What exactly makes Mesons unstable?

  • Thread starter 4nn4
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mesons
In summary, it is the combination of charge conservation and confinement that leads to the stability of the proton. Electroweak interactions cannot create a final state with less energy than the initial state, while strong interactions can only generate an additional meson in the final state. Baryon number conservation also plays a crucial role in explaining the proton's stability in the current theories, although it is expected to break down at high energies. In GUT theories, where baryon number conservation is not a fundamental principle, the proton is predicted to be unstable.
  • #1
4nn4
3
0
As the title says- what is it that makes all mesons unstable? I know some quarks are less stable than others obviously, but why is there no stable meson? What is it about any combination of quark and anti-quark that makes a particle decay nearly immediately?

In a related topic- what exactly is it about uud that makes a proton stable?

Thank you in advance to any respondents.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In general an initial state ##|i\rangle## will be unstable whenever there exists a final state ##|f\rangle##, such that:

1. ##|i\rangle## and ##|f\rangle## are connected by some interaction term ##\Gamma##. Namely, the matrix element ##\langle f |\Gamma| i \rangle ## is nonzero.

2. The potential energy of the final state is less than the energy of the initial state. Here we really mean that the mass of the particles in the final state are less than the initial state particle. Any excess energy will contribute to the kinetic energy of the final state particles.

For the mesons, the electroweak interactions always exist between quarks and antiquarks of the same or different type. For the same type of quark, we have electromagnetic interactions ##\bar{q} A_\mu \gamma^\mu q##, while for different quarks, there are weak interactions ##\bar{q} W_\mu \gamma^\mu q'##. These interactions can switch a quark ##q## to the same quark ##q## plus a photon or to a different type quark ##q'## plus a W boson. They can also destroy a quark-antiquark pair ##\bar{q}q## and create a photon, or destroy a ##\bar{q}q'## to create a W. The final state photon can create an electron-positron pair in the final state, while the W bosons will themselves decay to electrons and neutrinos in the final state, both of which are much, much lighter than the observed masses of mesons.


What is not explained by the above is why the mesons are heavier than electrons and neutrinos. It turns out that this is a consequence of the strength of the strong interactions, but there is no fundamental reason why. It is just an experimental fact.

The proton is stable because it is the lowest energy (lightest) configuration of 3 quarks. Because of charge conservation and color confinement, any electroweak interaction term like the ones above applied to the proton must lead to another final state composed of 3 quarks. Remember, the electroweak interactions either switch a quark for a quark + a gauge boson or replace a quark-antiquark pair for a gauge boson. So acting on a baryon ##q_1q_2q_3##, since we don't have an antiquark to destroy, we obtain another state

$$ q_1q_2q_3' + W,Z, \gamma. $$

There is no state ##q_1q_2q_3' ## with mass less than the proton, so a decay of this type is forbidden by energy conservation.

The strong interactions are a slightly different story. These have a form similar to the EM interaction, between same type quarks: ##\bar{q} G_\mu \gamma^\mu q##. The difference is the color indices on the quarks, which I haven't drawn in. The difference between this operator and the electroweak ones is that it operates on gluons. Since the proton is bound by the strong interactions, there are lots of virtual gluons present at any given time. So we can have strong interactions where we convert an internal gluon to a quark-antiquark pair. We can represent this as an interaction

$$ q_1q_2q_3g \rightarrow q_1q_2q_3 + \bar{q}_4 q_4.$$

So the strong interactions can generate an additional meson in the final state. However, since we still have the ##q_1q_2q_3## particle in the final state, energy conservation still prevents the photon from "decaying" in this manner.
 
  • Like
Likes 2 people
  • #3
Thank you for taking the time to write such a detailed and clearly explained response.

I admit I had to read it through several times, but it is making more sense each time I read it.

Thanks again
 
  • #4
fzero said:
The proton is stable because it is the lowest energy (lightest) configuration of 3 quarks. Because of charge conservation and color confinement, any electroweak interaction term like the ones above applied to the proton must lead to another final state composed of 3 quarks.

I find this statement interesting as I've always been told that it is baryon number conservation which leads to the proton being stable. Something I've never been entirely satisfied with as the baryon number conservation is in a sense not as fundamental as e.g. charge conservation.

Could you explain further why charge conservation and confinement leads to the proton being stable (and perhaps, if it is too much asked, comment on why this is different in GUT theories, where the proton is unstable? I would be grateful for any answer!
 
  • #5
kloptok said:
I find this statement interesting as I've always been told that it is baryon number conservation which leads to the proton being stable. Something I've never been entirely satisfied with as the baryon number conservation is in a sense not as fundamental as e.g. charge conservation.

Could you explain further why charge conservation and confinement leads to the proton being stable (and perhaps, if it is too much asked, comment on why this is different in GUT theories, where the proton is unstable? I would be grateful for any answer!

fzero did not mention it, but Baryon number conservation is essential to explain proton stability. Baryon number is not conserved in GUT theories, hence the prediction that protons do decay if GUT turns out to be correct.
 
  • #6
kloptok said:
I find this statement interesting as I've always been told that it is baryon number conservation which leads to the proton being stable. Something I've never been entirely satisfied with as the baryon number conservation is in a sense not as fundamental as e.g. charge conservation.
It is expected that baryon number conservation breaks down at high energies - there has to be some reason why we are surrounded by baryons without significant amounts of antibaryons. If there would be no such process, it would be as fundamental as charge conservation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #7
kloptok said:
I find this statement interesting as I've always been told that it is baryon number conservation which leads to the proton being stable. Something I've never been entirely satisfied with as the baryon number conservation is in a sense not as fundamental as e.g. charge conservation.

Could you explain further why charge conservation and confinement leads to the proton being stable (and perhaps, if it is too much asked, comment on why this is different in GUT theories, where the proton is unstable? I would be grateful for any answer!

Baryon number conservation is the explanation for why there are no interaction terms in the standard model that turn a quark into something else, such as ##\bar{e} V_\mu \gamma^\mu q## or the like. In the SM, baryon number is assigned to quarks directly and so is part of "charge conservation," though I didn't elaborate since my post was already very long and liable to be confusing. It's clear that confinement is necessary, else one could imagine a baryon splitting up into free quarks.

Before the quark model, baryon number conservation was much more directly connected with the fact that, in the decay chain of any heavy baryon, the end state always contains a proton. In the quark model, the end result is the same.
 
  • #8
Incidentally, if the mass of charged pion were equal to the mass of muon and the electron were massless, it would be stable at first order, because of "helicity suppression". Actually I am not sure if it is unstable beyond first order.
 
  • #9
How does a massless, charged particle look like?

If electron and muon both had at least the mass of a pion, the charged pion would be the lightest charged particle, and electrons and muons would decay to pions (+neutrino).
 
  • #10
dauto said:
fzero did not mention it, but Baryon number conservation is essential to explain proton stability. Baryon number is not conserved in GUT theories, hence the prediction that protons do decay if GUT turns out to be correct.

Tonight I've been unsuccessfully googling around for a document that walks you through those nucleon decay predictions without requiring too much background knowledge, do you know of any good ones?
 
  • #11
I'm not aware of any good ones. The basic concept is quite simple though. In grande unified theories there are multiplets that include leptons and quarks in them. That means that quarks can turn into leptons and vice-verse and would emit a virtual boson in the process. That's analog to the way that an electron can turn in a neutrino and vice-verse while emitting a W boson in the process. The W boson is very massive suppressing decays that depend on the weak force (That is why it is weak). The Gut bosons are expected to be about a million billion times more massive than the W boson suppressing decays that depend on them (such as the proton decay) by a much larger factor.
 

What are mesons?

Mesons are subatomic particles made up of a quark and an antiquark. They are a type of hadron, which are particles that interact through the strong nuclear force.

Why are mesons unstable?

Mesons are unstable because they have a short lifetime, meaning they decay into other particles quickly. This is due to the fact that they are made up of a quark and an antiquark, which have opposite charges. Since they are constantly interacting with each other, they eventually break apart and decay into other particles.

What exactly causes mesons to decay?

Mesons decay due to the strong nuclear force, which is mediated by particles called gluons. This force is what holds quarks together, but it also allows for the decay of mesons. When a meson decays, the quark and antiquark inside it exchange a gluon, causing them to break apart into other particles.

How long do mesons typically live?

The lifetime of a meson varies depending on its type. Some mesons, such as pions, have lifetimes on the order of 10^-8 seconds, while others, such as kaons, can live for up to 10^-10 seconds. This may seem short, but in the world of subatomic particles, it is actually quite long.

What is the significance of studying mesons?

Mesons play a crucial role in our understanding of the fundamental forces and particles that make up the universe. By studying their properties and decay patterns, scientists can gain insight into the strong nuclear force and the behavior of quarks. Additionally, mesons have important applications in nuclear physics, particle accelerators, and medical imaging technology.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
965
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top