with φ = constant …

obviously, they are |m| "vertical" plane nodes (through the principal (z) axis),

and they divide space into 2|m| equal "vertical" sectors

l-|m| = conical nodes (l = orbital quantum number):

Θlm(cosθ) has nodes with θ = constant

so Θlm(cosθ) only has conical nodes, all with axes along the principal (z) axis

they divide space into l-|m|+1 cylindrically symmetric regions: two sectors and l-|m|-1 collars

we have to count each cone as two nodes, except the "flat cone" (along the "equatorial plane", θ = π/2), which we count as one node … this is because each cone (except the "flat cone") corresponds to two values of θ

diagrams such as this show the intersections of the nodes with a sphere as circles of latitude … unfortunately, although correct, this obscures the conical nature of the nodes!

l-|m| is the number of values of θ for which Θlm(cosθ) = 0


n-l-1 = spherical nodes

R(r) has nodes with r = constant

so R(r) only has spherical nodes

they divide space into n-l regions

n-l-1 is the number of values of r for which R(r) = 0

total nodes and regions:

by adding, or multiplying, the above numbers …

the total number of nodes is |m| + (l-|m|) + (n - l - 1) = n-1

the total number of regions is 2|m|(l-|m|+1)(n - l)

this is the number of "blobs" shown in diagrams of orbitals

in those diagrams, each "blob" represents a region in which the electron is likely to be: since it cannot be at a node, the "blobs" must fit between the nodes

special cases:

l = m = 0 (the s orbitals): there are n-1 spherical nodes …

the electron is likely to be in a sphere round the centre, or in one of n-2 spherical shells

this is the only case where the origin is not on a node (because all other types of node are planes or cones through the centre), and therefore is the only case in which the electron is likely to be near the centre​

l = 1 (the p orbitals): there is one plane node, and n-2 spherical nodes

this is because |m| and l-|m| can only be 0 or 1, so there are |m| "vertical" plane nodes and l-|m| conical nodes, ie 1 "vertical" plane node and 0 conical nodes or 0 "vertical" plane nodes and 1 conical node (the "flat" cone, so it actually is another plane!)

the electron is likely to be on either side of a plane, in one of n-1 spherical zones

l = 2 (the d orbitals): there are two perpendicular plane nodes (m = ±2 or ±1), or one ("genuine", non-"flat") conical node (m = 0), and n-3 spherical nodes

the electron is likely to be in one of four parallel sectors, or in one of two sectors and a collar separating them, divided into n-3 spherical zones

l = 3 (the f orbitals): there are three plane nodes at 60° (m = ±3), or three perpendicular plane nodes (m = ±2), or one plane node and one ("genuine", non-"flat") conical node (m = ±1), or two (one "genuine", and one "flat") conical nodes (m = 0), and n-4 spherical nodes

the electron is likely to be in one of six parallel sectors, or in one of 8 "octahedral" sectors, or in one of 6 sectors in "asterisk" configuration, or in one of two sectors and two collars separating them, divided into n-3 spherical zones

l = 4 (the g orbitals): there are four plane nodes at 45° (m = ±4), or three plane nodes at 60° and one perpendicular plane node (m = ±3), or two perpendicular plane nodes and one ("genuine", non-"flat") conical node (m = ±2), or one plane node and two (one "genuine", and one "flat") conical nodes (m = ±1), or two ("genuine", non-"flat") conical nodes (m = 0), and n-5 spherical nodes

and so on …

here, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_harmonics, is a diagram of the orbitals for l = n-1 = 0 to 3 (click for a larger version) …
300px-Harmoniki.png

… for l < n-1, each region shown must be divided into n-l-1 regions by n-l-2 invisible spheres: see http://chemlinks.beloit.edu/Stars/pages/orbitals.html for a diagram: as you go along each row, each region (yes, including the collar) is further divided

(see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital)

remember that these diagrams show contours inside which there is a (say) 90% probability of finding the electron: the electron can be found outside the regions shown, and indeed anywhere except on the actual nodes
 

1. What are electron orbitals?

Electron orbitals are regions of space around an atom where electrons are most likely to be found. They describe the 3D probability distribution of an electron's location.

2. How are electron orbitals classified by nodes?

Electron orbitals are classified by the number of nodes they have. A node is a point in space where the probability of finding an electron is zero. The number of nodes corresponds to the energy level of the orbital.

3. What is the significance of nodes in electron orbitals?

Nodes in electron orbitals represent points of zero electron density, indicating that the probability of finding an electron at that location is zero. They also correspond to energy levels, with higher energy orbitals having more nodes.

4. How do the shapes of electron orbitals differ based on the number of nodes?

The number of nodes in an electron orbital determines its shape. Orbitals with zero nodes, such as s-orbitals, are spherical in shape. Orbitals with one node, such as p-orbitals, have a dumbbell shape. Orbitals with two or more nodes, such as d and f orbitals, have more complex shapes.

5. How does classifying electron orbitals by nodes relate to the periodic table?

The number of nodes in an electron orbital relates to its energy level, which in turn relates to the position of the element on the periodic table. Elements in the same group have similar electron configurations, meaning they have the same number of nodes in their electron orbitals.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
864
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
799
Back
Top