## Riemann Sum Question

*SOLVED*

My question is quite simple. I probably just missed something somewhere. I've looked for hours and cannot find the mistake.

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Find the area under the curve using the definition of an integral and Gauss summation equations:

f(x) = 3 - (1/2)x
where x is greater than or equal to two and less than or equal to 14

2. Relevant equations

Formula #1: Gauss equation for the sum of a list simple list of numbers eg 1,2,3,etc.:

[n(n+1)]/2

Formula #2: to find area using Riemann sums:

lim as n→∞ of Ʃ from i=1 to n of:
f[(i*(b-a))/n]*[(b-a)/n]

3. The attempt at a solution

Using Formula #2:

lim as n→∞ of Ʃ from i=1 to n of:
f[12i/n]*(12/n)

pulling out 12/n from under the summation sign:

lim as n→∞ of 12/n * Ʃ from i=1 to n of:
3 - (6i/n)

pulling 36/n out from underneath the summation sign because it has no "counting" i variable:

lim as n→∞ of 36/n - (72/n^2) * Ʃ from 1 to n of i

Using Formula #1 to get rid of the summation sign:

lim as n→∞ of 36/n - (72n^2 + 72n)/2n^2

crossing out the factors n^2 and 2, which are in the N and D of the 2nd fraction:

lim as n→∞ of 36/n - 36 - 36/n

taking the limit:

-36

Now what's the problem?

142 3 - (1/2)x dx = -12

What went wrong? Again, I've been checking this thing for hours.
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens>> Google eyes emerging markets networks

Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
 Quote by joe_cool2 Using Formula #2: lim as n→∞ of Ʃ from i=1 to n of: f[12i/n]*(12/n)
This is evaluating the function in the interval [0,12], not [2,14].
 Yeah you have the formula for the Riemann sum just slightly (but crucially) wrong. It should be: ##\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(a+\frac{i(b-a)}{n})\cdot(\frac{b-a}{n})##

## Riemann Sum Question

Alright. Well here's the updated version using the correct formula.

lim as n→∞ of Ʃ from i=1 to n of:
f[(12i/n)+2]*(12/n)

pulling out 12/n from under the summation sign:

lim as n→∞ of 12/n * Ʃ from i=1 to n of:
3 - (6i/n) - 1

pulling 36/n out from underneath the summation sign because it has no "counting" i variable:

lim as n→∞ of 36/n - [(72/n^2) * Ʃ from 1 to n of i] - 12/n

Using Formula #1 to get rid of the summation sign:

lim as n→∞ of 36/n - (72n^2 + 72n)/2n^2 - 12/n

crossing out the factors n^2 and 2, which are in the N and D of the 2nd fraction:

lim as n→∞ of 36/n - 36 - 36/n - 12/n

taking the limit:

-36

Still the same, wrong answer. Am I just being stupid or what?
 There's two mistakes I see: when you plugged in f(2+12/n), you flipped a sign. you can't really "pull out 36/n" the way you have; sorry I didn't catch this first time around. When you're at the stage where you have ##\frac{12}{n}\sum{(3-6i/n)}##, you have to be a bit more careful about how you simplify this sum. Try breaking it up into two sums for instance.
 Recognitions: Homework Help Science Advisor I think gustav1139 already found the problem, but you aren't presenting the solution very clearly either. Go back and change 3 - (6i/n) + 1 to 3 - (6i/n) - 1. That's where you flipped the sign.
 Okay I changed them to minus signs. I see where I messed up there. But as far as I remember, you can pull factors out of the sums as long as no terms have an "i" in them. Why can I not do it in this case? I basically did split it up like: (12/n) Ʃ 3 - (12/n) Ʃ (6i/n) - (12/n) Ʃ 1 When I said "pull out 36/n" I meant that the sum from 1 to n of 3 is just 3, so: 36/n - (12/n) Ʃ (6i/n) - (12/n) Ʃ 1
 What's ##\sum_{i=1}^{n}3##?
 Oh, dear. It's 3n, isn't it? Sorry, it's been about six months since the beginning of my Calc II class last semester. Thanks for your patience. EDIT: Solved.