Register to reply 
What does curl E = const. on Ω say about E on ∂Ω? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Apr513, 05:27 AM

P: 154

Assume I have a simply connected domain Ω and a twice differentiable vector field E for which I know that "∇×E = const." (1) and "∇E = 0" (2) on Ω  I am interested in solving a BC Problem on ∏ = (Ʃ ⊃ Ω)\Ω, the remainder of Ʃ less Ω.
(1) and (2) imply certain restrictions on the BC on ∏. Question: Which are the restrictions equivalent to (1) and (2)? By Stokes' theorem, ∫dr·E = ∫dA·const. along the boundary of ∂Ω, but that alone can't possibly be equivalent, can it? I might pick an E which satisfies a certain curve integral value along ∂Ω and which can't satisfy (1) and (2), I assume. Context: A conductor is forming a loop the hole in which is pierced by a changing magnetic field  how this can be reformulated into BCs on the conductor's domain? Can it, at all? 


#2
Apr713, 04:32 AM

PF Gold
P: 1,134

Starting with the assumptions 1,2 and Maxwell's equations, I do not see how one could arrive at simple boundary conditions. Probably many different boundary conditions are possible.
On the other hand, for metallic ring in slowly changing magnetic field, the boundary conditions on its surface are known. The electric field E has continuous tangential component, and the normal component has jump proportional to surface charge density. The magnetic field B has continuous normal component, and the tangential component has jump proportional to surface current density. Inside the metallic ring, the current density may be assumed to be proportional to electric field (Ohm's law). 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
In binary can we have a value with deci centi mili or more lower valued prefix?  Computers  14  
Meaning of a Flat, Open, and Closed Universe  Cosmology  21  
Definition of Curl. Can anyone derive the gradient operator?  General Math  5  
How to make another interpretation of curl ?  Calculus  4 