About the proof of Noether Theorem

In summary, the Noether Theorem's proof requires that the action before transformation is equal to the action after transformation. This is necessary for both internal and spacetime symmetries. For spacetime symmetries, the invariance condition is that of the action integral, while for internal symmetries, a form-invariant Lagrangian is sufficient. However, the invariance condition is given by the action integral for both types of symmetries. Breaking any of the three conditions in Goldstein's proof will result in a different equation form after variables' transformation.
  • #1
princeton118
33
0
In the general Noether Theorem's proof, it is required that the action before transformation is equal to the action after transformation: I = I'.
Who can tell me why this condition has to be used. In my opinion, we can obtain the same form of the motion equation after the transformation only if the Lagrangian density has the same functional form. We don't have to use this scale-invariance condition. If we don't use this condition, can we still obtain the same form of the equation?PS:Which book gives a clear proof of the Noether Theorem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
princeton118 said:
In the general Noether Theorem's proof, it is required that the action before transformation is equal to the action after transformation: I = I'.
Who can tell me why this condition has to be used.
Because, the numerical value of the Lagrangian and the action integral is invariant under translation of cyclic coordinates.

In my opinion, we can obtain the same form of the motion equation after the transformation only if the Lagrangian density has the same functional form. We don't have to use this scale-invariance condition.
How would you obtain the same form of the motion equation?

PS:Which book gives a clear proof of the Noether Theorem?
Have you read the discussion of the proof in Goldstein?
 
  • #3
I have read the book written by Goldstein, but I still have some questions.
In Goldstein's book, he gave two restricts about the symmetry. What puzzles me is the relationship between the form invariance of equations and these two restricts.

Thanks for your explanation!
 
Last edited:
  • #4
The Lagrangian is only defined up to a total time derivative - such terms do not affect the equations of motion. Therefore, the Lagrangian need not be invariant for Noether's theorem to work, but be invariant up to total derivatives. By making the action invariant, you automatically take this into account. Furthermore, the final "total derivative" that the Lagrangian changes by is nothing more than the Noether current - that quantity which is conserved by the symmetry. So the proof is constructive - it gives you the conservation law for free.
 
  • #5
princeton118 said:
In the general Noether Theorem's proof, it is required that the action before transformation is equal to the action after transformation: I = I'.
Who can tell me why this condition has to be used. In my opinion, we can obtain the same form of the motion equation after the transformation only if the Lagrangian density has the same functional form.

If you are dealing with INTERNAL symmetries, then yes, form-invariant Lagrangian is sufficient for proving Noether theorem. Indeed, in this case, the invariance condition is given by

[tex]\delta \mathcal{L} = 0 \ \ (1)[/tex]

However, for space-time symmetries, Eq(1) does not lead to the correct Noether current; The missing term comes partly from the change in the spacetime region overwhich the action integral is taken. So, for spacetime symmetries, the invariance condition is that of the action integral.

We don't have to use this scale-invariance condition.

What do you mean by scale-invariant?




PS:Which book gives a clear proof of the Noether Theorem?

See post #12 in

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=172461

regards

sam
 
  • #6
I see, thank you all.
 
  • #7
I have the same problem. There are 3 conditions in the Goldstein's proof. If we break the second condition, we cannot obtain the same equation form after the variables' transformation. What if we break the third condition? Why we have to introduce this condition? Thx.
 

1. What is Noether's Theorem?

Noether's Theorem is a fundamental result in physics and mathematics that states that for every continuous symmetry in a physical system, there exists a corresponding conserved quantity. In other words, the laws of nature are invariant under certain transformations, and this leads to the existence of conserved quantities such as energy, momentum, and angular momentum.

2. Who was Emmy Noether?

Emmy Noether was a German mathematician who lived in the early 20th century. She made significant contributions to the fields of abstract algebra and theoretical physics. Noether's Theorem is named after her because she was the first to prove it in a general form.

3. How does Noether's Theorem relate to symmetries?

Noether's Theorem states that for every continuous symmetry in a physical system, there exists a corresponding conserved quantity. In other words, symmetries in a physical system can be used to identify conserved quantities, which are essential for understanding the dynamics of the system.

4. What is the significance of Noether's Theorem?

Noether's Theorem has significant implications in both physics and mathematics. In physics, it helps us understand the fundamental laws of nature and the conservation of important quantities such as energy and momentum. In mathematics, it has led to the development of new theories and techniques, particularly in the fields of abstract algebra and differential geometry.

5. How is Noether's Theorem used in physics?

Noether's Theorem is used extensively in theoretical physics, particularly in fields such as classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and field theory. It is used to derive and understand the conservation laws that govern physical systems. It also plays a crucial role in the development of new theories and models in physics.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
542
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
728
Replies
5
Views
691
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
996
Replies
3
Views
846
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
854
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
9
Views
603
Back
Top