Direct vs Indirect drive for fusion

In summary, a hohlraum is an important component in laser fusion that helps to amplify and concentrate energy from lasers and maintain a stable environment for the fusion reaction. It may be destroyed after each pulse, but advancements in technology have led to more durable designs. Despite this, both laser fusion and magnetic confinement approaches are still far from achieving controlled fusion.
  • #1
Kidphysics
164
0
What is so good about having a hohlraum, and is it destroyed after every pulse?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
It serves to provide a relatively uniform source of radiation at shorter wave lengths as it absorbs the laser pulse and heats up.
It is of course destroyed in the process.
The painful reality is that laser fusion has shown itself to be an equally thorny path to controlled fusion as magnetic confinement is. Either approach is still at least an order of magnitude or two short of what is needed, despite huge investments.
 
  • #3


Having a hohlraum is beneficial because it serves as a container for the fusion fuel and helps to amplify and concentrate the energy from the lasers used in the fusion process. It also helps to prevent heat loss and maintain a stable environment for the fusion reaction to occur.

As for whether it is destroyed after every pulse, it depends on the specific design and materials used. Some hohlraums may be able to withstand multiple pulses, while others may need to be replaced after each use. However, advancements in technology and materials have allowed for more durable and long-lasting hohlraums to be developed.
 

1. What is the difference between direct and indirect drive fusion?

Direct drive fusion involves directly bombarding the fusion fuel with high-energy lasers or particle beams, while indirect drive fusion uses these beams to heat and compress a capsule of fusion fuel, which then triggers fusion reactions.

2. Which method is more efficient for achieving fusion?

Both direct and indirect drive fusion have advantages and disadvantages, and their efficiency depends on various factors such as the fuel type and the size of the fusion reactor. However, indirect drive fusion is currently the more widely used method for achieving fusion in laboratory experiments.

3. What are the main challenges with direct drive fusion?

Direct drive fusion faces challenges such as the difficulty in accurately focusing the high-energy beams onto the small fusion fuel target, and the potential for instabilities in the fusion fuel due to the intense radiation from the beams.

4. How does indirect drive fusion address these challenges?

Indirect drive fusion addresses the challenges of direct drive by using a larger surface area to distribute the high-energy beams more evenly, and by using a capsule to contain and protect the fusion fuel from instabilities.

5. Which method is more likely to be used in future fusion power plants?

At this point, it is uncertain which method will be used in future fusion power plants. Both direct and indirect drive fusion are still being researched and developed, and the most feasible method will likely be determined by factors such as cost, efficiency, and safety.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top