Why does resistance change in fluid flow from laminar to turbulent conditions?

In summary: Thanks for helping clarify.In summary, the resistance of a fluid moving through a tube changes from being determined by viscosity in conditions of laminar flow to being determined by density in conditions of turbulent flow due to the increase in mixing and higher eddy viscosity in turbulent flow. This results in a flatter velocity profile in the central region of the flow and a steeper profile near the wall, leading to a higher pressure drop in turbulent flow compared to laminar flow.
  • #1
SBMDStudent
4
0
I was hoping someone could give me an explanation as to why resistance of a fluid moving through a tube changes from being determined by viscosity in conditions of laminar flow to being determined by density in conditions of turbulent flow.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
perhaps this article from wikipedia will help:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laminar_flow

and for turbulent flow:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbulence

laminar flow makes certain assumptions about the fluid that aren't true when the flow increases beyond a certain point. These assumptions help to minimize some terms in the Navier Stokes equation which describes all types of flows and makes it possible to solve for it for the simpler laminar flow.

Lastly, Navier-Stokes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier-Stokes_equations
 
Last edited:
  • #3
SBMDStudent said:
I was hoping someone could give me an explanation as to why resistance of a fluid moving through a tube changes from being determined by viscosity in conditions of laminar flow to being determined by density in conditions of turbulent flow.
Thanks in advance.

Hi SBMDStudent. Welcome to Physics Forums.

In turbulent flow, the local fluid velocity vector is time dependent, and has rapidly fluctuating components in all directions. Parcels of fluid cross the mean streamlines in both directions, and carry momentum across the streamlines. So parcels from faster moving regions cross into slower moving regions, and vice versa. The net result is transport of momentum perpendicular to the streamlines, over and above that from viscous shear. This translates into higher flow resistance. See Transport Phenomena by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot.

Chet
 
  • #4
Thank you for the help. I don't have much in the way of physics information to offer back, but I'm happy to answer anything in the area of medicine.
 
  • #5
In the entry region where the flow is laminar, the pressure drop (or flow resistance if that is what you prefer to call it) should depend on more than just the viscosity. In fact, you can get the pressure drop exactly in the laminar case (subject to several assumptions) using the Hagen-Poiseuille equation, which shows that the pressure drop is actually related to the viscosity, the flow rate and the size of the tube, not just the viscosity.

When the flow transitions to turbulence, as mentioned before, there is a lot of mixing involved and this tends to create a more highly curved velocity profile than the laminar case. Since the flow resistance is related to the velocity gradient at the walls, a turbulent flow will have a greater pressure drop than an equivalent laminar boundary layer. Still, it will not only depend on density in general. It will have similar dependencies to the laminar case, though with different relationships between parameters.

It sounds to me like whatever source you are getting this from is making some additional assumptions or applying a special case. What exactly does it say about this topic?
 
  • #6
boneh3ad said:
When the flow transitions to turbulence, as mentioned before, there is a lot of mixing involved and this tends to create a more highly curved velocity profile than the laminar case. Since the flow resistance is related to the velocity gradient at the walls, a turbulent flow will have a greater pressure drop than an equivalent laminar boundary layer. Still, it will not only depend on density in general. It will have similar dependencies to the laminar case, though with different relationships between parameters.

Actually, for turbulent flow in a tube, the mean axial velocity profile is flatter than in laminar flow near the center of the tube and steeper near the wall. See BSL Transport Phenomena. Because of the turbulent mixing involved away from the wall, the eddy viscosity away from the wall is much higher than the actual shear viscosity of the fluid. This causes the velocity profile to be flatter away from the wall. Near the wall, in the laminar sub-layer, the turbulent fluctuations are surpressed, and the shear rate is higher than in laminar flow.

Chet
 
  • #7
All of which is supported by what I just said, particularly in light of the fact that the wall shear stress that gives rise to pressure drop is dependent on the wall-normal velocity gradient at the wall.
 
  • #8
boneh3ad said:
All of which is supported by what I just said, particularly in light of the fact that the wall shear stress that gives rise to pressure drop is dependent on the wall-normal velocity gradient at the wall.
It think we are in total agreement. The only thing I was really questioning was the statement the velocity profile in turbulent flow is more curved than in laminar flow. I wanted to clarify that it is actually flatter in the central region of the flow.
 
  • #9
It is more sharply curved where it counts, near the wall.
 
  • #10
boneh3ad said:
It is more sharply curved where it counts, near the wall.
Agreed (again). I was strictly endeavoring to be more precise and avoid confusion for those new to this material.
 

What is the difference between laminar and turbulent flow?

Laminar flow is a type of fluid motion that occurs when a fluid moves in a smooth, orderly manner. In contrast, turbulent flow is a type of fluid motion that occurs when a fluid moves in an irregular, chaotic manner.

What causes laminar and turbulent flow?

Laminar flow is typically caused by low fluid velocity, low fluid viscosity, and/or small pipe diameters. Turbulent flow is typically caused by high fluid velocity, high fluid viscosity, and/or large pipe diameters.

How can you tell if flow is laminar or turbulent?

The Reynolds number is used to determine whether flow is laminar or turbulent. If the Reynolds number is less than 2000, the flow is considered laminar. If the Reynolds number is greater than 4000, the flow is considered turbulent. Between 2000 and 4000, the flow may transition between laminar and turbulent.

What are the characteristics of laminar and turbulent flow?

Laminar flow is characterized by smooth, parallel layers of fluid that do not mix or swirl. Turbulent flow is characterized by mixing and swirling of fluid layers, resulting in high levels of fluid mixing and energy dissipation.

What are the practical applications of laminar and turbulent flow?

Laminar flow is often desired in applications where a smooth flow is necessary, such as in certain chemical reactions or in the design of aircraft wings. Turbulent flow is often used in applications where mixing and energy dissipation are desired, such as in heat exchangers and in the generation of electricity through wind turbines.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
28
Views
744
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
952
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
732
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top