- #1
moe darklight
- 409
- 0
Usually when arguing with a creationist, it always comes to Mt. St. Helens (a volcano that erupted 20 years ago, yet inspection of the lava would assume that it is almost a million years old)... I'm sure you've heard of it (if not it's on pretty much every creationist website).
they also argue that fossils can be created pretty quickly and dated to more than they actually are, radiometry is not to be trusted etc.
I don't know enough about this subject to have a counter argument and haven't found any website that explains mt. st helens, the internet is flooded with the creationist point of view.
(maybe this would go in the Earth sciences section?)
anyway, what should I look into, and how is mt st helens explainable?
thanks
they also argue that fossils can be created pretty quickly and dated to more than they actually are, radiometry is not to be trusted etc.
I don't know enough about this subject to have a counter argument and haven't found any website that explains mt. st helens, the internet is flooded with the creationist point of view.
(maybe this would go in the Earth sciences section?)
anyway, what should I look into, and how is mt st helens explainable?
thanks