Can Multiple Time Dimensions Exist in String Theory?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the possibility of multiple time dimensions within the framework of string theory, exploring concepts of time travel, dimensionality, and the nature of time itself. Participants examine theoretical implications and personal interpretations related to these ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant raises the question of whether multiple time dimensions could exist, suggesting that this idea has been mentioned in string theory and seeks references for further exploration.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the feasibility of time travel, asserting that time always moves forward and cannot be warped like space.
  • A different participant presents a conceptual analogy involving shadows and the fourth dimension, proposing that if time were a dimension, it might interact with light in a way that creates three-dimensional effects.
  • One participant challenges the need for mathematical backing for speculative ideas, sharing a personal anecdote about a similar concept they thought of while under the influence of substances, emphasizing the importance of equations in theoretical discussions.
  • Another participant critiques the notion of shadows as two-dimensional objects, arguing that they are better understood as three-dimensional areas of light absence and clarifies their interpretation of time as a dimension through which objects move rather than a moving entity itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the exploration of multiple time dimensions and others contesting the idea of time travel and the nature of time itself. No consensus is reached on these topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the speculative nature of their discussions, with some ideas lacking mathematical support or clear definitions, which may limit their validity in a formal context.

alexsok
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
I just thought about it yesterday, and although is has been discussed here earlier, i'd like to raise the issue again.

Can there really be more than one time dimension? so for instance, we could "circle around", come back, and pass through a moment we have already been through... it's quiet difficult for me to visualise the idea in practice, but it was mentioned that some forms of string theory incorporate just that... i wasn't able to find similar string solutions, so i could use some reference :)

Also, is is possible that there is one time dimension for every space dimension?

Oh, and one more thing :) as I've heard, there has been some progress (again, in String theory), whereby strings have gone through an ordeal in finite energies... does anyone know any articles, or papers, pointing to the decay of the vibrations?

Thanks guys!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Time travel, like the majority of what is talked about here, is highly hypothetical. I believe that though space can warp around and the such, time cannot. Time will always move forward, though how fast one moves forward depends on gravity, and the space-time flux, etc. But all in all, I do not believe that time travel is possible.
 
I thought about something very interesting the other day regarding the 4th dimension.
In our 3D world, a regularly seen 2D object is the shadow. What makes a shadow? As light travels through time and space, it is bound to bend as it hits a surface such as the human body, thereby creating a shadow on another nearby surface. If the 4th dimension were in fact a result of time, would "shadows" in this dimension be three dimensional?
If you think about it, time would act similarly to how light acts in the 3rd dimension. Theoretically, the faster an object moves, the slower time moves (twin theory). As time travels through space it is bound to come into contact with things. The fastest moving "thing" we know of is light. Therefore, as time travels through light, it slows down because light is traveling at such a high speed. This would cause 4th dimensional time to bend around the light so that it creates a 3D object.
I know this idea is quite farfetched, but it is intriguing nonetheless.
Any thoughts?
 
It's intruiging i'll admit but there would have to be equations to back it up. without that as has been said before its simply all conjecture.

When i was tripping on acid i thought of the same exact concept that was in the elegant universe series about 2 dimensions coliding and that that was the cause of the big bang, but i don't exactly have a mathematics degree or physics degree to back up my imagination with anything so unfortunately it goes to waste and that's something i'll just have to deal with till i get atleast 12 yrs of schooling behind my belt.

MythioS
 
In our 3D world, a regularly seen 2D object is the shadow
Shadows are not really a 2-d object, just the absence of lightover an area, a 3d area even though you can only notice the absense when it reflects off a surface. Also (correct me if I missunderstand you) I think your saying that time moves. I think it is most often believed that objects move through time, and time doesn't move itself. The 4th dimension is time, not born of the motion of time...

Despite this, however, your idea is interesting. I to have thought the third dimension as a result of the 4th dimension, like a 3d shadow of a 4d world.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K