Age of Universe: Is There an Alternate Perception?

In summary, the age of the universe is usually discussed for an observer who is at rest relative to the average motion of matter and radiation, in the context of homogeneous models which do not include structures like black holes. However, for an observer on a black hole, the universe would appear much younger. Different observers can measure different ages of the universe on their clocks, and observations are relative and equally valid. It is not possible for anything to come out of a black hole according to our current understanding.
  • #1
Holland
2
0
I was wondering if, immediately following the expansion of the universe there might have been objects of matter with immense gravity like that of a black hole. For the observer on such an object that still exists, what would the age of the universe be?

You could substitue this with an object that formed 1 billion years after tbb. Wouldnt their observation be dramatically different yet equally valid?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The age of the universe as usually discussed is for an observer who is at rest relative to the average motion of the matter and radiation in the universe (the "Hubble flow"), and is in the context of homogeneous models, which wouldn't include any structure such as black holes, etc. Yes, you're right, different observers can measure different ages of the universe on their clocks. You can't be "on" a black hole, but an observer hovering just outside a black hole's event horizon would say that according to her clock, the universe is very young. There is no limit on how young the universe could be according to such an observer. The same applies to an observer moving at nearly the speed of light relative to the Hubble flow.
 
  • #3
...immediately following the expansion of the universe there might have been objects of matter with immense gravity like that of a black hole.

you mean right after inflation ended...Actually it is far more likely everything back then was rather uniform radiation...it has taken gravity some time to form black holes...but crowells's reply covers many circumstances nicely.

Observed time passes differently according to the observer's velocity and local gravitational potential. Only the speed of light is constant for all inertail observers; most everything else depends on the frame of reference used...observations, in general, are relative, one as equally valid as another.
 
  • #4
An observer on such an object would have traveled backwards in time and would look at the universe being younger when he comes out of the hole, as anything inside a black hole travels faster than light, because black holes are shortcuts through space.
But what I say is impossible when this happens, imagine a guy entering a black hole when the universe is x years old, when he comes back if he had traveled 2x years backward, were would he be?
 
  • #5
when he comes out of the hole,

Nothing "comes out"...according to our best understanding.

"as anything inside a black hole travels faster than light, because black holes are shortcuts through space..."

untrue.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the current estimated age of the Universe?

The current estimated age of the Universe is approximately 13.8 billion years old.

2. How do scientists determine the age of the Universe?

Scientists use a variety of methods to determine the age of the Universe, including studying the expansion rate of the Universe, analyzing the cosmic microwave background radiation, and observing the ages of the oldest stars and galaxies.

3. Is it possible that the Universe is much older or younger than the estimated age?

While it is possible, it is highly unlikely that the estimated age of the Universe is significantly off. The current methods used to determine the age of the Universe have been extensively tested and have been found to be very accurate.

4. Is there any evidence for an alternate perception of the age of the Universe?

There is currently no scientific evidence for an alternate perception of the age of the Universe. The estimated age of 13.8 billion years is supported by multiple lines of evidence and has been confirmed by numerous scientific studies.

5. Could our understanding of the Universe change in the future, leading to a different perception of its age?

It is always possible that new discoveries and advancements in technology could lead to a better understanding of the Universe and potentially change our perception of its age. However, the current estimated age of the Universe is widely accepted by the scientific community and is not expected to change significantly in the near future.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
63
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
67
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
874
Replies
90
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top