- #1
- 7,776
- 474
Some organization called CNW Marketing Research Inc. has published an "analysis" of the total energy consumption of various kinds of cars. It is called Dust to Dust: The Energy Cost of New Vehicles From Concept to Disposal.
This is most certainly not a scientific paper (it refers to "gigajuelles" for example). No author is given credit. It appears to be nothing more than a marketing ploy.
The conclusions and analysis appear to be quite absurd. For example it says that the total (societal) cost of energy consumption during the lifetime of a Toyota Corolla is $0.73 per mile and the cost of a Toyota Prius is $3.25 per mile. No explanation is given as to how this data was obtained. To suggest that a Prius will cost $3.25/mile for 109,000 miles means that the total societal cost for a Prius is $354,000. Now a Prius might cost about $30,000 and at 40 mpg (mine gets about 44) it will consume about 2725 gallons. At $3 per gallon (the figure used in the report) that works out to and additional $8175. So even if the car lasts only 109,000 (mine is already at nearly 97000 and is still like a new car) it would cost the owner less than $40,000 or about $.37 per mile. That includes everything: materials, labour, energy etc. So how can just the energy cost $354,000? How is it possible that society subsidizes a vehicle by that much?
Am I missing something?
AM
This is most certainly not a scientific paper (it refers to "gigajuelles" for example). No author is given credit. It appears to be nothing more than a marketing ploy.
The conclusions and analysis appear to be quite absurd. For example it says that the total (societal) cost of energy consumption during the lifetime of a Toyota Corolla is $0.73 per mile and the cost of a Toyota Prius is $3.25 per mile. No explanation is given as to how this data was obtained. To suggest that a Prius will cost $3.25/mile for 109,000 miles means that the total societal cost for a Prius is $354,000. Now a Prius might cost about $30,000 and at 40 mpg (mine gets about 44) it will consume about 2725 gallons. At $3 per gallon (the figure used in the report) that works out to and additional $8175. So even if the car lasts only 109,000 (mine is already at nearly 97000 and is still like a new car) it would cost the owner less than $40,000 or about $.37 per mile. That includes everything: materials, labour, energy etc. So how can just the energy cost $354,000? How is it possible that society subsidizes a vehicle by that much?
Am I missing something?
AM