Problem from Griffiths confused me

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of motional emf and introduces a new twist where the rod has no resistance. The participants go through the calculation of current and force for this scenario and conclude that the rod will execute simple harmonic motion. The confusion arises when considering the self-inductance, but it is eventually resolved through the application of Ohm's law and the line integral of force. The conversation ends with the participants feeling satisfied with their understanding and appreciation for the forum.
  • #1
WiFO215
420
1
I'll explain the problem.

[tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\cdots[/tex]
[tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\ldots[/tex]=====|======
[tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\cdots[/tex] || LOOP | LOOP || --> V
[tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\cdots[/tex] ||=====|=====||
[tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\cdots[/tex] <-x-> ..|
[tex]\cdots[/tex] [tex]\cdots[/tex]

[Dotted area indicates field]

In the usual discussion of motional emf, all authors go through the usual loop moving through a magnetic field which is perpendicular to the plane in which the loop is moving. Usually, this loop have resistance, say R and starts out with a bit of the loop already outside the field. The emf can be shown to be Bhv wherein B is the strength of the magnetic field, h is the length of the rod and v is the velocity with which the loop is being pulled along. Therefore the current can be calculated as BLV/R.

Now he introduces a new twist in the question. Assume the rod has no resistance, i.e. that it is a perfect conductor. I have to show that the rod will now execute simple harmonic motion.

This being said, I got the answer.
Qualitatively, we can say that the current will not shoot to infinity as the self-inductance will not allow that to happen. The back EMF associated with the loop will save the day.

In this case the flux can be taken to be Bhx where x is the length of the loop still inside the field. Refer to my "diagram". The flux for this loop is also given by LI where I is the current flowing through the loop and L is its self-inductance.

Equating the two, we have current I = Bhx/L
The force on this loop is given by (IhB).
So,
mx'' = -Kx, where K is B2h2/mL.

It is quite obvious that the rod will execute simple harmonic motion. Hence proved.

Now what confuses me is that the above equation holds for any loop with or without resistance. He says something here in the problem that in general cases the self-inductance thing is negligible. I don't get that. Shouldn't all loops execute SHM?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hold on. I think I'm confusing two different things. One is the EMF generated by the change in flux of the magnetic field through the loop and the other is due to the induced current. I think I'm along the lines of the answer now, but still can't put my finger on it. Can someone finish it off?
 
  • #3
I think I'm done. Listen to this. By Ohm's law,

[tex]\epsilon[/tex] - L (dI/dt) = IR = 0, where [tex]\epsilon[/tex] is the EMF.

On the other hand, [tex]\epsilon[/tex] = d[tex]\phi[/tex]/dt is the line integral of the force per unit charge = Bhv.

Therefore,
[tex]\epsilon[/tex] = Bhv = L (dI/dt).

Now that we've found dI/dt in terms of v, the force acting on the loop mdv/dt = - I(hxB)

Differentiating on both sides, we have our answer.
That now results in the above equation that I'd originally written down in my first post and thus leads to simple harmonic motion. There! I'm done. Something about this forum that makes me able to answer my own questions. Love this place.
 
Last edited:

What is the "Problem from Griffiths"?

The "Problem from Griffiths" refers to a specific physics problem presented in David J. Griffiths' textbook, Introduction to Electrodynamics. It is a commonly used textbook for undergraduate level courses in electromagnetism.

Why is the "Problem from Griffiths" confusing?

The "Problem from Griffiths" can be confusing for some because it often requires a deep understanding of mathematical concepts and principles in order to solve it. It may also involve multi-step calculations and critical thinking skills.

What are some tips for understanding the "Problem from Griffiths"?

Some tips for understanding the "Problem from Griffiths" include reviewing the relevant mathematical concepts, breaking the problem into smaller parts, and seeking guidance from a professor or tutor if needed. It may also be helpful to work through similar practice problems to build confidence and develop problem-solving strategies.

Is it important to fully understand the "Problem from Griffiths"?

As a scientist, it is important to have a strong understanding of all concepts and problems in your field, including the "Problem from Griffiths". This problem may be used in exams or as a basis for more complex problems, so having a solid understanding of it is crucial for success in the subject.

Are there any resources available for help with the "Problem from Griffiths"?

Yes, there are many resources available for help with the "Problem from Griffiths". These include online forums, tutoring services, and study groups. Your professor or teaching assistant may also be able to provide additional guidance and support.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
148
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
185
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
138
Replies
4
Views
977
  • Classical Physics
Replies
15
Views
531
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
469
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
905
Replies
6
Views
951
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top