- #1
bentley4
- 66
- 0
A set is defined as a collection of 'objects'. Does there exist something that is not considered an object in mathmatics?
The reason why I ask is because when I look up the definition of a ring, it says a ring is an 'algebraic structure' existing of a set and 2 binary operations.
Why can't one say a ring is a set that includes 2 binary operations?
Do they give this definition because depicting an object of a set neglects semantics?
If that was true then we wouldn't be able to calculate anything with numbers, because numbers are just an agreed representation of a concept communicated through informal human language, right?
The reason why I ask is because when I look up the definition of a ring, it says a ring is an 'algebraic structure' existing of a set and 2 binary operations.
Why can't one say a ring is a set that includes 2 binary operations?
Do they give this definition because depicting an object of a set neglects semantics?
If that was true then we wouldn't be able to calculate anything with numbers, because numbers are just an agreed representation of a concept communicated through informal human language, right?