- #1
user111_23
- 84
- 0
I'm think it's because it's impractical to find the area outside a closed figure. But I'm still not sure.
Integration is used to calculate the area under a curve because it allows us to find the exact value of the area, which would not be possible using other methods such as approximations or numerical methods. Integration also takes into account the entire curve, rather than just a few points, providing a more accurate result.
Integration is related to finding the area under a curve because it involves breaking down the curve into smaller, infinitesimal parts and adding them up to find the total area. This process is known as Riemann summation and is the basis of integration.
Yes, integration can be used for any type of curve, as long as it is continuous. This includes polynomial, trigonometric, exponential, and logarithmic curves, among others. However, the method of integration used may vary depending on the type of curve.
The area under a curve is important because it represents the total accumulation of a quantity over a given interval. This can have real-world applications in various fields, such as physics, economics, and engineering. Integration allows us to find this area accurately, making it an essential tool in scientific and mathematical calculations.
No, there is no difference between finding the area under a curve and finding the integral of a function. Integration is the mathematical process used to calculate both the area under a curve and the integral of a function. In fact, the integral of a function represents the area under the curve of that function.