CIA rigged at least one Nobel Prize

  • News
  • Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Nobel prize
In summary: Russian text and gave it to the Nobel committee ... which was needed because the Nobel Committee only considers original-language texts.
  • #1
fourier jr
765
13
they've also been involved in book publishing:

January 10, 2009, 21:55
Nobel Prize ‘stolen’ by CIA
If you think the US intelligence agency, the CIA, has no interest in literature, you are very much mistaken. According to Italy’s La Stampa newspaper, it played a decisive role in giving the Nobel Prize to Russia’s Boris Pasternak, the author of Doctor Zhivago, instead of Italian writer Alberto Moravia.


Back in 1958 the three big names in the running for the Nobel Prize were Alberto Moravia, Boris Pasternak and Denmark’s Karen Blixen. Pasternak suddenly got the support of Anders Esterling, the Academy permanent secretary. His colleagues were surprised. After all, the Russian author had already been nominated in 1946 for his novel “Doctor Zhivago”, which was forbidden in the Soviet Union. Then the opinion of Slavic expert Anton Kalgren was taken into account. He claimed Pasternak’s books are not understandable for many people.

In light of this, the Nobel Academy lost interest in Pasternak’s work. But unexpectedly in 1957 Harry Martinson described him as the most outstanding Soviet writer of the century. That, according to La Stampa, was because the West found out that “Doctor Zhivago” was banned in the author’s Motherland, making Pasternak popular again. His book became known in the West after it was smuggled out of Russia and published in Italy.

But in 1958, as La Stampa notes, Moravia had the advantage. In Sweden, where the Academy is based, his works were widely known, but Pasternak’s famous novel hadn’t been published yet. Esterling read it in Italian and said its author was “one of the most outstanding writers of our time”.

But finally, according to La Stampa, it was the CIA that decided the winner. A CIA lobby operating in the Swedish Academy wanted to annoy the USSR by giving the award to a dissident writer. So, it was Pasternak who became the Nobel Prize that year. But victory turned to personal tragedy for Pasternak himself. In the USSR it was made clear he was free to go to Stockholm to get his award – but if he did, he was told, he wouldn’t be allowed back home. That was something the writer, who was deeply attached to his homeland, couldn’t bear, so he didn’t receive the prize. Two year later, when he was dying, he confessed he would have been happy to get it. In 1961 he was rehabilitated in the Soviet Union, but “Doctor Zhivago” wasn’t published in the USSR until 1988.

Italy was compensated the following year, when writer Salvatore Quasimodo was awarded the prestigious literary prize.
http://www.russiatoday.com/features/news/35742

& here's RIA Novosti's coverage, which is more in-depth:
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20090119/119705315.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
the CIA did nothing more than steal and publish the original Russian text

fourier jr said:
CIA rigged at least one Nobel Prize

Hi Fourier jr! :smile:

erm … your quotations are from a sensationalised English-language summary of a rather biased Italian account in La Stampa (http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmsSezioni/cultura/200901articoli/39884girata.asp

It gives the impression that CIA pressure achieved the Nobel prize for Pasternak …

but all the CIA did was steal a copy of the original Russian text, and present it to the Nobel committee …

this was needed because the Nobel Committee only considers original-language texts, and Russia wasn't allowing any out of the country. :rolleyes:

From your other link:
The aircraft carrying a passenger with a copy of the novel was ordered to land in the airport of Malta in the Mediterranean. The pilot apologized for the stopover. The annoyed passengers went to the airport's departure lounge, while CIA agents found the right suitcase, took out the text, and photographed it page by page. They put the text back into the suitcase, and two hours later the aircraft was airborne again. The passengers arrived at their destination. The owner of the suitcase was in blissful ignorance of what had happened with it.

However, under the Nobel Committee's rules, the novel had to be in the original. Here the CIA-copied version came in handy. Every hour counted in what was a now-or-never situation. Through proxy funds, the CIA gave money to urgently publish the novel in Russian. To cover up the traces of stealing, the CIA made galleys from the photocopies and printed the Russian version in the academic publishing house of Muton in the Hague without any copyrights in the August of 1958.

The Swedish Academy had no more obstacles for awarding Pasternak, and on October 23, 1958 the Nobel cannon shot at the Soviet government. Pasternak received a Nobel Prize for outstanding merits in modern lyric poetry and for continuing the traditions of the great Russian novel.

Pasternak then won the prize on his own merits.

The CIA did not "rig" the Nobel prize :frown:

they only made eligible a book which would have been a walkover from the start had Pasternak's own country not suppressed it. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What evidence is there to support the claim that the CIA rigged a Nobel Prize?

There is currently no evidence to support this claim. The CIA has denied any involvement in rigging a Nobel Prize and there is no credible source or documentation to back up this accusation.

2. Why would the CIA rig a Nobel Prize?

There is no clear motive for the CIA to rig a Nobel Prize. The Nobel Committee is made up of independent individuals who are not influenced by any government or organization. It is highly unlikely that the CIA would risk their reputation and credibility by attempting to manipulate the selection process.

3. Has the Nobel Committee or any other organization investigated these allegations?

There is no record of the Nobel Committee or any other organization launching an investigation into these allegations. The Nobel Prize selection process is highly transparent and any attempts to rig it would likely be caught and exposed by the Committee or other organizations.

4. Are there any past instances of the CIA attempting to rig a Nobel Prize?

No, there are no known instances of the CIA attempting to rig a Nobel Prize. The Nobel Prize has been awarded since 1901 and there have been no reports or evidence of any attempts by the CIA or any other organization to manipulate the selection process.

5. What are the consequences if the CIA were found to have rigged a Nobel Prize?

If the CIA were found to have rigged a Nobel Prize, it would be a major scandal and could potentially damage the reputation and credibility of the Nobel Committee. It could also lead to legal action and sanctions against the CIA and individuals involved in the manipulation. However, as there is currently no evidence to support this claim, it is purely speculative and hypothetical.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top