Interesting Thoughts on Objects & Speed of Light

In summary, the conversation discusses the idea of a thought experiment involving a box and the speed of light. It is explained that the box will never reach the speed of light, but its acceleration will gradually slow as it gets closer. The formula ##F=ma## is not applicable in this scenario and the relativistic definition of momentum is needed. It is also mentioned that the concept of mass approaching infinity as one approaches the speed of light is not accurate and instead, the mass would approach zero. The conversation also delves into the limitations of teaching simplified versions of physics in high school due to the lack of calculus knowledge.
  • #1
kingofxbox99
2
0
I was thinking, and somehow I had this little "thought experiment" type thing relating to objects and the speed of light. (This is just my thoughts, I don't know if it's correct or the validity of my assumptions, etc)

Imagine you're in a (large) room, and that the effects of friction, air resistance, etc. are nonexistant. You walk up to a box at the end of the room, and apply a constant force to it. If the force remains constant, the acceleration will remain constant. Eventually, the box's velocity will get close to the speed of light. Once it hits the speed of light, it's acceleration will instantly drop to 0, and in order to maintain a constant force, it's mass will approach infinity (F = ma). Is this why people always say that your mass would approach infinity as you approach the speed of light? Just a cool little thought I had. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
kingofxbox99 said:
Imagine you're in a (large) room, and that the effects of friction, air resistance, etc. are nonexistant. You walk up to a box at the end of the room, and apply a constant force to it. If the force remains constant, the acceleration will remain constant. Eventually, the box's velocity will get close to the speed of light. Once it hits the speed of light, it's acceleration will instantly drop to 0, and in order to maintain a constant force, it's mass will approach infinity (F = ma).
The box will never reach the speed of light. Instead, its acceleration will gradually slow and it will get closer to the speed of light without ever quite getting there.

You cannot use ##F=ma## here; that's a simplified formula that only works for speeds that are small compared with the speed of light. For your problem, you have to make two changes:

First, you have to use the more general ##F=\frac{dp}{dt}## where ##p## is the momentum, instead of ##F=ma##.

Second you have to use the relativistic definition of momentum: ##p=\gamma{m}{v}## where ##\gamma## is ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}## (I'm measuring distances in light-years and times in years so that the speed of light is one in this formula).

Note that if ##v## is small these formulas reduce to the familiar ##F=ma##. But in your problem, ##v## is not small.

Is this why people always say that your mass would approach infinity as you approach the speed of light?
No. The people who say that are repeating something that they heard from someone else who also doesn't understand relativity. (Or they understand relativity and are really terrible teachers).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Thanks for explaining that! I hate how simplified everything is at the high school level...
 
  • #4
kingofxbox99 said:
Thanks for explaining that! I hate how simplified everything is at the high school level...

It's necessary, as it is far easier to learn something like F=MA instead of the relativistic version at that level. You have to walk before you can run, after all. Besides, for everyday physics the classical version you learn in high school works just fine.
 
  • #5
kingofxbox99 said:
Thanks for explaining that! I hate how simplified everything is at the high school level...

Well, you do have to have classical physics down cold before you're ready to take on relativity, so we teach it first.

Another complication is that many high-school students have not yet had a full year of calculus, so we can't use calculus, just trignometry and algebra. That makes it hard, especially when you consider that when Newton was figuring out classical mechanics, he needed calculus so badly that he had to invent it. ##F=\frac{dp}{dt}## is the most powerful and general expression of Newton's second law; but if you don't have calculus you have to settle for ##F=ma##, which falls out of ##F=\frac{dp}{dt}## if you remember that classically ##p=mv## and assume a constant mass.
 
  • #6
kingofxbox99 said:
You walk up to a box at the end of the room, and apply a constant force to it. If the force remains constant, the acceleration will remain constant. Eventually, the box's velocity will get close to the speed of light. Once it hits the speed of light, it's acceleration will instantly drop to 0, and in order to maintain a constant force, it's mass will approach infinity (F = ma).

That's a very interesting question. When starting from rest the box will be accelerated according to

[tex]a = \frac{F}{m}\sqrt {1 - \frac{{v^2 }}{{c^2 }}} ^3[/tex]

F and a can only remain constant if m is decreased with velocity (e.g. by emission of radiation) according to

[tex]m = m_0 \cdot \sqrt {1 - \frac{{v^2 }}{{c^2 }}} ^3[/tex]

That means when the box reaches the speed of light its mass doesn't approaches infinity but zero. Moreover, energy goes zero too:

[tex]E = m_0 \cdot \left( {c^2 - v^2 } \right)[/tex]

Thus there would be nothing left to accelerate or to apply a force to.
 

1. What is the speed of light and why is it important?

The speed of light is the fastest speed at which energy can travel through space. It is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. This speed is important because it is a fundamental constant of the universe and it plays a crucial role in many scientific theories and equations, such as Einstein's theory of relativity.

2. Can anything travel faster than the speed of light?

According to our current understanding of physics, no. The speed of light is considered to be the ultimate speed limit of the universe. Objects with mass cannot reach or exceed the speed of light, and even objects without mass, such as photons, can only travel at the speed of light.

3. How does the speed of light affect our perception of time and space?

As an object approaches the speed of light, time appears to slow down for that object. This phenomenon, known as time dilation, has been confirmed through experiments and is a crucial aspect of Einstein's theory of relativity. Additionally, the speed of light also affects our perception of space, as objects traveling at high speeds appear to shrink in length according to an outside observer.

4. Are there any exceptions to the speed of light being constant?

In special circumstances, such as in extreme gravitational fields, the speed of light can appear to vary. This is due to the curvature of spacetime caused by massive objects like stars and black holes. However, the speed of light itself is still considered to be a constant in these situations, it is just the observation of it that changes.

5. How is the speed of light measured?

The speed of light can be measured using various methods, such as using a laser to measure the time it takes for light to travel a known distance. The most accurate and widely accepted measurement was achieved by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in 1983, using a technique known as the "interferometric method". This measurement has been accepted as the official value for the speed of light.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
886
  • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
826
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
929
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top