Determining stable orbits for other stars

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Stable Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions for planetary formation and the stability of orbits around the star Vega. Participants explore the implications of Vega's mass, diameter, and density on the potential for stable planetary orbits, particularly in comparison to the Sun and its planets.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Exploratory, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assertion that Vega's mass, diameter, and density prevent the formation of planets close to the star, arguing that the physics of planet formation is not fully understood.
  • Another participant suggests that the Roche Limit may be relevant, indicating that smaller bodies could be disrupted if they orbit too close to a massive star.
  • A different participant proposes to calculate the Roche Limit for Vega, estimating it based on assumptions about Vega's density and the density of protoplanets, suggesting a Roche Limit of around 3 million kilometers.
  • One participant emphasizes that Vega's density is not necessary for Roche Limit calculations, suggesting that only its mass is needed along with the density of protoplanets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of Vega's characteristics for planetary formation and stable orbits. There is no consensus on the validity of the claims regarding the Roche Limit or the necessity of Vega's density in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on assumptions about Vega's density and the densities of protoplanets, which remain unspecified. The discussion includes speculative estimates and calculations that may not be definitive.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in astrophysics, planetary formation, and orbital mechanics may find this discussion relevant.

aau
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Howdy,
first post, good to be here. I'm sure it will be a learning experience.

My question concerns planetary formation and planet orbits for other stars, specifically the star Vega. I'm having a "disagreement" with someone who claims that Vega's mass, diameter, and density prevents the formation of planets close to the star. I'm having trouble getting this person to define "close", nevertheless I maintain we don't know nearly enough about the physics of planet formation to know this for sure. He also says replace the sun with Vega and Mercury and Venus would not have stable orbits. When I asked the reason he cited the universal law of gravitation and calculated the force of Vega's gravity at Mercury's distance. I find this unconvincing. He also stated force of gravity depends on diameter and density as well as mass, which I dispute. So can anyone clue me in as to what I'm missing here? Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Maybe your friend is talking about the Roche Limit ? If a smaller body orbits too close to a massive body it will suffer tidal stresses and be broken up?
 
I could calculate the Roche Limit for Vega if I knew its density and the density of protoplanets in the circumstellar disk. I'm sure the density of Vega is less than the sun's density of 1.41, and I suspect the density of condensed material close to the star must be similar to iron or rocky asteroids, so around 3-5. Plugging in some guesstimates i get a Roche Limit of around 3 million kilometers, pretty close to the star. This would seem to strengthen my case. I suspect this distance is actually too close to the star's feeding zone, however, so no planet could form as it would be starved for material. Still this is a start. Thanks.
 
You really don't need to know Vega's density, only it's mass and use the formula:

[tex] R_{Roche}= 1.52 \sqrt[3]{\frac{M}{\rho}}[/tex]

Where

[tex]M[/tex] is the mass of Vega
and

[tex]\rho[/tex] is the density of the protoplanet.
 
Welcome to Physics Forums, aau!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K