Possible 2000 Presidential Election Fraud?

  • News
  • Thread starter ksle82
  • Start date
In summary, there was a video on YouTube about a man named Clinton Curtis testifying on vote-rigging software. He is considered credible according to his Wikipedia page. Some people find this shocking and wonder why major news outlets did not cover it at the time. However, it was later revealed that the "testimony" was actually a staged deposition by conspiracy theorists and therefore not admissible in court. It was ultimately deemed worthless from a judicial point of view.
  • #1
ksle82
30
0
I came upon this video on youutbe about a man named clinton curtis testifying on vote-rigging software: [MEDIA=youtube]PrwToR2RpEI[/MEDIA][/URL]


He seems to be very credible: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Curtis

I thought this is pretty shocking. just wondering why major news weren't covering this at the time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Who knows but it's too late to change the election results of 2000.
 
  • #3
What is shocking about this?

Btw, "testify" implies a court - I'm guessing this is that mock court that was staged by conspiracy theorists a while back (you can't take a handheld video camera into a real court). Its an interview.
 
  • #4
russ_watters said:
What is shocking about this?

Btw, "testify" implies a court - I'm guessing this is that mock court that was staged by conspiracy theorists a while back (you can't take a handheld video camera into a real court). Its an interview.

On the contrary, depositions are by definition testimony taken outside of court. But you're essentially right, what we have hear is the usual Congressional minority circle jerk getting together and deposing whatever crackheads they want. It's not a Congressional hearing, none of the deposing participants have subpeona power, and barring some significant discovery is ultimately worthless from a judicial point of view. The most that could ever come of these exercises is that some Congresscritter will drop it into the record or some blogger or board poster will attempt to pass it off as a supporting primary source.
 
  • #5
This thread does not meet the criteria for posting.
 

1. What evidence is there of possible election fraud in the 2000 Presidential Election?

There were several instances of possible election fraud in the 2000 Presidential Election, including discrepancies in voting machine counts, illegal purging of voter rolls, and allegations of voter intimidation and suppression.

2. Did the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore contribute to potential election fraud?

The Supreme Court's decision to stop the recount in Florida and declare George W. Bush the winner of the election has been cited as a contributing factor to potential election fraud. This decision effectively halted the investigation into irregularities in the voting process.

3. Were there any investigations into the potential election fraud in 2000?

There were several investigations into the potential election fraud in 2000, including a congressional inquiry and a civil rights investigation by the Department of Justice. However, these investigations were limited in scope and did not result in any major findings or consequences.

4. How did the media coverage of the 2000 Presidential Election contribute to possible election fraud?

The media's early call of the election for George W. Bush may have discouraged some voters from casting their ballots, potentially leading to a lower turnout and affecting the outcome of the election. Additionally, biased or inaccurate reporting may have influenced public perception of the election and its legitimacy.

5. Has any progress been made in preventing election fraud since the 2000 Presidential Election?

Efforts have been made to improve election security and prevent fraud since the 2000 Presidential Election, such as implementing paper ballots and auditing procedures. However, there are still concerns about the integrity of the voting process, as seen in recent allegations of election tampering and foreign interference.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top