What is meant by saying that the Goldstone-bosons are eaten by gauge bosons?

In summary, the Goldstone-bosons are "eaten" by gauge bosons. This is done by parameterizing the Lagrangian so that only the derivatives of the phase field are dependent on the gauge field. This eliminates the field, which in turn allows for the interaction between the massive real scalar field and the massive real vector field.
  • #1
FredMadison
47
0
What is meant by saying that the Goldstone-bosons are "eaten" by gauge bosons?

I've seen this statement all over, but can't find a good explanation of what this actually means. Anyone care to shed some light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


To see how this works, let's consider a specific example of a complex scalar field, [itex]\phi[/itex], coupled to an abelian gauge field. The complex scalar has 2 real degrees of freedom, while the massless gauge field also has 2 real degrees of freedom after imposing gauge invariance. A massive abelian vector field has 3 real degrees of freedom, which will become important below.

If the scalar potential only depends on the modulus of the scalar field, [itex]V(\phi) = V(|\phi|)[/itex], then the Lagrangian has a continuous symmetry amounting to rescaling [itex]\phi[/itex] by a phase, [itex] \phi \rightarrow e^{i\theta} \phi[/itex]. Now suppose that this potential has a minimum at [itex]|\phi|=\upsilon[/itex]. We say that the symmetry is spontaneously broken because the vacuum state [itex]\langle \phi \rangle = \upsilon[/itex] is no longer invariant under the phase symmetry of the Lagrangian.

If we parameterize

[itex]\phi = (\rho + \upsilon) e^{i\alpha},[/itex]

we find that the Lagrangian only depends on the derivatives [itex]\partial_\mu \alpha[/itex] of the phase field. So [itex]\alpha[/itex] is a massless real scalar, while [itex]\rho[/itex] is a massive real scalar field. Furthermore, there is an continuous invariance where [itex]\alpha \rightarrow \alpha + c[/itex], which is nothing more than the phase symmetry of the theory. If there were no gauge field coupled to [itex]\phi[/itex], we would identify [itex]\alpha[/itex] with the Goldstone boson corresponding to the spontaneous breaking of the phase symmetry of the complex field.

However, in the presence of the gauge field, the total theory has a local gauge invariance [itex] \phi \rightarrow e^{i\theta(x)} \phi[/itex], [itex]A_\mu \rightarrow A_\mu - i \partial_\mu \theta(x)[/itex]. We are free to use this gauge invariance to set [itex]\theta = -\alpha[/itex]. This eliminates the field [itex]\alpha[/itex] from the Lagranian entirely, leaving terms for the massive [itex]\rho[/itex] and massive vector field [itex]A_\mu[/itex] and their interactions. The 2+2 real degrees of freedom we started with are now distributed as 1 real d.o.f. for [itex]\rho[/itex] and the 3 real d.o.f. for the massive gauge field.

The use of the gauge symmetry to eliminate the phase [itex]\alpha[/itex] in favor of the extra degree of freedom for the massive gauge field is what's referred to as "eating" the Goldstone boson.
 
  • #3
Look at the Mexican hat potential as described in fzero's post: http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v7/n1/images/nphys1874-f1.jpg

w/o a gauge field you would have a physical 'angular degree of freedom' rolling in the well with mass zero. But with a gauge field the 'angular degree of freedom' is no longer physical b/c this 'rolling' is just a gauge transformation and can be rotated away. So this angular zero-mass Goldstone mode 'is eaten' by the gauge boson.
 
  • #4


Ok, I think I see how this works. Very clear answers, thank you!
 

1. What are Goldstone-bosons and gauge bosons?

Goldstone-bosons and gauge bosons are both types of elementary particles. Goldstone-bosons are associated with the breaking of symmetry in a physical system, while gauge bosons are carriers of the fundamental forces of nature, such as the photon for electromagnetism and the gluon for the strong nuclear force.

2. What is the relationship between Goldstone-bosons and gauge bosons?

In some theories, the Goldstone-bosons are thought to be "eaten" by the gauge bosons during the process of symmetry breaking. This means that the Goldstone-bosons become part of the gauge bosons, giving them mass and changing their properties.

3. What is meant by "eaten" in this context?

"Eaten" is a metaphor used in physics to describe the process of one particle being absorbed by another, resulting in changes to the absorbed particle's properties. In the case of Goldstone-bosons and gauge bosons, the Goldstone-bosons are absorbed by the gauge bosons, giving them mass and changing their properties.

4. Why is the concept of "eating" important in particle physics?

The concept of "eating" is important because it helps explain how particles acquire mass and how their properties can change. It is also a fundamental aspect of certain theories, such as the Higgs mechanism, which is used to explain the origin of mass in the universe.

5. Is the concept of "eating" applicable to other particles besides Goldstone-bosons and gauge bosons?

Yes, the concept of "eating" can be applied to other particles, specifically in theories that involve symmetry breaking. For example, the W and Z bosons, which are responsible for the weak nuclear force, are thought to have "eaten" the Higgs boson, which gives them mass.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
783
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top