Is this true? euclidean metric <= taxicab metric

In summary, the given sequences \left\{x_n\right\}, \left\{y_n\right\} satisfy the inequality \sqrt{ \Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} (x_n - y_n)^2} \leq \Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} |x_n - y_n|. This can be proven by squaring both sides and using the properties of absolute convergence of infinite series. The cases where one or both sides of the inequality involve divergent series are not valid and the Euclidean metric is the shortest distance between two points.
  • #1
Mosis
55
0
given sequences [tex]\left\{x_n\right\}, \left\{y_n\right\}[/tex], is it true that

[tex]\sqrt{ \Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} (x_n - y_n)^2} \leq \Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} |x_n - y_n|[/tex]

this isn't a homework problem. it's just something that came up - I think it's pretty clear that it's true, but I don't know how to show this.

edit: the sequences are square summable, of course.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Square both sides. The left hand side is obvious. Squaring the right hand side will yield the square of the left hand side plus another series, each of whose terms is non-negative.
 
  • #3
right, I'm retarded. i was thinking that squaring something didn't preserve the inequality, but that's because i was confused about something else. thanks! (sorry, it's late, and if i have to prove that one more set is closed or one more set is dense, then I'm going to be very grumpy tomorrow.)
 
  • #4
... although it's not clear to me how squaring an infinite sum must make sense
 
  • #5
Mosis said:
... although it's not clear to me how squaring an infinite sum must make sense
If two series [itex]A=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n[/tex] and [itex]B=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty} b_m[/tex] are absolutely convergent, the product of the two series is absolutely convergent and converges to [itex]AB[/itex]. See http://www.mathreference.com/lc-prod,p2s.html

In this case, each element of the series on the right-hand side is non-negative, so if the series converges it is absolutely convergent, and thus its square is

[tex]\left(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} |x_n-y_n|\right)^2 =
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} |x_n-y_n| |x_m-y_m|[/tex]There are four cases to consider in determining the validity of [itex]||x-y||_{L2} \le ||x-y||_{L1}[/itex]
  1. Both sides of the inequality involve convergent series.
    The way to show that the inequality holds in this case is to square both sides of the inequality as mentioned above.
  2. The left-hand side diverges, the right hand side converges.
    If this case ever did occur it would falsify the conjecture. It is easy to show that this case cannot occur.
  3. The left-hand side converges, the right hand side diverges.
    Example: y_n=0, x_n=1/n. The inequality is trivially true in this case.
  4. Both sides of the inequality involve divergent series.
    Informally, this is essentially the equivalent of ∞ ≤ ∞. Formally, this is nonsense. One or both series needs to converge here.
 
  • #6
Essentially, you are just saying that a straight line is the shortest distance between two points. The Euclidean metric measures distance along a straight line. The taxi cab metric doesn't.
 
  • #7
First, if the absolute value infinite series diverges to [tex] \infty[/tex], there is nothing to prove - the left side MUST be [tex] \le [/tex] the right. If the right side series is finite, then:

If you are concerned about squaring infinite sums you can approach things this way. For any finite [tex] n [/tex] ([tex] \Leftrightarrow [/tex] refers to ``if and only if'')
I know your problem is written with [tex] x_i - y_i [/tex] - think of my work as referring to this difference by [tex] z_i [/tex]

[tex]
\begin{align*}
\left(\sum_{i=1}^n z_i^2\right)^{1/2} & \le \sum_{i=1}^n |z_i| \\
& \Leftrightarrow \\
\sum_{i=1}^n z_i^2 & \le \left(\sum_{i=1}^n |z_i|\right)^2 \\
& = \sum_{i=1}^n z_i^2 + 2\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \sum_{j=i+1}^n |z_i z_j| \\
&\le \sum_{i=1}^\infty z_i^2 + 2\sum_{i<j}^\infty |z_i z_j| \\
&=\left(\sum_{i=1}^\infty |z_i|\right)^2 < \infty
\end{align*}
[/tex]

Since this holds for every value of [tex] n [/tex], you can let [tex] n \to \infty [/tex]
on the left to find

[tex]
\sum_{i=1}^\infty z_i^2 \le \left(\sum_{i=1}^\infty |z_i|\right)^2
[/tex]

the infinite series converge because you are assuming the sums represent metrics on suitably defined sequence spaces.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the difference between euclidean metric and taxicab metric?

The euclidean metric is a measure of distance between two points in a straight line, while the taxicab metric is a measure of distance that takes into account the distance traveled along a grid-like path.

2. Which metric is more commonly used in real-life applications?

The euclidean metric is more commonly used in real-life applications because it is more intuitive and closely aligns with our perception of distance.

3. How are these two metrics related?

The taxicab metric is a variation of the euclidean metric, where instead of measuring the shortest distance between two points, it measures the distance traveled along a grid-like path. This means that the taxicab metric will always be equal to or greater than the euclidean metric.

4. Can the taxicab metric be used in all situations?

No, the taxicab metric is only applicable in situations where distance is measured along a grid-like path, such as in cities with a grid-like street layout.

5. What are the advantages of using the taxicab metric over the euclidean metric?

The taxicab metric can be useful in situations where the shortest distance between two points is not feasible or practical, such as in cities with heavy traffic or one-way streets. It also takes into account the actual distance traveled, which can be more relevant in certain scenarios.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
872
Replies
11
Views
969
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
231
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top