New Reply

Solving an IVP using Laplace Transforms.

 
Share Thread
Sep3-12, 03:21 AM   #1
 

Solving an IVP using Laplace Transforms.


Ok I'm supposed to Solve this problem using Laplace Transforms.

[tex] \frac{d^2 x}{dt^2}+2\frac{dx}{dt}+x = 5e^{-2t} + t [/tex]

Initial Conditions

x (0) = 2 ; [tex] \frac{dx}{dt} (0) = -3 [/tex]

so I transformed the the IVP and it looks like this

[tex] s^2 x(s) - s x(s) - x (0) + 2 x(s) - x(0) + x(s) = \frac{5}{s+2} + \frac {1}{s^2} [/tex]

Then I plugged in my initial conditions


[tex] s^2 x(s) + 3s - 2 + 2 x(s) - 2 + x(s) = \frac{5}{s+2} + \frac {1}{s^2} [/tex]


Then I factored the x(s) on the left side, and found a common denominator on the right side

[tex] s^2 x(s) + 2 x(s) + x(s) + 3s - 4 = \frac{5}{s+2} + \frac {1}{s^2} [/tex]


[tex] s^2 x(s) + 2 x(s) + x(s) + 3s - 4 = \frac{5}{s+2}*\frac {s^2}{s^2} + \frac {1}{s^2} *\frac {s+2}{s+2} [/tex]

[tex] s^2 x(s) + 2 x(s) + x(s) + 3s - 4 = \frac{5s^2}{(s+2)s^2} + \frac {s+2}{(s^2)(s+2)}[/tex]

[tex] s^2 x(s) + 2 x(s) + x(s) + 3s - 4 = \frac{5s^2 + s + 2}{(s+2)s^2} [/tex]

[tex] (s^2 + 2s + 1) x(s) = \frac{5s^2 + s + 2}{(s+2)s^2} - 3s +4 [/tex]

Then I found x(s)

[tex] (s+1)(s+1) x(s) = \frac{5s^2 + s + 2}{(s+2)s^2} (- 3s +4)*\frac{(s+2)s^2}{(s+2)s^2} [/tex]

[tex](-3s +4)*(s^3 + 2s^2) = -3s^4 - 6s^3 + 4s^3 + 8s^2 [/tex]

[tex] x(s) = \frac{5s^2 + s + 2 -3s^4 - 6s^3 + 4s^3 + 8s^2 }{(s+2)(s^2)(s+1)^2} [/tex]

[tex] x(s) = \frac{13s^2 + s + 2 -3s^4 -2s^3 }{(s+2)(s^2)(s+1)^2} [/tex]

Now I used the heaviside theorem to find the residues.

[tex] x(s) = \frac{13s^2 + s + 2 -3s^4 -2s^3 }{(s+2)(s^2)(s+1)^2} = \frac{R1}{s} + \frac{R2}{s^2} + \frac{R3}{s+2} + \frac{R4}{(s+1)^2} + \frac{R5}{s+1} [/tex]

Ok so here is where I'm stuck. Say I try to solve for R3.

[tex] R3 = (s+2) x(s) |s = -2 , \frac{13s^2 + s + 2 -3s^4 -2s^3 }{(s^2)(s+1)^2} | s = -2 ] = 5 [/tex]

Ok so I got the correct residue for R3, but now I'm stuck what do I do after this?
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> New language discovery reveals linguistic insights
>> US official: Solar plane to help ground energy use (Update)
>> Four microphones, computer algorithm enough to produce 3-D model of simple, convex room
Sep3-12, 05:29 AM   #2
 
Hi !

OK. R3=5
Why not doing the same for the other coefficients ?
multiply by (s+1)² to compute R4
multiply by s² to obtain R2
Sep3-12, 10:07 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Quote by geno678 View Post
Ok I'm supposed to Solve this problem using Laplace Transforms.

[tex] \frac{d^2 x}{dt^2}+2\frac{dx}{dt}+x = 5e^{-2t} + t [/tex]

Initial Conditions

x (0) = 2 ; [tex] \frac{dx}{dt} (0) = -3 [/tex]

so I transformed the the IVP and it looks like this

[tex] s^2 x(s) - s x(s) - x (0) + 2 x(s) - x(0) + x(s) = \frac{5}{s+2} + \frac {1}{s^2} [/tex]
Before you get too deep into your calculation, you might want to double check this result. The Laplace transform of the second derivative is

$$\mathcal L[\ddot{x}(t)](s) = s^2 X(s) - s x(t=0) - \dot{x}(t=0),$$
whereas you seem to have written

$$s^2 X(s) - sX(s) - x(0).$$
(I'm writing ##X(s)## for the transform to make it easier to distinguish from x(t)).

When you transform the first derivative term, it also looks like you didn't factor through the 2 : you wrote ##2X(s)-x(t=0)## instead of ##2X(s) - 2x(t=0)##.
Sep3-12, 02:29 PM   #4
 

Solving an IVP using Laplace Transforms.


Quote by Mute View Post
Before you get too deep into your calculation, you might want to double check this result. The Laplace transform of the second derivative is

$$\mathcal L[\ddot{x}(t)](s) = s^2 X(s) - s x(t=0) - \dot{x}(t=0),$$
whereas you seem to have written

$$s^2 X(s) - sX(s) - x(0).$$
(I'm writing ##X(s)## for the transform to make it easier to distinguish from x(t)).

When you transform the first derivative term, it also looks like you didn't factor through the 2 : you wrote ##2X(s)-x(t=0)## instead of ##2X(s) - 2x(t=0)##.
Oh I see it now that's why I've been messing up. Thanks.
Sep3-12, 02:43 PM   #5
 
Quote by Mute View Post
Before you get too deep into your calculation, you might want to double check this result. The Laplace transform of the second derivative is

$$\mathcal L[\ddot{x}(t)](s) = s^2 X(s) - s x(t=0) - \dot{x}(t=0),$$
whereas you seem to have written

$$s^2 X(s) - sX(s) - x(0).$$
(I'm writing ##X(s)## for the transform to make it easier to distinguish from x(t)).

When you transform the first derivative term, it also looks like you didn't factor through the 2 : you wrote ##2X(s)-x(t=0)## instead of ##2X(s) - 2x(t=0)##.
So it ends up becoming

[tex] s^2 X(s) - s X(0) - \dot{x}(0) [/tex]

Which in turn becomes

[tex] s^2 X(s) - 2s +3 [/tex]
New Reply

Similar discussions for: Solving an IVP using Laplace Transforms.
Thread Forum Replies
Solving circuit using Laplace Transforms Electrical Engineering 5
Help solving differential equation using Laplace Transforms Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Laplace & Inverse Laplace Transforms Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
solving linear eqns using laplace transforms Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Solving Transcendental Equations (and Laplace Transforms) Calculus & Beyond Homework 1