Exploring the Redshift Phenomenon: Beyond the Expansion of the Universe

In summary, the redshift is a measure of the shift in frequencies of light waves as they travel between the source and the receiver. The expansion of the universe is the explanation for why distant galaxies are all receding from us.
  • #1
afcsimoes
59
2
When a photon loses a little bit of energy, its frequency lows a little. That is, it suffers a slight redshift.
So, why to interpret the redshift as being only due to the expansion of the Universe?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
afcsimoes said:
When a photon loses a little bit of energy, its frequency lows a little. That is, it suffers a slight redshift.
So, why to interpret the redshift as being only due to the expansion of the Universe?

The basic interpretation of the red shift is that the source-receiver separation is increasing. The expansion of the universe is the explanation of why distant galaxies are all receding from us.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
afcsimoes said:
When a photon loses a little bit of energy, its frequency lows a little. That is, it suffers a slight redshift.
So, why to interpret the redshift as being only due to the expansion of the Universe?

Strictly speaking, it is not entirely due to the expansion. There is s a trivial (by comparison) amount of actual proper motion between galaxies and it may be towards or away but it is so inconsequential compared to the recession speed that it is irrelevant.

What would you like to interpret it as?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
phinds said:
Strictly speaking, it is not entirely due to the expansion. There is s a trivial (by comparison) amount of actual proper motion between galaxies and it may be towards or away but it is so inconsequential compared to the recession speed that it is irrelevant.

What would you like to interpret it as?

I think that it could also be that the photons, when traveling between the source and the observer, have some loss of its energy (because of some interactions happening on that travel) and so, with less energy, they will appears as red shifted. Of course that this hypothetical phenomena must be uniform at all the emitted spectrum, as we see in fact.

This effect is real or not? if yes, can we estimate its value? it will introduce some additional imprecision to the computed distances?

Thanks to all
 
  • #6
afcsimoes said:
I think that it could also be that the photons, when traveling between the source and the observer, have some loss of its energy (because of some interactions happening on that travel) and so, with less energy, they will appears as red shifted. Of course that this hypothetical phenomena must be uniform at all the emitted spectrum, as we see in fact.

This effect is real or not? if yes, can we estimate its value? it will introduce some additional imprecision to the computed distances?

Thanks to all

The "tired light" theory was thoroughly debunked years ago.
 
  • #7
Thanks to all by the replies given to my nerd questions. All the best.
 
  • #8
I think the forums need one on the sociology of science. There are so many examples every minute where there's a meta context that is never discussed. The rampant anthropomorphizing in science writing/reporting is a big one. The very alive and well "alpha-primate" syndrome that still drives so much research money and documentaries in a discipline that touted 400 years ago, "We don't cow-tow to authority". And the way people interact with it. One you see everyday on various threads is the person that has come up with a brilliant idea- I've a theory that is contrary to everything anyone has every thought; I am brilliant- but they can't master English, which thousands manage every day. You see it with conspiracy theorists a lot. "I can't hold a job, move out of my parents' house, manage a relationship, get an education...but I've figured out all the things you don't understand about cold fusion". Or HAARP. I think it's worthy of a DSM category!
 
  • #9
DrJohnSmith said:
I think the forums need one on the sociology of science. There are so many examples every minute where there's a meta context that is never discussed

I understand your thoughts. I, too, discovered PF at a time that I wanted to express and 'bounce' my own ideas off of a more knowledgeable community. I was a "lurker" here for almost a year before registering, and the majority of my posts since then have been focused on to trying to help others.

I've grown to embrace the concept of PhysicsForums. The goal and success is based on being a place where all visitors can depend on seeking to better understand mainstream, peer-reviewed concepts in all areas of sciences. There are other places/forums on the internet that cater to extended interpretations and/or philosophical suggestions, and I for one am glad that they're separate from PF. It's important to me to know that that my questions and inquiries are 'kept in check' towards my better understanding of mainstream science.

Just my $.02.
 
  • #10
DrJohnSmith said:
I think the forums need one on the sociology of science.

As Tublingdice said, you misunderstand the purpose of the PF. We are not here to debunk nonsense but simply to help folks understand mainstream physics. People who are as you described, thinking they have come up with something brilliant when they understand very little, are not the point of this forum and PF wastes no time on them or on discussions of them.
 

1. What is red shift interpretation?

Red shift interpretation is a concept in astronomy that explains the observed increase in wavelength of light from distant objects in the universe. It is caused by the expansion of the universe, which stretches the light waves and shifts them towards the red end of the spectrum.

2. How is red shift measured?

Red shift is measured by examining the spectrum of light emitted by an object and comparing it to the known spectrum of elements on Earth. The amount of red shift is determined by the difference in wavelengths between the two spectra.

3. What does red shift tell us about the universe?

Red shift provides evidence for the expansion of the universe, as well as the overall rate of expansion. It also helps astronomers determine the distance and speed of objects in the universe, which can provide insight into the age and structure of the universe.

4. Can red shift be used to determine the age of the universe?

Yes, red shift can be used in combination with other astronomical observations to estimate the age of the universe. By measuring the red shift of distant objects and calculating the rate of expansion, scientists have estimated the age of the universe to be around 13.8 billion years.

5. Are there any limitations to red shift interpretation?

While red shift is a useful tool in understanding the universe, there are some limitations to its interpretation. For example, the red shift of an object can also be affected by its motion through space, which can complicate measurements. Additionally, red shift cannot be used to accurately measure distances over very small or very large scales.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
823
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top