New Reply

Momentum conservation - falling object

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun6-12, 09:56 AM   #1
 

Momentum conservation - falling object


If an object falls there are two ways to consider momentum conservation

Way 1:
The system involves just the object therefore the gravitational force is an EXTERNAL force so momentum is NOT conserved

Way 2:
The system involves object and earth. The increase in momentum of the object down = increase in momentum of earth up (therefore momentum is conserved)

Is this correct?
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Promising doped zirconia
>> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease
>> Bringing life into focus
Jun6-12, 09:59 AM   #2
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
Perfectly correct.
 
Jun6-12, 10:06 AM   #3
 
Quote by Doc Al View Post
Perfectly correct.
ok so when we have a falling ball that reaches terminal velocity would I be correct in thinking momentum is NOT conserved because of the EXTERNAL force of air resistance?
 
Jun6-12, 10:16 AM   #4
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1

Momentum conservation - falling object


Quote by jsmith613 View Post
ok so when we have a falling ball that reaches terminal velocity would I be correct in thinking momentum is NOT conserved because of the EXTERNAL force of air resistance?
Not sure what you mean. If something falling has reached terminal velocity, that means the net force on it is zero. It's moving at constant velocity. The momentum's not changing.

There are two external forces acting, which cancel each other: gravity and air resistance.
 
Jun6-12, 10:26 AM   #5
 
Quote by Doc Al View Post
Not sure what you mean. If something falling has reached terminal velocity, that means the net force on it is zero. It's moving at constant velocity. The momentum's not changing.

There are two external forces acting, which cancel each other: gravity and air resistance.
ok then before terminal velocity the momentum is falling because of air resistance...in this case as it APPROACHES terminal velocity, momentum is NOT conserved because of the external force AIR resistance..is that more correct?
 
Jun6-12, 10:29 AM   #6
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
Quote by jsmith613 View Post
ok then before terminal velocity the momentum is falling because of air resistance...in this case as it APPROACHES terminal velocity, momentum is NOT conserved because of the external force AIR resistance..is that more correct?
Momentum is not conserved because there's a net force on the body, even without air resistance. Gravity is an external force also.
 
Jun6-12, 10:58 AM   #7
 
Quote by Doc Al View Post
Momentum is not conserved because there's a net force on the body, even without air resistance. Gravity is an external force also.
but i though we said that from "way 2" gravity is not an external force because we can consider the earth and ball as one system...that;s why momentum is conserved in way 2??
 
Jun6-12, 11:24 AM   #8
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by jsmith613 View Post
but i though we said that from "way 2" gravity is not an external force because we can consider the earth and ball as one system...that;s why momentum is conserved in way 2??
In your case of terminal velocity, there is an external force of the air on the falling object. In the 2nd scenario, there was no air resistance therefore no external force. IF you consider the object, earth (gravity), and air (resistance) as a single system, momentum is conserved as the object is impacting the molecules in the air which push back on the object.
 
Jun6-12, 11:28 AM   #9
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
Quote by jsmith613 View Post
but i though we said that from "way 2" gravity is not an external force because we can consider the earth and ball as one system...that;s why momentum is conserved in way 2??
I didn't realize you were talking about 'way 2'. In any case, why is the air not considered as part of the earth?
 
Jun6-12, 11:29 AM   #10
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Doc Al View Post
I didn't realize you were talking about 'way 2'. In any case, why is the air not considered as part of the earth?
I believe he meant the earth as something that produces gravity. The atmosphere is usually not considered when thinking of gravity.
 
Jun6-12, 11:41 AM   #11
 
Quote by Doc Al View Post
I didn't realize you were talking about 'way 2'. In any case, why is the air not considered as part of the earth?
ok so your saying that using "Way 2" momentum is ALWAYS conserved (regardless of air-resistance / gravity) for falling objects
 
Jun6-12, 11:55 AM   #12
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
Quote by jsmith613 View Post
ok so your saying that using "Way 2" momentum is ALWAYS conserved (regardless of air-resistance / gravity) for falling objects
It depends on what you are consider as your system.

If your system is ball + earth (including air), then there are no external forces and total momentum is conserved.

But if your system is ball + earth (excluding air), then there are external forces and total momentum of that system is not necessarily conserved.
 
Jun6-12, 11:58 AM   #13
 
Quote by Doc Al View Post
It depends on what you are consider as your system.

If your system is ball + earth (including air), then there are no external forces and total momentum is conserved.

But if your system is ball + earth (excluding air), then there are external forces and total momentum of that system is not necessarily conserved.
so I doubt I would be asked a question like this in an exam UNLESS it is clearly stated what is and what is not part of the system...right?

e.g: system is earth and ball ONLY means air is an external force...
 
Jun6-12, 12:11 PM   #14
 
Mentor
Blog Entries: 1
Quote by jsmith613 View Post
so I doubt I would be asked a question like this in an exam UNLESS it is clearly stated what is and what is not part of the system...right?
Right. If they ask whether momentum is conserved they must specify the system they are considering, if there is any possibility of confusion.
 
Jun6-12, 12:16 PM   #15
 
Quote by Doc Al View Post
Right. If they ask whether momentum is conserved they must specify the system they are considering, if there is any possibility of confusion.
thanks alot for you help :)
 
Jun6-12, 03:03 PM   #16
 
If you consider the momentum of the Earth and air and ball together, it will be conserved. If something if falling in air, then it's pushing some parcels of air down with it.
 
Jun6-12, 03:23 PM   #17
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
A concise way to say this is that momentum is always conserved in a closed system, which just means including everything that is exerting forces on each other as part of the same system. It's all how you regard the system, and it should be clear in any question, but often there is value in breaking up the system into parts. When you do that, the concept of conservation of momentum means you are only "moving momentum around" from one part to another, just like with energy conservation (except bear in mind that momentum has a direction and energy doesn't).
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Momentum conservation - falling object
Thread Forum Replies
Conservation of momentum/mass when dropping an object on a spring. Introductory Physics Homework 9
Conservation of angular momentum of a falling particle Introductory Physics Homework 2
Impulse-Momentum Theorem: find the time for a falling object to increase its velocity Introductory Physics Homework 1
Law of the Conservation of Angular Momentum > Principle of Conservation of Momentum General Engineering 0
Conservation of Momentum: Falling object General Physics 11