| Thread Closed |
Centrifugal pressure |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jan10-06, 06:53 PM | #1 |
|
|
Centrifugal pressure
(see also attached .doc)
There is an ideal gas in the centrifuge; no flows, everything is steady (not very steady in fact - process is adiabatic). If gas is incompressible, it is very easy: P=0.5 rho (w*r)^2 But my gas is compressible, and it's a trouble. I started from distribution law of Bolzman (with C = Bolzman constant): n=n0 exp(mgx/CT) ,hence d(ln n)=(M * w^2 * r) dr / RT ,where M is molar mass of gas after integrating this equation (also used PV/T=const and PV^k=const) I got: P/P0 = { 1 + (k-1)*Mv^2/(2*R*T0) } ^ [k/(k-1)] ,where k=Cp/Cv v=w*r And now goes the trouble. At low velocities (and low compression ratios) the last equation must transform into the first: deltaP=0.5 rho v^2 / 2 But it doesn't! Using the rule (1+x)^a = 1+a*x ,when x<<1 we have: P/P0 = 1 + k*Mv^2 / 2RT0 deltaP/P0 = k*Mv^2 / 2RT0 deltaP = k*rho*v^2 / 2 ,which is k time larger... So what is wrong? Or anybody have a ready-for-use formula? |
| Dec21-06, 07:59 AM | #2 |
|
|
FWIW i don't see what Boltzmann's dist has to do with it, can't you just integrate the ideal gas law with an acceleration correction? i think it makes a lot of difference if the centrifuge is open or closed at the top, having the constraint of fixed total mass will probably change the form of the solution. |
| Dec21-06, 04:04 PM | #3 |
Recognitions:
|
If this is a steady state situation, isn't the temperature constant? Sure there is a transient adiabatic temp change when the centrifuge starts up, but conduction in the gas will get rid of that in the steady state.
So I think you have an ideal gas, with pressure and density varying with radius, and a force dm.r.omega^2 = rho.A.dr.r.omega^2 on the gas between radius r and r+dr. |
| Dec21-06, 06:21 PM | #4 |
|
|
Centrifugal pressure
i think you must have meant to substitute the ideal gas law where one on the centrifugal forces is, as you have it the r.omega^2's just cancel out.
another way to say it, the difference in pressure difference across the layer must be caused by the force on the layer (area cancels, i think) so: dP=w.w.r.dm=w.w.r.dr.P/RT integrate over range , P;Po to P and r;0 to r, so P/Po=K.Exp(w.w.r.r/2RT) and with w=0, P=Po so K=1 so P/Po = Exp(w.w.r.r/2RT) does this seem OK? |
| Dec22-06, 05:03 AM | #5 |
Recognitions:
|
I was just writng the mass in 2 different ways - sorry if that was confusing.
To be pedantic A.dP = w.w.r.dm (what you wrote says "pressure = force" which isn't right) and using dm = rho.dV = rho.A.dr the area cancels out and dP = w.w.r.dr.P/RT |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Centrifugal pressure
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| When did centrifugal force die? | Classical Physics | 12 | ||
| What is Centrifugal force? | General Physics | 64 | ||
| What is a centrifugal force? | General Physics | 5 | ||
| Centrifugal Force | Introductory Physics Homework | 8 | ||
| Centrifugal force in high pressure vessel | Introductory Physics Homework | 7 | ||