Can one approximate an ether frame by analyzing superimposed rotating frames?

In summary, the concept of an "ether" frame cannot be accurately approximated through the analysis of superimposed rotating frames due to the lack of empirical evidence and theoretical framework supporting the existence of an ether.
  • #1
kmarinas86
979
1
Can one approximate an "ether" frame by analyzing "superimposed" rotating frames?

If we assume the axiom that all motion is ultimately curved, however small the curvature, it would appear that for every momentum you are going to have a radial vector associated with the non-zero deflection of that momentum. If I understand correctly, the "points" from which the all such radial vectors exist (centers of rotation) would be moving inertially with respect to one another. These points are not to be confused with actual presence of mass of course. For example, there is no special mass existing between Pluto and Charon, even though their collective axis of rotation exists between them and outside both of them. If I plotted the movements of these "points" (centers of rotation), versus the movements of the momenta that compose of this rotation, which are all relative to the motion of an arbitrary inertial observer, I would find that the RMS velocity of the momenta is greater than the RMS velocity of these "points" (centers of rotation), independent of the observer in question.

It would be natural to consider then the local rotations that these "points" (centers of rotation) create as a result of their parallel motion, anti-parallel motion, and motion between these extremes. By assigning mass to each moving "point" (center of rotation), we have another system of linear momentum. If we say there is unknown mass beyond that system, then it is likely that this finite system we consider has an overall motion whose velocity and radius is defined in the context of that greater system. However, like earlier, the RMS velocity of parts is greater than the RMS velocity of the whole.

What happens if we extend this relationship to infinity? The RMS velocity of the system would be asymptotically closer to zero at the largest scales, which is self-evident in the case that population of momenta consists of particles that cannot go any faster (i.e. [itex]c[/itex]). This would appear to be the means of deriving an approximation to a "rest" frame from the viewpoint of a trivial "ether" that we cannot detect in practice.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I would approach this question by first analyzing the concept of an "ether" frame and the idea of superimposed rotating frames. The concept of an ether frame is based on the idea of a stationary medium through which all matter moves. This concept was proposed in the 19th century to explain the propagation of light, but has since been disproven by numerous experiments and the development of Einstein's theory of relativity.

On the other hand, the idea of superimposed rotating frames is based on the assumption that all motion is ultimately curved. While this may be true in some cases, it is not a universal law and there are many instances where objects move in straight lines. Additionally, the concept of "points" of rotation and their associated radial vectors is not a widely accepted or proven concept in physics.

In order to approximate an "ether" frame, we would need to have a clear understanding of the properties and behavior of this hypothetical medium. Without any empirical evidence or theoretical framework to support the existence of an ether, it is difficult to make any meaningful analysis or approximation.

Furthermore, even if we were to assume the existence of an ether, the idea of superimposed rotating frames would not necessarily lead to an approximation of it. The concept of an ether is based on a stationary medium, while superimposed rotating frames suggest a dynamic and constantly changing system. It is unclear how these two concepts could be reconciled in a meaningful way.

In conclusion, as a scientist, I would approach the idea of approximating an "ether" frame through superimposed rotating frames with caution and skepticism. Without a solid theoretical framework and empirical evidence, it is difficult to make any meaningful analysis or approximation. It is important to base our understanding of the universe on sound scientific principles and evidence, rather than speculative or unproven concepts.
 

What is an ether frame?

An ether frame refers to a hypothetical stationary medium that exists in space and was once believed to be the necessary medium for the propagation of electromagnetic waves. This theory has since been disproven by the theory of relativity.

What does it mean to approximate an ether frame?

To approximate an ether frame means to try and understand the properties and behaviors of the hypothetical ether medium, even though it has been proven not to exist. This can be done by analyzing other frames of reference, such as rotating frames.

What are rotating frames?

Rotating frames refer to frames of reference that are rotating or moving in a circular motion. They can be used to model and understand the behavior of objects in a rotating system, such as planets orbiting a star.

How can rotating frames be used to approximate an ether frame?

By superimposing multiple rotating frames and analyzing their combined effects, scientists can get a better understanding of the properties and behaviors that an ether frame would have if it existed. This can provide insights into the nature of space and the propagation of electromagnetic waves.

What are the implications of approximating an ether frame?

Approximating an ether frame can help scientists gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental principles of space and the laws of physics. It can also lead to advancements in fields such as astronomy and astrophysics, where understanding the behavior of rotating systems is crucial.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
672
  • Mechanics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
930
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
635
Replies
8
Views
948
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
643
Back
Top