| New Reply |
Another really basic question... this time regarding integration. |
Share Thread |
| Jun13-12, 09:20 PM | #1 |
|
|
Another really basic question... this time regarding integration.
Given a function f define a new function Sf(x) by summing up all values of f(hj)
where 0 ≤ jh < x. That is, if k is such that kh is the largest below x, then Sf(x) = h[ f(0) + f(h) + f(2h) + .... + f(kh) ] We call Sf also the ”integral” or ”antiderivative” of f. The teacher who wrote the lecture notes I'm reading through gives an example of integration. He evaluates Sf(x) for f(x)=1. I don't understand the first sentence: We have Sf(x) = 0 for x ≤ h. Why? Sorry for being such a n00b, but I don't understand. Please help me. Thanks, Mathguy By the way, he verifies that the js in the definition are integers. |
| Jun13-12, 10:52 PM | #2 |
|
|
Is that word-for-word what is written there? 0 ≤ kh < x ≤ h is when k=0. So Sf(x) = h f(0) = h. Edit: Maybe he means x < 0? |
| Jun14-12, 09:56 AM | #3 |
|
|
Well, Yes, that is word-for-word, but I think he's doing a "preliminary" definition before the real definition. And I was thinking the same thing, because Sf(x) isn't defined for x<0.
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Another really basic question... this time regarding integration.
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Extremely Basic Question Regarding Time Dilation | Special & General Relativity | 6 | ||
| Basic question about how spin changes in time | Quantum Physics | 3 | ||
| Basic time dilation question | Special & General Relativity | 5 | ||
| Basic question about the nature of light and time | Special & General Relativity | 5 | ||
| Basic Question about space-time | Astrophysics | 2 | ||