Could a Variable Speed of Light Theory Challenge the FLRW Metric in Cosmology?

  • Thread starter anorlunda
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the idea of a variable speed of light and its implications. It is suggested that this concept is not compatible with established theories and principles such as conservation of energy and Lorentz invariance. Additionally, it is mentioned that this theory would require a redefinition of the meter and could have significant impacts on our understanding of gravity and physics as a whole.
  • #1
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
11,308
8,732
Suppose we postulate that instead of the universe expanding, the speed of light was decreasing? Now we try to derive the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) metric from Newtonian conservation of energy. Would we get the same result?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
You would need some way to contract gravitationally bound objects at the same time, otherwise we could measure this slowed speed of light.
And if you do that, you just redefine the length of a meter. This is possible, of course, but you get nothing new. I don't see how you plan to use Newtonian conservation of energy.
 
  • #3
Variable speed of light theories are plagued by a number of issues. It does not play well with any number of theories that incorporate c in their formulation - like the nuclear fine structure constant. It unavoidably breaks Lorentz, diffeomorphism and time translational invariance, implying a violation of energy conservation. And plays strangely with gravity, suggesting both gravity and its propogation speed must also vary to avoid conflicts with well established observational evidence. It's not that such a thing is not possible, but, would have far reaching consequences for GR and much of physics.
 

1. What is FLRW theory and how is it related to cosmology?

FLRW (Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker) theory is a mathematical framework used to describe the large-scale structure of the universe. It is based on the principle of homogeneity and isotropy, meaning that the universe looks the same in all directions and at all points in time. FLRW theory is an important tool in cosmology as it helps us understand the expansion and evolution of the universe.

2. How is FLRW theory derived?

FLRW theory is derived from the Einstein field equations, which describe the relationship between the curvature of space-time and the distribution of matter and energy. By assuming a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the equations can be simplified to produce the FLRW metric, which describes the geometry of the universe.

3. Can we get FLRW theory another way?

Yes, there are other ways to derive FLRW theory. One approach is through the study of the cosmic microwave background radiation, which provides evidence for the homogeneity and isotropy of the universe. Another way is through observational data, such as the redshift of galaxies and the cosmic distance ladder, which provide evidence for the expansion of the universe.

4. What are the implications of FLRW theory?

FLRW theory has several implications for our understanding of the universe. It suggests that the universe is expanding, and that this expansion is accelerating due to the presence of dark energy. It also implies that the universe has no center or edge, and that the distribution of matter and energy is homogeneous on large scales.

5. Are there any limitations to FLRW theory?

While FLRW theory has been successful in explaining many observational data, it is not a complete description of the universe. It does not account for the presence of dark matter, which is thought to make up a large portion of the universe's mass. It also does not account for the effects of gravity on small scales, which require the use of general relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
963
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top