Beta Negative Decay: Is Mass Defect Calculated Correctly?

In summary: The other atoms might be able to hold on to their own electrons, but the He-3 ion can easily pick up an electron from a neighboring atom. This happens because the He-3 ion is slightly more massive than the other ions, and so attracts the electron more strongly. Additionally, beta decay is a very exothermic reaction, which means that energy is released in the form of heat. This heat is enough to free up the electron from the atom, and so beta decay can happen rapidly.
  • #1
coreluccio
35
2
During beta negative decay, in an unstable isotope, a neutron is converted into a proton, electron, and antineutrino. The electron and antineutrino are ejected from the atom and the proton remains in the nucleus to become the new daughter element.

For a beta negative decay reaction for some element, I decide to calculate the mass defect of the reaction by subtracting the masses of the reactants from the masses of the products. I use a chart of common atomic isotopes, each isotope's mass given in its neutral state.

Now, the daughter element has one more proton than the parent element did, but they both have the same number of electrons. The daughter element, then, has a positive charge of +1, right? So the mass of the daughter element, given on the chart, will give its neutral mass, assuming it has one more electron than it really does, and thus falsifying my calculations.


Is this the case or am I wrong on something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If we were to use nuclear masses in the calculation, we would have to include the mass of the outgoing electron:

[tex]Q = M_{nuc}(A,Z) - M_{nuc}(A,Z+1) - m_e[/tex]

However, the masses that we actually find in the standard tables are atomic masses of neutral atoms, which include the mass of Z electrons: [itex]M(A,Z) = M_{nuc}(A,Z) + Zm_e[/itex]. Substituting for the nuclear masses in the first equation:

[tex]Q = [M(A,Z) - Zm_e] - [M(A,Z+1) - (Z+1)m_e] - m_e[/tex]

Remove the brackets and parentheses, collect terms, and [itex]m_e[/itex] drops out.

See the following thread for a discussion of positive beta decay, in which case the result is different:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=375065
 
  • #3
jtbell, I am also interested to know where can we find the extra electron.. can you redescribe using layman's terms?

Specifically, 4He beta(-) decays to 3He (neutron changes to Proton and emitting a beta particle). So the nucleus now has 3 protons and one neutron, whereas the orbitting electrons there are only two.. where will the extra electron come from to make the atom neutral?

(p/s - I'm not sure of 4He can beta decay at all - just an example, pls feel free to correct me)

Basically, I understand from your reply how to calculate the mass (and Q energy) conservation, but I can't figure out charge conservation.

To me it looks like the daughter product has an extra +ve charge.. so will it get an extra electron from somewhere?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
masch said:
jtbell, I am also interested to know where can we find the extra electron.. can you redescribe using layman's terms?

Specifically, 4He beta(-) decays to 3He (neutron changes to Proton and emitting a beta particle). So the nucleus now has 3 protons and one neutron, whereas the orbitting electrons there are only two.. where will the extra electron come from to make the atom neutral?

(p/s - I'm not sure of 4He can beta decay at all - just an example, pls feel free to correct me)

Basically, I understand from your reply how to calculate the mass (and Q energy) conservation, but I can't figure out charge conservation.

To me it looks like the daughter product has an extra +ve charge.. so will it get an extra electron from somewhere?

Um, no, He-4 certainly cannot beta decay. Even if it could beta decay, it would decay to Li-4, not He-3.

H-3, for a more realistic example, will beta decay, becoming He-3.
 
  • #5
OK that makes sense..

Lets say Tritium, 1 proton + 2 neutrons then beta-decays to 3He (2 protons + 1 neutron)

Beta- decay = 1 neutron changes into a proton and releases a beta particle.

Now the atom, originally having 1 electron in orbit (Hydrogen) and 1 proton in nucleus.. having a neutral charge. But now, it has 2 protons in nucleus and only 1 electron (still) in orbit.. as the beta- particle is ejected out of the atom.. So is He-3 a +1 charged atom then?
 
  • #6
Temporarily, you have a singly-charged He-3 ion. It soon picks up an electron from a neighboring atom, which in turn becomes an ion and picks up an electron from a neighboring atom, etc., until finally some ion in the chain picks up the electron that was ejected in the original beta decay.
 
  • #7
jtbell said:
Temporarily, you have a singly-charged He-3 ion. It soon picks up an electron from a neighboring atom, which in turn becomes an ion and picks up an electron from a neighboring atom, etc., until finally some ion in the chain picks up the electron that was ejected in the original beta decay.

Hi JtBell, thanks for your answer..

But isn't that a bit far fetched? Why can't the other atoms around the He-3 ion hold on to their own electrons? Also, if this is true, then there will be lots and lots of electrons jumping around from atom to atom - and this means there are a lot of electricity being passed around us - wireless electricity..
 
  • #8
Hi there,

masch said:
But isn't that a bit far fetched? Why can't the other atoms around the He-3 ion hold on to their own electrons?

Because of the energy carried by the decay electron. It can carry up to ~15keV of kinetic energy. This means that it needs to slow down, before it can be captured by an atom.

masch said:
Also, if this is true, then there will be lots and lots of electrons jumping around from atom to atom - and this means there are a lot of electricity being passed around us - wireless electricity..

Lots and lots of electrons are jumping around in matter, no matter what. It does not mean anything more than moving electron. To have "electricity" in the sense that we understand it, the electrons must be moving "all" in the same direction. In this case, the movement is completely random, since a electrons can move left, right, up, or down, giving no measurable current.

Cheers
 
  • #9
masch said:
Hi JtBell, thanks for your answer..

But isn't that a bit far fetched? Why can't the other atoms around the He-3 ion hold on to their own electrons? Also, if this is true, then there will be lots and lots of electrons jumping around from atom to atom - and this means there are a lot of electricity being passed around us - wireless electricity..

Yes, that's the principle of a SNAP (system for nuclear auxiliary power) as used for generating energy e.g. in satellites.
 

1. What is beta negative decay?

Beta negative decay is a type of nuclear decay in which a neutron inside an atom's nucleus is converted into a proton, along with the emission of an electron and an antineutrino.

2. How is mass defect calculated in beta negative decay?

In beta negative decay, mass defect is calculated by subtracting the total mass of the products (proton, electron, and antineutrino) from the total mass of the original atom. The difference in mass is converted into energy according to Einstein's famous equation E=mc^2.

3. Is mass defect calculated correctly in beta negative decay?

Yes, the calculation of mass defect is accurate in beta negative decay. It has been experimentally verified and is a fundamental concept in nuclear physics.

4. How does beta negative decay affect an atom's atomic number and mass number?

In beta negative decay, the conversion of a neutron to a proton increases the atom's atomic number by 1. However, since an electron is emitted, the mass number remains the same.

5. Can beta negative decay occur in all elements?

Yes, beta negative decay can occur in all elements, but it is more common in elements with a high number of neutrons in their nucleus, as this conversion helps to stabilize the nucleus.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top