Exploring Time: Is Time Just an Illusion?

In summary, this conversation discusses the concept of time and how it is perceived differently in dreams compared to physical reality. It is suggested that our perception of time is based on the processing speed of our brain, and during dreams, the brain processes ideas more freely rather than interpreting the environment. Therefore, the brain may believe that a longer period of time has passed in a dream than what was actually experienced. This raises questions about the difference between believing something and actually knowing it, as well as the objectivity of time.
  • #1
DMuitW
26
0
This thread leans a bit towards the "Is time just an illusion?" topic, but is somehow different.

In physical reality, time seems to derole as an objective constant. We experience time as constant intervals and we all do that the same way otherwise interaction with someone else would be hard (image you live at time rate 1x and someone else experiences time as 1,5x).
So some physical law somehow dictates us a certain rate of time for all waking conciousness and is applicable for objective reality

However, if this would be the general case, why is it that dreams we enjoy only last seconds to minutes while they are actually experienced as i.e. days or longer periods of time that they actually last.

Somehow this time objectivity is broken as we do not experience the same rate of time in our dreams as in physical reality.

So I wonder what this means?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Dreams are not real events, so time doesn't exist in them.
 
  • #3
Somehow this time objectivity is broken as we do not experience the same rate of time in our dreams as in physical reality.
How does one measure that? The time you experience in a dream, is actually what you remember experiencing when you wake, you arent able to measure your observations of time when you are dreaming.

Dreams are not real events, so time doesn't exist in them.
What you do mean by this?
 
  • #4
DMuitW said:
This thread leans a bit towards the "Is time just an illusion?" topic, but is somehow different.

In physical reality, time seems to derole as an objective constant. We experience time as constant intervals and we all do that the same way otherwise interaction with someone else would be hard (image you live at time rate 1x and someone else experiences time as 1,5x).
So some physical law somehow dictates us a certain rate of time for all waking conciousness and is applicable for objective reality

And here it is reasonable to assume that this rate is basically depending on the rate at which the natural recognition processes in the brain proceed. The physical activity in the brain does have a limited speed after all, and while something looks "very fast" to us, it is just a case of it being fast in relation to the recognition speed of the brain. As a noumenon, whatever we perceived cannot be said to have been "fast or slow".

However, if this would be the general case, why is it that dreams we enjoy only last seconds to minutes while they are actually experienced as i.e. days or longer periods of time that they actually last.

Somehow this time objectivity is broken as we do not experience the same rate of time in our dreams as in physical reality.

So I wonder what this means?

Being aware of the "flow of time" is not an objective phenomenon but rather you make certain assumptions about the passage of time based on interpreting some sensory data (so sometimes time seems to pass very fast and sometimes very slowly)

Whatever you are conscious of is a case of some ideas being expressed in the brain (in some sense or another). When you are conscious of a dream, it is also case of something being expressed in the brain.

During a dream the brain is not interpreting its environment but rather processing ideas more freely. If it goes through, for example, just few events that "happen during a course of a day", it can go through just these few events at regular processing speeds, and in the end simply believe that the whole day has occurred, while more properly only few events were ever processed.

What is the difference between merely believing something experienced is so, and actually knowing something is so? The difference is that former is possible, and latter is not.

So my answer to your question is that the brain merely believes a full day was experienced as it has a recollection of these memories of the events it just processed, and the memories say "event 1 happened in the morning, event 2 at noon, and event 3 in the evening". (You only remember certain events of your dream, not second-by-second description of the "whole day")

-Anssi
 
  • #5
AnssiH said:
And here it is reasonable to assume that this rate is basically depending on the rate at which the natural recognition processes in the brain proceed. The physical activity in the brain does have a limited speed after all, and while something looks "very fast" to us, it is just a case of it being fast in relation to the recognition speed of the brain. As a noumenon, whatever we perceived cannot be said to have been "fast or slow".



Being aware of the "flow of time" is not an objective phenomenon but rather you make certain assumptions about the passage of time based on interpreting some sensory data (so sometimes time seems to pass very fast and sometimes very slowly)

Whatever you are conscious of is a case of some ideas being expressed in the brain (in some sense or another). When you are conscious of a dream, it is also case of something being expressed in the brain.

During a dream the brain is not interpreting its environment but rather processing ideas more freely. If it goes through, for example, just few events that "happen during a course of a day", it can go through just these few events at regular processing speeds, and in the end simply believe that the whole day has occurred, while more properly only few events were ever processed.

What is the difference between merely believing something experienced is so, and actually knowing something is so? The difference is that former is possible, and latter is not.

So my answer to your question is that the brain merely believes a full day was experienced as it has a recollection of these memories of the events it just processed, and the memories say "event 1 happened in the morning, event 2 at noon, and event 3 in the evening". (You only remember certain events of your dream, not second-by-second description of the "whole day")

-Anssi

That is very true!

I play music when I sleep and I can attest that time experienced my during sleep occurs at the same rate as when I'm awake. When ever there is an interview on the radio or on my computer during my vivid dreams, my brain is able to pick that up in real time and merge that info with my dream. This is no philosophizing, but it is for me a hard empirical fact that dream time and wake time is the same. The only difference is that it is possible to go to a different day, year, etc. during a dream, but to think that is happing in real life is a form of delusion.
 

1. What is the concept of time and how is it measured?

Time is a fundamental concept in physics and refers to the progression of events from the past to the present and into the future. It is typically measured using units such as seconds, minutes, hours, and years.

2. Is time a physical entity or just a human construct?

This is a highly debated question in the scientific community. Some physicists believe that time is a fundamental aspect of the universe, while others argue that it is a human construct based on our perception of events and the way we measure them.

3. How does the theory of relativity impact our understanding of time?

The theory of relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein, states that time is not absolute but is relative to the observer's frame of reference. This means that time can appear to pass differently for different observers depending on their relative speeds and positions in space.

4. Can time travel be possible?

The concept of time travel is a popular topic in science fiction, but it is currently not possible according to our current understanding of physics. While the theory of relativity allows for the possibility of time dilation, which could make it seem like time is moving slower or faster, true time travel into the past or future is not supported by scientific evidence.

5. How does the perception of time differ among individuals?

Our perception of time can vary greatly among individuals based on factors such as age, culture, and personal experiences. It is also influenced by external factors such as stress and distractions. This is why time can seem to pass differently for different people in the same situation.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
95
Views
4K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
878
Back
Top