Hydraulic power for a 1000 pound car for city driving

In summary: The car was designed for city driving and had a 45 MPH speed limit. The car was also very easy to drive, as it featured a one-speed transmission. There was no clutch or gears, just a lever that you turned to select the gear you wanted. The car also had limited slip differentials front and rear, which helped with traction. The car had a 14 inch tire and a 1.5 foot effective radius. The car weighed just 1,500 pounds and could travel up to 25 miles per hour.
  • #1
H012
153
7
I want to build a 1000 pound car for city driving with a 45 MPH limit. This totally something I want to do.just to say I can. But I'm a machinist with only basic engineering knowledge. My power plant will be a 16 HP OHV gas engine
driving a 1800 psi pump coupled to a Bi-directional hydraulic motor rated at 300 FtLbs.of torque at 400 RPM, This is of course a low RPM high torque motor. I will be running a rear wheel drive straight axle with a limited slip coupling No transmission. My question is what should my gearing be from the Hydraulic motor to my axle. If I left Anything out to help figure this I'm sorry.
Thanks'
Ray Mills
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
You need the effective radius of the tires (there's some deformation slightly reducing the effective radius from the actual radius). 45 mph = 66 ft / sec, and with a 1 foot effective radius, that's 6.283 ft / revolution which translates into about 630 rpm. You need a huge tire with a 1.576 foot radius to achieve 45 mph at 400 rpm. (assuming my math is correct here).
 
  • #3
Thanks for getting back. Maybe I didn't explain right. The hydraulic motor RPM is 400. My tire size would be a standard 14 inch tire
I thought I had included this My mistake. I would need to know what gear size for the hydraulic motor and the 2 inch axle. and 14 inch tire. Hope I said it correctly.
 
  • #4
Hydraulics are inefficient in this application. Electricity is more efficient, easier to regenerate and to control.

With hydraulics there will be a loss of about 20% at each stage, you will need to factor that into the calculations. 80% pump * 80% motor = 64%. You will need a hydraulic fluid cooler to radiate the wasted 36%.

It would help to know your selected hydraulic pump and motor capacities in millilitre per revolution. That determines the effective hydraulic shaft ratio. You can eliminate all gearing by selecting the right capacity ratio.

If you were to use a combination such as a self regulating constant pressure pump and an adjustable capacity, (swash plate?), motor, you would not need any gas engine speed control.
 
  • #5
This http://www.summitracing.com/expertadviceandnews/calcsandtools/gear-ratio-calculator will give you the pinion rpm.
 
  • #6
Well,

a 185/60R14 tire has circumference of 71.44 inches. Call it six feet - so it'll go about six feet per revolution.
http://mcgrefer.com/sizeinfo/1856514
185/65 has circumference of 73.72 inches which would allow for the flattening at bottom as pointed out by rcgldr.
http://mcgrefer.com/sizeinfo/1856014

6feet/rev X 400rev/min = 2400 feet/minute = 27.27 miles per hour

to make 45 miles per hour you'd have to increase wheel RPM by factor 45/27.27 = 1.65 to 1.
That's the gear ratio you'd need, 1 turn of hydraulic motor gives 1.65 turns of wheel.

In the late 1970's a guy in Burnsville Minnesota built such a car as you describe.
He used a single rear wheel for simplicity. That also let owners in many states register it as a motor-driven cycle which was cheaper.
His drive train was a one cylinder aircooled Tecumseh engine with variable sheave pulleys for infinitely variable transmission. Nowadays there's a lot of those around surplus thanks to snowmobiles and ATV's. He offered a diesel but it wasn't cost effective given the gas version delivered 100mpg.

I saw one once in Miami - but down there with no airconditioning they didnt catch on.

The HMV Free-Way Micro Car

Tough times often produce alternative ideas. One answer to high gas prices came from Minnesota and in the form of a 3 wheel car. A Burnville Minnesota car manufacturer answered the 1970′s high gas prices with the introduction of what was called the “micro car”. The inventor of the HMV was Dave Edmonson. Edmonson believed he could build a small car with superior gas mileage and he actually started his project back in 1970. The micro car was called the HMV Free-Way Car. This one seat, three wheel, extremely small vehicle was powered by either a 12 HP or 16 HP engine. It’s manufacturer, the H-M-Vehicles, Inc, boasted a 100 MPG rating for the 12 HP engine and about 60 MPG for the 16 HP model.
hmv cars

The HMV 3 wheel cars were built from 1979 to 1982.
CalGorgeVancouverOregCity-422-300x225.jpg


CalGorgeVancouverOregCity-423-300x225.jpg

courtesy http://automuseumonline.com/auto-freeway-cars-1981-hmv.html

see also http://clubs.hemmings.com/hmvfreeway/

sounds like fun.

old jim
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Thanks Jim I actually brought to life some old brain cells and found the formulas I needed. As my mentor quoted back years ago
when I was an apprentice machinist " You don't have to know everything just know where to find it". Anyway Your calulations
are the same as mine.I did some studying and a hydrostatic design is the most effiecent. Most designs I see incorporate accumalators. why? I contacted Eaton Corp. and they said there is no reason with proper design that a hydostatic design can"t be up to 88% efficent. I'm not going to use accumalators this is to bulky not to mention dangeous. As I have a lot of planning to do the progress will be slow. As it doesn't appear the EPA green fund gives grants to one person for R&D. They cater to the big wheels. Again Thanks for your help and in time I will let the community know how I'm doing on this
 
  • #8
I'll bet you have "Machinery Handbook".

If you ever get the chance , take in the "Florida Flywheelers" antique engine show in Zolfo Springs every February.
Scores of retired machinists from up North bring their projects to show.

http://www.floridaflywheelers.org/
 
  • #9
I have already taken a 550CC motor cycle engine and made a tractor it'a 12 ft. version of a real tractor. I did all the drive work myself
I actually had to engineer a drive system because the engine rotation is clockwise and the differential is counterclockwise..I'm born in Germany but moved to Tennessee when I was 6. My ancestors migrated in the 1700's to Arkansas then to Tennessee.
 
  • #10
Tesla approached the navy with his turbine engine, as the story goes his design was overlooked. It may run a micro car very well.
I remember a quote From Lee Iacocca " the whole idea of driving a 4000 lb car across town to save 39 cents on a can of beans is ridiculous".
I wish you well on your quest for perfection.
 
  • #11
psycho rich said:
Tesla approached the navy with his turbine engine, as the story goes his design was overlooked. It may run a micro car very well.
I remember a quote From Lee Iacocca " the whole idea of driving a 4000 lb car across town to save 39 cents on a can of beans is ridiculous".
I wish you well on your quest for perfection.
My thinking is more on the lines of decreasing the carbon footprint by making the power the engine produces more efficient to the wheels.. I don't see gasoline or diesel being replaced anytime soon. Not that it couldn't be done but that the Powers of governments are not going to allow it. Petro companies are too embedded in our political system. Profits always dominate. Enough about that! My idea of taking an existing car and converting it to hydraulics is achievable but my return on my time and investment to achieve this efficiency would not be seen for many years. The car would rust away first in the northeast US. So I have put my brainstorm at rest
and except that I am a " Small fish in a giant ocean " I just don't have the resources.
 
  • #12
There is a french car that is similar it runs on compressed air . Porsche built turbine/hybrid , I haven't followed up on either of them.
An inventor once told me to sell your idea to industry, much easier trying to build it your self. Unless your Henry Kaiser.
 
  • #13
rcgldr said:
You need the effective radius of the tires (there's some deformation slightly reducing the effective radius from the actual radius).
It seems counter-intuitive at first but the rolling circumference of a tyre is not significantly changed by air pressure, tread wear or load.

The length of the fabric just below and against the tyre tread does not change. That fabric is locked to the bead of the wheel rim When the load increases the area of the tyre footprint increases and appears to flatten the tyre. The vehicle is slightly lower relative to the road surface, but the length of tread is like a track-layer's track plates, (bulldozer), and does not change. The deformations of the rubber generate heat in the sidewall of the tyre. Higher tyre pressures are needed when carrying greater loads and at higher speeds so as to reduce heating of the tyre sidewall.
 
  • #14
psycho rich said:
Tesla approached the navy with his turbine engine, as the story goes his design was overlooked.
Tesla's turbine is very inefficient and so is always avoided by engineers who are trying to improve fuel economy. You could not sell a vehicle fitted with a Tesla Turbine because it would cost 3 times as much to run as an electric car.
 
  • #15
Baluncore said:
It seems counter-intuitive at first but the rolling circumference of a tyre is not significantly changed by air pressure, tread wear or load.

The length of the fabric just below and against the tyre tread does not change. That fabric is locked to the bead of the wheel rim When the load increases the area of the tyre footprint increases and appears to flatten the tyre. The vehicle is slightly lower relative to the road surface, but the length of tread is like a track-layer's track plates, (bulldozer), and does not change. The deformations of the rubber generate heat in the sidewall of the tyre. Higher tyre pressures are needed when carrying greater loads and at higher speeds so as to reduce heating of the tyre sidewall.

Not always true. Speed can have a notable effect on tire growth with some type of tires. The loaded radius of a top fuel dragster tire can grow up to 3.8" at 200 mph. The tire growth is so important that there is no need for a transmission to keep the engine in its rpm range:

 
  • #16
rcgldr said:
You need the effective radius of the tires (there's some deformation slightly reducing the effective radius from the actual radius).

Baluncore said:
It seems counter-intuitive at first but the rolling circumference of a tyre is not significantly changed by air pressure, tread wear or load.
I meant load and deformation in the direction of travel. Typically the tread compresses and slows down slightly in the direction of travel as it approaches the contact patch, then stretches and catches back up after it leaves the contact patch, so actual speed is slightlly less than unloaded radius of the driven tire. In the case of motorcycles, I seem to recall that it's 1% or so at high speed (higher load in the direction of travel). I don't know what the numbers are for other vehicle types.
 
  • #17
jack action said:
Not always true. Speed can have a notable effect on tire growth with some type of tires.
We are discussing economic road legal vehicle tyres here. It is an uncommon practice to drive across town at 200mph and change the tyres every week.
 
  • #18
psycho rich said:
There is a french car that is similar it runs on compressed air . Porsche built turbine/hybrid , I haven't followed up on either of them.
An inventor once told me to sell your idea to industry, much easier trying to build it your self. Unless your Henry Kaiser.
Thanks for getting back. The patent system as well as selling an idea has major flaw. In 1992 I invented and built a mechanical system in the textile industry.
Because there is nothing that keeps a design secret while a patent is pending all a company has do is make a small design change then it becomes their design.
It happened to me! Read up on it! Patent offices are corrupt and has been for many many years it's no secret. It's called Capitalization.
 
  • #19
H012 said:
Because there is nothing that keeps a design secret while a patent is pending all a company has do is make a small design change then it becomes their design.
You should file a Provisional Patent to protect your intellectual property in a general way. That PP is used later to set the priority date on the Full Specification of your patent. A correctly written PP will not be invalidated by a small design change.

You also need an intellectual property agreement with the user of the invention. The user can then pay you to maintain your patents because they get an exclusive license from you.

Patents can be very expensive. You must have a good relationship with the initial user of your invention and that user must benefit from the patent protection provided.
 
  • #20
Good luck with your invention, we certainly need to move in the direction of 1000 lb. cars. I've been looking into hemp oil fueled cars, reduced weight / cleaner fuel / better tires, if you put all that together we could make substantial progress.
 

1. How does hydraulic power work for a 1000 pound car?

Hydraulic power uses pressurized fluids to generate force, which is then used to move the car. In a hydraulic system, a pump pressurizes hydraulic fluid, which is then directed to a cylinder or motor to create movement. This movement is used to power the car's wheels, allowing it to move.

2. What are the benefits of using hydraulic power for a 1000 pound car?

Hydraulic power is known for its high power-to-weight ratio, meaning it can generate a lot of force without being too heavy. This makes it a great choice for smaller cars like a 1000 pound car. Additionally, hydraulic systems are reliable and require minimal maintenance, making them cost-effective in the long run.

3. Can hydraulic power be used for city driving?

Yes, hydraulic power can be used for city driving. In fact, it is commonly used in heavy-duty vehicles like garbage trucks and buses that operate in urban areas. Hydraulic power is well-suited for city driving because it provides instant torque and can easily handle frequent stops and starts.

4. How does hydraulic power compare to other power systems for a 1000 pound car?

Compared to other power systems, hydraulic power has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. It is more compact and lighter than electric or combustion engines, making it great for smaller cars. However, it may not be as efficient as other power systems and may have limitations in terms of speed and range.

5. Are there any environmental concerns with using hydraulic power for a 1000 pound car?

Hydraulic power itself is not harmful to the environment. However, the fluids used in hydraulic systems may pose a risk if not disposed of properly. Additionally, the overall environmental impact of hydraulic power for a car depends on the source of the power used to operate the pump, such as electricity or fossil fuels.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
19
Views
812
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Back
Top