Revolutionizing Cancer Treatment: Harnessing the Power of Dendritic Cells

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of dendritic cells in cancer treatment, specifically how these immune cells can be manipulated to target the p53 protein, which is involved in tumor suppression. Participants explore the implications of this approach, its mechanisms, and potential risks, including concerns about the specificity of the immune response and the broader consequences of targeting a protein present in normal cells.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that dendritic cells are isolated from cancer patients and exposed to a mixture of inactivated cold virus and p53 to train the immune system to attack cells expressing p53.
  • Concerns are raised about p53 being a tumor suppressor and its presence in normal cells, leading to questions about the safety of training the immune system to attack it.
  • One participant speculates that the immune response might not be specific to the activated form of p53, raising doubts about whether the treatment could inadvertently target healthy cells.
  • Another participant mentions a different gene therapy method targeting p53, highlighting issues with the immunogenicity of the adenovirus used and the transient expression of the gene.
  • There is a discussion about the feasibility of using this approach as a biological weapon, with differing views on its practicality and effectiveness compared to conventional methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and disagreement regarding the implications of targeting p53, the specificity of the immune response, and the potential risks associated with the treatment. No consensus is reached on these issues.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of p53's role in cancer and normal cells, as well as the challenges in ensuring that the immune response is selective. There are unresolved questions about the mechanisms of action and the safety of the proposed treatments.

wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,104730,00.html

The video is more informative than the article.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
[?] I don't get it.

In short: researchers isolate dendritic cells (the master immune cells) from a cancer patients' blood. They expose these immune cells to a mixture of inactivated cold virus and p53. These immune cells then learn that p53 belongs to a pathogen and should be attacked when encountered.

These activated cells are then injected back in the patient, and the own immune system will attack any cell expressing p53.

Now: what I don't get: p53 is the good guy!

p53 is a tumor surpressor gene, a transcription factor that causes a cell to arrest its cell cycle in G1 or 2 or to perform apoptosis.

The trigger for p53 expression is dna damage or oncogene activation (among other things) and p53 is always present in low amounts in cells in an inactive form, ready to become activated in the case something goes wrong.

I would expect for p53 expression to be high in cancer cells (the protein probably has mutations so that it doesn't work properly) but it is also present in normal cells.

I DID hear that it only works in few cancers, apparently only in the ones where p53 cannot be activated by the cell due to mutations? That would explain, since the good guy in that case wouldn't be a good guy anymore if it has lost its function..
 
So, aside from fighting the cancer, it'll fight all your cells in general?
Sounds like a good biological weapon, train your immune system to attack a substance in every cell in your body...
 
Well, the thing is that it normally is present in low concentrations and it is inactive, in the cancerous cell the molecule would be active and thus have a different conformation. I am not sure if the immune cell is only specific to the activated form, and whether a mutant p53 can become activated at all..

The concentrations might be higher too in a cancerous cell, and probably in such a cancerous cell the p53 is directed towards the plasma membrane, where it gets exposed to the outside so that the immune cell is able to recognize it. A normal cell probably has no p53 exposed to the outside of its membrane.

As I said, I don't get it :P

How do you envision it being applied as a biological weapon? I really don't think that is feasible in this manner :) there are much easier ways to attack every cell in someones body by using conventional methods like microorganisms or toxins, nothing new under the sun.
 
There is a different method based on gene therapy that targets the same gene, in development by Chinese researchers !

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994420

The treatment consists of an adenovirus designed to insert a gene called p53. This gene codes for a protein that triggers cell suicide when cells start to run amok, preventing them becoming cancerous.

Many tumours arise after the mutation or inactivation of p53, and in cancers of this type restoring the protein should kill the tumour cells. This approach has already been tried in the US, with mixed results.
The problem is that they use an adenovirus, which is immunogenic: patients' immune respons can react very fiercely when a wrong dose is given for instance. The other problem with this virus is that the expression of the gene is only transient.
 
Originally posted by Monique

How do you envision it being applied as a biological weapon? I really don't think that is feasible in this manner :) there are much easier ways to attack every cell in someones body by using conventional methods like microorganisms or toxins, nothing new under the sun.
You're right, plenty of efficient biological warfare means to kill people. I just envisioned training a dendritic cell to attack something which is found everywhere, or maybe just in your brain or liver or something. Then, making a virus which will cause your dendritic cells to act that way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K