- #1
hen
- 7
- 0
"...if god exist..."
... and in the spirit of all those replies...
... let us vote!...
... and in the spirit of all those replies...
... let us vote!...
In summary, the conversation is discussing the idea of voting on the existence of God and how it is ultimately meaningless as the majority vote does not determine reality. The example of the cosmological constant in theoretical physics is used to illustrate how experts can be influenced by their own biases and limited knowledge. Ultimately, voting on the existence of God or any other aspect of reality is futile.
- #2
gonpost
- 19
- 0
- #3
Les Sleeth
Gold Member
- 2,262
- 2
hen said:
I won't vote because a vote about the nature of reality means absolutely nothing. If everyone agrees God is . . . that doesn't mean God is. Everyone votes science is . . . that doesn't mean science is.
I was watching a special today on how regretably the idea of a cosmological constant was allowed into theoretical physics. If you took a vote when everybody wanted the universe to be static, guess what the answer would have been; take a vote now and you get different results.
Right now we have no idea what we don't know, and so the experts are "convinced" the universe has to be or can't possibly be certain ways. Take a vote and mostly what you get is people's unsupportable opinions and biases.
What is the purpose of "Voting on the Existence of God"?
The purpose of voting on the existence of God is to gather opinions and perspectives from individuals about the concept of a higher being or deity. It is a way to engage in discussions and debates about religion and spirituality.
How does the voting process work for "Voting on the Existence of God"?
The voting process typically involves presenting a statement or question related to the existence of God, and then allowing individuals to vote on their belief or perspective. This can be done through various methods such as online polls, surveys, or in-person discussions.
Is "Voting on the Existence of God" a scientific method?
No, "Voting on the Existence of God" is not a scientific method. It does not follow the principles of the scientific method, which involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data. Instead, voting on this topic is a way for people to express their beliefs and opinions.
What does the outcome of "Voting on the Existence of God" mean?
The outcome of voting on the existence of God does not necessarily have a definitive meaning or answer. It is simply a way to gauge the opinions and beliefs of individuals on the topic. The results can vary greatly and are not meant to prove or disprove the existence of a higher being.
Is "Voting on the Existence of God" a valid scientific study?
No, "Voting on the Existence of God" is not considered a valid scientific study. It lacks the necessary components and methodology to be considered a scientific study. It is purely a way for individuals to express their thoughts and beliefs on the topic of the existence of God.
Similar threads
-
Feedback and Announcements
-
General Discussion
-
General Discussion
-
General Discussion