Is the US National Debt Reaching a Dangerous Tipping Point?

  • News
  • Thread starter Oltz
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Debt
In summary, the conversation is discussing the issue of the National Debt surpassing the GDP and the potential consequences. Some believe that a balanced budget amendment and decrease in spending is necessary to prevent further debt, while others argue that the debt=GDP threshold is not a real danger area and that taxes alone cannot solve the problem. The conversation also touches on the difficulty of addressing entitlement spending and the potential resistance to reducing benefits. It is suggested that raising taxes to match expenditures could solve the issue, but others argue that this may not be feasible.
  • #106
MarcoD said:
I reasoned the US debt is 70% GDP, so I think everybody can stop worrying.

The US position is -I think- completely comparable to someone who has $70 debt, and knows that he will spend $30 in the future. Since he knows that, he writes an IOU of $30, and gives himself $30. His total debt now is $100, but he owns $30. All interest on the debt of $30, he just pays to himself.
Oh, ok - so we could just decide to simplify the balance sheet by taking that $70+$30-$30=$70. I'm sure all the bondholders won't have a problem with that. :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
Nah, I am an idiot, it seems. Miscalculation. :redface:
 
  • #108
Lets put this into perspective.

U.S. debt is 100%~ its GDP.

Japan's is 200% of its GDP.
 
  • #109
jduster said:
Lets put this into perspective.

U.S. debt is 100%~ its GDP.

Japan's is 200% of its GDP.
And what were the consequences of that debt, which they began acquiring in the '90's?
http://www.google.com/publicdata/ex...untry&tstart=-312318000000&tend=1265605200000

http://www.google.com/publicdata/ex...t=318834000000&tend=1265605200000&hl=en&dl=en

I'd like for the US to avoid 'lost decades' if it can.

Also, Japan has severely curtailed its deficit spending relative to the US:
http://www.google.com/publicdata/ex..._group&tstart=729147600000&tend=1202446800000

As of 2008 nobody except Greece was going in the hole faster than the US, including the other troubled EU countries like Spain, Italy, and the UK.
http://www.google.com/publicdata/ex...group&tstart=1013144400000&tend=1202446800000
 
Last edited:
  • #110
mheslep said:
As of 2008 nobody except Greece was going in the hole faster than the US, including the other troubled EU countries like Spain, Italy, and the UK.

Interesting the chart ends in 2008... When I see stuff like that my gut reaction is that we're all going down the drain. I know we ended up with a deficit due to the housing collapse, not sure what happened afterwards.
 
  • #111
MarcoD said:
Interesting the chart ends in 2008... When I see stuff like that my gut reaction is that we're all going down the drain. I know we ended up with a deficit due to the housing collapse, not sure what happened afterwards.
Clearly all are not going down the drain. Germany is not. Norway is not. Switzerland is not. Even one of the original PIGS, Ireland, has turned its spending around and is recovering.
 
  • #113
MarcoD said:
The odd thing is that despite the growing public debt, the interest on public debt remains really low -probably that low that value is being destroyed,- for which I have no explanation except for that the money doesn't have anywhere else to go.

Is there anyone who really understands that phenomenon? I have an hypothesis that with the housing bubble that much money was created that, after it deflated, all that money has to move from private to public debt or otherwise the financial system blows up. But that hypothesis may well be horsedung.

The interest payments are low because the interest rates are being held low by the fed.

Of course this results in devaluation of the dollar and eventual inflation.

It's the deliberate but unstated policy of the federal reserve to inflate the currency since it transfers wealth from bondholders. You borrow a dollar of value today from the Chinese government but pay them back with an inflated dollar and a tiny interest rate in the future. It's actually a net transfer of wealth from the lender.

This policy counteracts the imbalance of trade resulting from the Chinese pegging the Yuan to the dollar and enables massive deficits to take place (a higher interest rate would require the borrowing of smaller amounts.)
 
  • #114
Antiphon said:
The interest payments are low because the interest rates are being held low by the fed.

I am not sure. Greenspan stated that when he was at the Fed they tried to fight lowering interest but failed. He didn't understand that.

Low interest rates inflate bubbles, like the housing bubble. I am not sure Bernanke is that happy with it because now he has two choices: let the rates rise, in which case the debt becomes unsustainable, or keep the rates low, in which case the debt levels are sustainable but other bubbles may be created.

Maybe there's just less he can do about it than most people think.

The balance sheet of the Fed looked pretty okay to me, though.

Antiphon said:
Of course this results in devaluation of the dollar and eventual inflation.

Yah, I think so too.

Antiphon said:
It's the deliberate but unstated policy of the federal reserve to inflate the currency since it transfers wealth from bondholders. You borrow a dollar of value today from the Chinese government but pay them back with an inflated dollar and a tiny interest rate in the future. It's actually a net transfer of wealth from the lender.

In short: the Chinese produced, got currency, and now hold bonds which decrease in worth. I see that.

Antiphon said:
This policy counteracts the imbalance of trade resulting from the Chinese pegging the Yuan to the dollar and enables massive deficits to take place (a higher interest rate would require the borrowing of smaller amounts.)

I know it's an unpopular view, but I personally agree with the Chinese. What's more fair than pegging a currency? If the currencies are interchangeable, you actually buy -and get back- a true amount of goods for a certain amount. If the US doesn't want a trade deficit, it should buy less, or produce more, against the counter party.
 
  • #115
A balanced budget each year isn't necessary, as debt is all relative. As long as the economy is growing faster than the debt, than it is okay.
 
  • #116
MarcoD said:
I know it's an unpopular view, but I personally agree with the Chinese. What's more fair than pegging a currency? If the currencies are interchangeable, you actually buy -and get back- a true amount of goods for a certain amount. If the US doesn't want a trade deficit, it should buy less, or produce more, against the counter party.

I forgot to say that it works two ways too, IMO. If China wants to sit on a dwindling pile of cash instead of buying US goods, yeah, whatever.
 
  • #117
jduster said:
A balanced budget each year isn't necessary, as debt is all relative. As long as the economy is growing faster than the debt, than it is okay.
Not really. The greater the debt to economic output ratio, the more sensitive the system becomes to shocks. Lenders to governments know this, know that even robust economies growing faster than the debt will sooner or later have a downturn in which the debt continues to grow while the economy does not. When the interest payments on the debt grow large enough that they could possibly consume all revenue in a downturn, as they did in Greece, then lenders have good reason to suspect they won't be paid, they demand higher interest rates quickly making the suspicion a reality.
 
Last edited:
  • #118
Most people in Europe will have the gut reaction, well I do, that if you run a trade deficit and a large public debt/deficit, that the economy will tank at some point. I've no idea what people think about the US at the moment, but I know there has been some speculation that the US is destroying the dollar intentionally.

But then again, Ireland has had a 100% GDP debt sometimes and worked back from that. I really wouldn't know.
 
  • #119
MarcoD said:
...

But then again, Ireland has had a 100% GDP debt sometimes and worked back from that.
Yes they did, by cutting by spending. Ireland's interest rates have dropped dramatically since mid-summer last year.
http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/GIGB10YR:IND
 
  • #120
mheslep said:
Not really. The greater the debt to economic output ratio, the more sensitive the system becomes to shocks. Lenders to governments know this, know that even robust economies growing faster than the debt will sooner or later have a downturn in which the debt continues to grow while the economy does not. When the interest payments on the debt grow large enough that they could possibly consume all revenue in a downturn, as they did in Greece, then lenders have good reason to suspect they won't be paid, they demand higher interest rates quickly making the suspicion a reality.

Great point, IMO. I see empirical evidence everywhere around me. When the economy is booming some raise their credit to the level that overtime is needed, just to live. All is good until a downturn and overtime disappears, then they have no chance of making ends meet. Government budgets do run like individual budgets, the same budget problems that affect citizens affect government, it can be a benefit to take on credit, in the short term, since one can build, but when those choices are based on faulty beliefs like it is a benefit to furure generations therefore we can spend more than one, two or even three generations can pay back. Sooner or later the problems will come to the surface, and we all go down with the ship, even if we live our lives completely on the other end of the scale. Which if government is about fairness and equality, like progressives expouse, it seems to me counter-intuitive, or even illogical.
 
  • #121
Don't mean to head off topic too much but I found this infographic - U.S debt in pennies. Absolutely mind blowing...

Click here for the infographic
 
<h2>1. What is the current level of US national debt?</h2><p>The current level of US national debt is over $28 trillion, which is approximately 130% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP).</p><h2>2. What is considered a dangerous tipping point for national debt?</h2><p>A dangerous tipping point for national debt is typically considered to be when it reaches 90% of the country's GDP. At this level, it becomes increasingly difficult for the government to pay off its debt and can lead to economic instability.</p><h2>3. How does the US national debt impact the economy?</h2><p>The US national debt can have both positive and negative impacts on the economy. On one hand, it allows the government to fund important programs and stimulate economic growth. However, if the debt becomes too high, it can lead to higher interest rates, inflation, and a decrease in consumer and investor confidence.</p><h2>4. What factors contribute to the increase in US national debt?</h2><p>There are several factors that contribute to the increase in US national debt, including government spending on social programs, defense, and interest on previous debt. Additionally, economic downturns and tax cuts can also contribute to an increase in national debt.</p><h2>5. How can the US government address the issue of rising national debt?</h2><p>The US government can address the issue of rising national debt by implementing fiscal policies such as raising taxes, reducing government spending, and implementing measures to boost economic growth. Additionally, the government can also consider restructuring its debt or negotiating with creditors to lower interest rates.</p>

1. What is the current level of US national debt?

The current level of US national debt is over $28 trillion, which is approximately 130% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP).

2. What is considered a dangerous tipping point for national debt?

A dangerous tipping point for national debt is typically considered to be when it reaches 90% of the country's GDP. At this level, it becomes increasingly difficult for the government to pay off its debt and can lead to economic instability.

3. How does the US national debt impact the economy?

The US national debt can have both positive and negative impacts on the economy. On one hand, it allows the government to fund important programs and stimulate economic growth. However, if the debt becomes too high, it can lead to higher interest rates, inflation, and a decrease in consumer and investor confidence.

4. What factors contribute to the increase in US national debt?

There are several factors that contribute to the increase in US national debt, including government spending on social programs, defense, and interest on previous debt. Additionally, economic downturns and tax cuts can also contribute to an increase in national debt.

5. How can the US government address the issue of rising national debt?

The US government can address the issue of rising national debt by implementing fiscal policies such as raising taxes, reducing government spending, and implementing measures to boost economic growth. Additionally, the government can also consider restructuring its debt or negotiating with creditors to lower interest rates.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
4
Replies
119
Views
14K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
Replies
73
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
87
Views
12K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
11K
Back
Top