Cool classical physics proof I came up with today

In summary, This pdf discusses the distance a object travels and the area under a curve that represents that distance. There is an error on page 5 where the equation is not valid for when the acceleration is not constant.
  • #1
realfuzzhead
14
0
Check out this pdf on this website. No signing up or anything, It took me the better half of today to do this. Anyways, this might be well known for people above my basic physics knowledge, but I came up with this all by myself knowing a few simple equations


http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/3569845/fun-with-physics-pdf-february-18-2012-7-59-am-579k?da=y
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Equation 1. on page 6 is wrong.

[tex] V_{avg} = \frac {V_0 + V} {2} [/tex]

is only valid if the acceleration is constant.

The right result is easy to find with calculus by integrating v = (v_0 + at + (1/2)Jt^2).
The distance is equal to the area under this curve.
(of course Archimedes found the area under a parabola in the 3rd century BC without calculus)
 
  • #3
That's pretty good! Unfortunately an error creeps in on page 5: I will use your numbering...

p5,1) This expression for Vave is only true when V is increasing linearly i.e. when its acceleration is constant.

p5,3) Again because acceleration is not constant this is not the right equation. Instead we need [itex]D = D_0 + \int V(t)dt[/itex]. From what you have written I am not sure if you have come across integration yet: if not, it is enough to know for now that it is the inverse of differentiation.

Now we already have [itex]V(t) = V_0 + A_0t + \frac 1 2 Jt^2[/itex], integrating this we have [itex]D(t) = D_0 + V_0t + \frac 1 2 A_0t^2 + \frac 1 6 Jt^3[/itex].

Note that we can check this by differentiation:
[tex]\begin{align}D(t) &= D_0 + V_0t + \frac 1 2 A_0t^2 + \frac 1 6 Jt^3 \\
V(t) &= \frac d{dt} D(t) = V_0 + A_0t + \frac 1 2 Jt^2 \\
A(t) &= \frac d{dt} V(t) = A_0 + Jt \\
\frac d{dt} A(t) &= J\end{align}[/tex]
 
  • #4
THANK YOU GUYS! Damnit.. I thought that last part was a little bit to easy. I just started calculus this week so I have not learned integration yet..
 
  • #5


That's great to hear! It's always exciting when we are able to come up with our own proofs and discoveries in physics. I will definitely take a look at the pdf and see what you have come up with. Even if it may be well known to others, it's still a valuable learning experience for you to have come up with it on your own. Keep exploring and pushing the boundaries of classical physics!
 

What is your "cool classical physics proof" about?

My proof involves using Newton's laws of motion to explain a phenomenon in classical mechanics.

What evidence do you have to support your proof?

I have conducted experiments and analyzed data to support my proof. I have also reviewed existing literature and theories in classical physics.

How does your proof contribute to our understanding of classical physics?

My proof offers a new perspective on a particular phenomenon in classical mechanics and provides further evidence for the accuracy and applicability of Newton's laws of motion.

Can your proof be applied to other areas of physics?

While my proof is specific to classical mechanics, the principles and concepts used can potentially be applied to other areas of physics as well.

What are the implications of your proof for future research in classical physics?

My proof opens up new avenues for research and exploration in the field of classical physics, particularly in relation to Newton's laws of motion and their applications.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
571
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top