Variable acceleration terminal velocity

In summary, the conversation is discussing the conditions required for a spaceship to have a safe landing. These conditions include an initial velocity of 1000 m/s, a height of 100 km from Earth, a total mass of 3000 kg, and rocket capabilities of 100 kg/s at MACH 5. The spaceship is under variable acceleration but constant gravitational pull, and the direction of up and down does not affect the calculations. The equations being used to solve for the safe landing include mg-kv-u=m*a and -m/k ln (mg-u-kv) = t+c. There is also mention of the density of air, thrust, temperature, and speed of sound in the calculations.
  • #1
kieran1black2
23
0
4 conditions
- initial velocity = 1000 m/s
- height from Earth = 100 km
- total mass = 3000 kg
- rocket capabilities (thrust) = 100 kg/s at MACH 5

i was told that to use viscous and laminar drag as two options and to keep mass constant (to simplify things a little).

the spaceship is under variable acceleration but constant gravitational pull.

it doesn't matter if up or down is negative or positive so long as the derivation and integration work.

*** the question is will the spaceship have a safe landing plan? or will it be able to approach the ground without crashing therefore when displacement = 100 000 m, velocity = 0****

can some one please help me? any help is greatly appreciated...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF, Kieran.
Initial velocity 1,000 m/s on what vector?
 
  • #3
assume that it is done in the same dimension (same plane)

i was given

mg-kv-u=m*a

where m=mass
g=gravity (10)
k=drag coefficient
u=thrust
a=acceleration

hope that helps a bit... if that helps
i found that when t = 0 v=1000 and therefore i can find k (and i assume that this stays constant)

i need this expression to be integrated (mg-kv-u=m*a) using either a=dv/dt or a=v*dv/ds

once this is integrated, we can find what t is equal to at anytime.
and then get v on one side and then find terminal velocity buy letting t approach infinity which makes e^(?)= 1

using that i can find the terminal velocity but its all the algebra that is confusing me...

try not to think about the world spinning around and in three dimensions

thanks for the reply
 
  • #4
mg is on the y-axis downwards but it has a positive value and up is negative... kv and u are both up on the y axis
 
  • #5
Good stuff. Unfortunately, I can be of absolutely no help to you. My math ability is limited to occassionally being able to balance my chequebook. I just had to make sure that all parameters were clearly defined so that the real scientists here wouldn't have to ask you themselves. The lack of direction for that initial velocity just struck me as being a stumbling block. :redface:
Anyhow, someone who can help will probably be along shortly. I'm going to bed.
 
  • #6
hey thanks for that though... please pass it on to someone that will be able to help me with the algebra

thanks again bye
 
  • #7
edit - changed speed of sound to 344m/s for 21 degress C, included thrust formula.

Ok, 100kg of expended fuel is ejected from the rocket engine at Mach 5 every second.

Thrust = (100 kg x 1720 m / sec^2) = 172,000 Newtons, agreed.

There's no coefficient of drag or frontal area given, so there's not enough information to figure out the drag data. In real life, because the equation for density of the air is complicated, this problem can't be converted into an equation. Instead, numerical integration is done (in very small increments of time) to predict ballistic paths.

On a side note:
Energy gained by the fuel in this case is 1/2 m v^2 so energy would be 1/2 (100 kg) (1720m/s)^2 = 147,920 kilo joules. Since this is done every second, this tranlates into 147,920 kilo watts (about 86.75 times as much power as the previous case).
 
Last edited:
  • #8
you're thinking about it way too literally...

the thrust is just saying that there is a force up of 172 000 N
im just a year 12 student in australia... don't expect me to now all this stuff lol...

all i know is i have to integrate mg-u-kv=m*a
-m/k ln (mg-u-kv) = t+c which i think is wrong my calculation for terminal velocity is 5 times the initial velocity
and from that get v on one side and find the terminal velocity when t approaches infinity...

value of v which i have as
v=(mg+u-ue^-t/100)/30

when t-->inifinity
e^-t/100=1
therefore
v=6733.33333 m/s
 
  • #9
Update

Thrust = (100 kg x 1720 m / sec^2) = 172,000 Newtons, agreed.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
thrust=dm/dt x V0=344x5 x 1000 = 172000N. I am talking about a basic scenario here, the model is very basic and a lot of assumptions need to be made. K is a constant, m is constant and g is constant. Density at 100km about sea level is negligable and MACH5 is constant no matter what altitude.
 
  • #11
> "(thrust)" = 100kg / sec at Mach 5

dm/dt = 100kg / sec. Speed is 344x5 m/s if temperature is 21C.

Thrust = (100 kg x 1720 m / sec^2) = 172,000 Newtons, agreed.

(I was confused when you wrote 344x5x1000 verus 344x5x100)...

> mach 5 is a constant

It becomes slower as altitude increases due to decrease in temperature, at altitude, temperature can be -55 C, and speed of sound 295 m/s. Temperature does start increasing again at very high altitudes though. You could have just stated the the exhaust velocity of the gasses is 1720 meters / second and dropped the reference to mach.

> the spaceship is under variable acceleration but constant gravitational pull.

What are the factors for the variation in accleration? You mentioned that a reduction in mass was going to be ignored (although since fuel to total weight for a typical rocket is around 91%, I'm not sure why this is being ignored). Are you taking into account that the pull of gravity will decrease with altitude? Are you taking into account that aerodynamic drag will decrease with altitude (assuming you're planing on landing the rocket on the earth).

> will it be able to approach the ground without crashing therefore when initial conditions are altitude = 100km, velocity = 0.

Well if it works with no atmosphere, it will work with atmosphere. For the no atmoshpere case, it's probably easier to calculate if the rocket could launch, spend all it's fuel, and reach 100km (note the rocket continues upwards after fuel runs out).
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Despite the open ended question you are really limited in the way you can go by a solution. Take into account the air resistance, acceleration due to gravity and the thrust. Then break that into variable and constant mass. I can't do the maths for you though :)
 

1. What is variable acceleration terminal velocity?

Variable acceleration terminal velocity refers to the maximum speed that an object can reach when falling through a fluid (such as air or water) while experiencing changing acceleration due to different forces acting on it.

2. How is variable acceleration terminal velocity calculated?

The calculation of variable acceleration terminal velocity involves taking into account the object's mass, the force of gravity, and the opposing forces (such as air resistance) acting on the object. A mathematical model, such as the drag equation, can be used to calculate the terminal velocity.

3. What factors affect variable acceleration terminal velocity?

The two main factors that affect variable acceleration terminal velocity are the object's mass and the opposing forces acting on it. The shape and size of the object, as well as the properties of the fluid it is falling through, can also have an impact on its terminal velocity.

4. Can an object reach terminal velocity in a vacuum?

No, an object cannot reach terminal velocity in a vacuum because there is no fluid present to create opposing forces. In this scenario, the object will continue to accelerate until it reaches its maximum speed or encounters another force that will slow it down.

5. How does variable acceleration terminal velocity differ from constant acceleration terminal velocity?

Variable acceleration terminal velocity takes into account the changing acceleration of an object due to different forces acting on it, while constant acceleration terminal velocity assumes a constant acceleration due to a single force (such as gravity). In reality, most objects will experience variable acceleration due to multiple forces acting on them, leading to a more complex calculation for terminal velocity.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
282
Replies
4
Views
884
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
980
  • Mechanics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top