All but bankrupt Greece and oil

  • News
  • Thread starter Andre
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Oil
In summary, it has been discussed before that Greece is a financial liability for the EU and that it was puzzling that most European leaders continued to believe in a happy end. However, they probably knew this and were preparing for the possibility that Greece would have to leave the Euro zone. The differences in cultures and financial systems appear too big for the EU to work well, and so leaving may be the best option.
  • #1
Andre
4,311
74
It has been discussed before that Greece is a financial liability for the EU and that it was puzzling that most European leaders continued to believe in a happy end.

But they probably knew this

Greece receives 8 bids for oil, gas exploration...

..The three blocks combined, two off-shore and one onshore, may contain as much as 280 million barrels of oil, Greek officials said last year

I wonder why this has taken so long and if the stock markets will soar next week.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Olive oil?

:tongue2:
 
  • #3
Andre said:
... it was puzzling that most European leaders continued to believe in a happy end ...

No, I don't think they believed in a happy end so much as they believed in the LEAST UNHAPPY end, which is for Greece to stay in the Euro zone.
 
  • #4
phinds said:
No, I don't think they believed in a happy end so much as they believed in the LEAST UNHAPPY end, which is for Greece to stay in the Euro zone.

That could be true, however it would have been an easier decision with this knowledge. Discussions however are ongoing if the EU was a really good idea, beyond a certain level of co-operation. The differences in cultures and financial systems appear too big for that.


lisab said:
Olive oil?

:tongue2:

Ah, that could explain the gas too? :uhh:
 
  • #5
Andre said:
That could be true, however it would have been an easier decision with this knowledge. Discussions however are ongoing if the EU was a really good idea, beyond a certain level of co-operation. The differences in cultures and financial systems appear too big for that.

Yeah, there are plenty of serious and well-known economists that say exactly that and that without further political union AND a more serious financial union, it really ISN'T a workable "union".

There are several, apparently, that predicted that the monetary union would face disaster as soon as it was presented with any real troubles, exactly because of the point you make about the cultural and financial differences among the participants.

I just read an interesting article yesterday about how the German reunification left a very bitter taste with West Germans, who spent a fantastic amount of money to make the reunification work, and who are therefor now very adverse to giving huge amounts of money to poor countries such as Greece.

And yes, I certainly agree w/ you that knowledge of the possible oil revenues makes the whole situation much more hopeful.
 
  • #6
The monetary union has turned into a debt racket. At this point, for Greece, and perhaps soon for Portugal and Spain, leaving the euro may have too unpredictable an outcome, and so staying within the union becomes the best option.

Fear of the unknown is being used against these nation, turning them into protectorates of the Franco-German debt machine. Fear cannot become a motivator of the various individual goernments, but I am afraid it has begun. Some hard-core socialist factions within the EU parliament want to ignore the elected governments of the various heavily indebted nations. They see the overthrow of the sovereign nation as the price they must pay (sacrifice) for being bailed out.
 
  • #7
Andre said:
It has been discussed before that Greece is a financial liability for the EU and that it was puzzling that most European leaders continued to believe in a happy end.

But they probably knew this



I wonder why this has taken so long and if the stock markets will soar next week.

So ..., enough oil to supply their ( Greece's) need for 2 years - not really that wondrous.
 
  • #8
I think everyone knew that problems would occur at some point, because as has been pointed out, there are large differences between the countries.

However, I do believe that in the long run, EU/EMU is absolutely necessary, because there are just certain problems that can only be solved globally (or at least on as large scale as possible), for example environmental issues. Money does go from the richer countries in europe to the poorer, but they come with demands, and this is what makes EU so important. It's allowing EU to enforce countries to manage their finances, follow environmental treaties and reduce corruption. In the long run, I'm convinced the net effects are positive (and indeed necessary for the EU region to work well).

West vs east germany was mentioned as an example, and sure, some west germans do feel disgruntled that they have to pay, but if you look at the cities in east germany and how much they have improved because of this money, you'll realize it's a clear net positive effect. 50 years ahead in the future when the west has already stopped giving money since long, no one will be bothered by the fact that they once did, and east will be just as wealthy as the west ( and contributing on its own). In the end, the long term effects are much more important than the short term ones.
 
  • #9
Andre said:
It has been discussed before that Greece is a financial liability for the EU and that it was puzzling that most European leaders continued to believe in a happy end.

But they probably knew this



I wonder why this has taken so long and if the stock markets will soar next week.

While domestic production is good thing, the report of 280 million barrels is not much oil. That's ~two weeks of US consumption and a total of $2.8B @ $100/bbl over the period of production, say $280M/year. By comparison the article states Greece spends up to $16B on oil imports currently. So not much soaring expected.
 
  • #10
phinds said:
Yeah, there are plenty of serious and well-known economists that say exactly that and that without further political union AND a more serious financial union, it really ISN'T a workable "union".

There are several, apparently, that predicted that the monetary union would face disaster as soon as it was presented with any real troubles, exactly because of the point you make about the cultural and financial differences among the participants.

...

I read that the euro zone could work if, and only if, countries in trouble like Greece simply go ahead and default. The hurdle is that larger euro countries don't want to suffer the consequence, which is that some of their banks holding large chunks of troubled foreign debt would fail (ala the US's MF Global that held European debt).
 
  • #11
mheslep said:
I read that the euro zone could work if, and only if, countries in trouble like Greece simply go ahead and default. The hurdle is that larger euro countries don't want to suffer the consequence, which is that some of their banks holding large chunks of troubled foreign debt would fail (ala the US's MF Global that held European debt).

I honestly don't see anyway that it can work out. How can businesses in Greece ever hope to be competitive with those in Germany when sharing the same currency? Germany now has lower taxes and better infrastructure.

Even if Greece some how manages to get their debt under control, I doubt they will ever be able to compete with Germany.
 
  • #12
JonDE said:
I honestly don't see anyway that it can work out. How can businesses in Greece ever hope to be competitive with those in Germany when sharing the same currency? Germany now has lower taxes and better infrastructure.

Even if Greece some how manages to get their debt under control, I doubt they will ever be able to compete with Germany.
They can compete like anyone else by having a lower cost of labor and doing business, in part by having *lower* taxes. Cuts in government spending enable lower taxes. Greek taxes are a consequence of Greek choices in their fiscal arena - run away government jobs and benefits, retirement at age 50 to the islands and the like.

The threat from behaving as Greece has done was understood at the onset the Euro zone. At that time agreements were signed mandating no government would run deficits higher than a certain level, because the prior solution of devaluing sovereign currency to correct for runaway spending and noncompetitive labor policies was going away.

But of course those agreements were bound to be violated as there's no enforcement (before the fact). What's lacking now is hard look at enforcement after the fact. There are three, possibly four options: i) end the Euro zone (a disaster), ii) inflate away the debt, iii) sovereign default, iv) growth via liberalization of labor laws and regulation. If Greece fails to do iv), then I see iii) as the only long term solution. I can not see Germany allowing another giant inflation.
 
Last edited:

1. What caused Greece to become almost bankrupt?

Greece's financial troubles began in 2009, when the global economic crisis caused a sharp decline in its economy. The country was also heavily reliant on borrowing and had high levels of government debt, which made it vulnerable to economic shocks. Additionally, Greece had a history of corruption and mismanagement in its public sector, further exacerbating its financial problems.

2. How did Greece's financial crisis affect its oil industry?

Greece's financial crisis had a significant impact on its oil industry. As the country's economy struggled, there was a decrease in demand for oil and a decrease in investment in the industry. This led to a decline in production and revenue for oil companies operating in Greece. The crisis also caused the country to prioritize paying off its debt over investing in its oil infrastructure, further hindering the industry's growth.

3. How has Greece attempted to address its financial troubles?

Since the start of its financial crisis, Greece has implemented various austerity measures, including cutting government spending, raising taxes, and reducing public sector wages. The country has also received multiple bailout packages from international organizations, such as the European Union and the International Monetary Fund. However, these measures have been met with public protests and have not been enough to fully resolve Greece's financial problems.

4. What is the current state of Greece's economy and oil industry?

As of 2021, Greece's economy has shown signs of improvement, with a growth rate of 3.2% in 2019 and a projected growth rate of 5.3% in 2021. However, the country's debt levels still remain high, and its economic recovery has been slower compared to other European countries. The oil industry in Greece has also not fully recovered, with production levels still below pre-crisis levels and ongoing challenges in attracting investment.

5. How does Greece's financial situation impact the global economy?

Greece's financial crisis has had a ripple effect on the global economy. As a member of the European Union and the Eurozone, the country's struggles have had implications for the stability of the euro and the European economy as a whole. The crisis also highlighted the interconnectedness of the global economy and the potential consequences of a country's financial troubles on the rest of the world.

Similar threads

Replies
51
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
Back
Top