Finding charges in a pendulum in equilibrium

In summary: You only need to draw the right one at the end. As you gain confidence with the more abstract approach you will get the hang of which triangle to draw pretty reliably.
  • #1
Zayin
4
0
(solved) Finding charges in a pendulum in equilibrium

Homework Statement



Two small metallic spheres, each of mass 0.20 g, are suspended as pendulums by light strings from a common point. The spheres are given the same electric charge, and it is found that the two come to equilibrium when each string is at an angle of 5.0° with the vertical. If each string is 30.0 cm long, what is the magnitude of the charge on each sphere?


Homework Equations



[tex]F = k \ \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2} \ \mbox{ or } \ \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \ \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}[/tex]
[tex]\begin{equation*} \begin{split}
\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} = k & = & & 8.988 \times 10^9 \ N \cdot m^2 / C^2 \\ \\
\end{split} \end{equation*}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Finding the horizontal distance between the two spheres to give r:
1. An isosceles triangle is formed with the two strings, so the base angles are the same.
2. Therefore, the base angles are ((180-2×5)/2) = 85°.
3. Using the sine rule, r = 0.3×sin(2×5)/sin(85).

Finding the force of gravity that is acting horizontally on the two spheres to bring them to the vertical, which gives us F:
1. Treating the 30 cm strings as radii of a circle with centre from the common point, and the spheres as points on the circle, a straight line tangent to a sphere intersects the vertical.
2. The angle from one of the spheres to the other sphere and then to where the tangent intersects the vertical is thus 5° (radii are perpendicular to a tangent, adjacent angles).
3. Therefore, right angle trigonometry tells us that the force of gravity acting horizontally on a sphere is mg/tan(5) = 0.196/tan(5).

q_1 = q_2 (given)

So:[tex]F = k \ \frac{q^2}{r^2}[/tex]
Therefore,[tex]q = \sqrt{\frac{Fr^2}{k}}[/tex]

And when I sub my values in I get q = 8.3 x 10^-7 C, which is apparently incorrect, the correct answer being 7.2 x 10^-9 C. Help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Zayin said:
Finding the horizontal distance between the two spheres to give r:
1. An isosceles triangle is formed with the two strings, so the base angles are the same.
2. Therefore, the base angles are ((180-2×5)/2) = 85°.
3. Using the sine rule, r = 0.3×sin(2×5)/sin(85).
Good thinking.
Best to keep symbols as long as possible though. Helps with troubleshooting.
Finding the force of gravity that is acting horizontally on the two spheres to bring them to the vertical, which gives us F:
I'm sorry - what? Gravity is not horizontal - from the following, you mean tangential?
1. Treating the 30 cm strings as radii of a circle with centre from the common point, and the spheres as points on the circle, a straight line tangent to a sphere intersects the vertical.
2. The angle from one of the spheres to the other sphere and then to where the tangent intersects the vertical is thus 5° (radii are perpendicular to a tangent, adjacent angles).
3. Therefore, right angle trigonometry tells us that the force of gravity acting horizontally on a sphere is mg/tan(5) = 0.196/tan(5).
If I'm reading you right you are finding the component of a component here but you only have one trig factor.

I think you have over-complicated this - what is wrong with drawing a free-body diagram for each mass and summing the forces to zero?
(Put y-axis along the tension.)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
It would be easier to find r by using a single right-angle triangle.
Then r = 2Lsinθ, (where L is the string length).

In all problems like this, it's always best to start with a free-body diagram, ( you only need to do this for 1 sphere because of symmetry ). I would put the y-axis along the direction of the weight.
This gives 2 equations allowing you to eliminate the string tension and leaving the charge as the only unknown.
As Simon Bridge says, you are making this more complicated than you have to.
 
  • #4
I would put the y-axis along the direction of the weight.
That would be traditional ("y=up/down" and all that)... however, if you put the y-axis along the string, you don't need to eliminate the tension :) But the cost is that you have two vectors to resolve instead of one ... play to your strengths.
 
  • #5
ap123 said:
It would be easier to find r by using a single right-angle triangle.
Then r = 2Lsinθ, (where L is the string length).
Heh heh. I know, but using the sine rule makes me feel fancy. :<

Simon Bridge said:
what is wrong with drawing a free-body diagram for each mass and summing the forces to zero?
(Put y-axis along the tension.)
So I did this, and solved along the x axis:

[tex]\begin{equation*} \begin{split}
k \ \frac{q^2}{r^2}cos5° - mgsin5° & = & & 0 \\

∴ kq^2cos5° & = & & r^2mgsin5° \\

∴ q & = & & \sqrt{\frac{r^2mgsin5°}{kcos5°}} \\

& = & & \sqrt{\frac{\frac{0.3sin10°}{sin85°}^2×0.196×sin5°}{8.988\times 10^9×cos5°}} \\

& = & & 7.2\times 10^{-8} \ C \\

\end{split} \end{equation*}[/tex]
But... the answer is supposedly 7.2 x 10^-9 C.

I can't seem to find the missing 10^-1. Am I overlooking it, or is the answer provided simply incorrect?

Thanks so much for your help!
 
  • #6
Remember that the mass given is 0.2 grams, so mg=0.00196, not 0.196
 
  • #7
*headdesk*

Thanks.
 
  • #8
Nice to see people using LaTeX though - kudos.
Just a tip: to get the trig to format correctly you should put a "\" in front of it ... because ##kq^2\cos(5^\circ)## reads better than ##kq^2cos(5^\circ)## ... technically units should be in normal, rather than italic, text ... which you can do, in math-mode, with the \text{} so 15m/s will be ##15\text{ms}^{-1}## rather than ##15ms^{-1}## ... but it is still much nicer than trying to format in plain text innit?

On your math - the other thing to try was to realize that the sum of the force vectors being zero means that the tension (T), gravity (mg), and coulomb force (F) vectors, form a right-angle triangle with the tension on the hypotenuse, and the half-apex angle (##\alpha =5^\circ##) is between mg and T. In which case, ##F=mg\tan(\alpha)## right off ... from there you can see where you originally made your mistake.

The power in the fbd method is that it does not rely on you drawing the right triangle right at the start.
 

1. How do you calculate the charge in a pendulum in equilibrium?

The charge in a pendulum in equilibrium can be calculated by using the equation Q = mgL/2π, where Q is the charge, m is the mass of the pendulum, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and L is the length of the pendulum.

2. What is the significance of finding the charge in a pendulum in equilibrium?

Finding the charge in a pendulum in equilibrium can help understand the behavior of charged particles in a magnetic field. It also allows for the calculation of other variables, such as the strength of the magnetic field or the velocity of the particle.

3. Can the charge in a pendulum in equilibrium be negative?

Yes, the charge in a pendulum in equilibrium can be negative. This indicates that the particle in the pendulum has a negative charge and is moving in the opposite direction of the magnetic field.

4. What factors affect the charge in a pendulum in equilibrium?

The charge in a pendulum in equilibrium is affected by the mass of the particle, the strength of the magnetic field, and the length of the pendulum. It is also dependent on the angle at which the pendulum is suspended and the velocity of the particle.

5. How does the charge in a pendulum in equilibrium change if the mass of the particle is increased?

If the mass of the particle in a pendulum in equilibrium is increased, the charge will also increase. This is because the mass is directly proportional to the charge in the equation Q = mgL/2π. As the mass increases, so does the charge required to maintain equilibrium.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
697
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
697
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
664
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
684
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top