Multiplication and division in physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the meaning and significance of multiplying physical quantities, specifically in the context of electrical potential energy. Participants explore the implications of the product of charges in the equation for electrical potential energy and seek to understand the physical significance of this multiplication.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the physical significance of multiplying two charges, suggesting that while the multiplication is straightforward mathematically, its physical meaning may not be clear.
  • One participant proposes that the energy between two charges depends on both charges, likening their product to a 'mixture' of the two charges.
  • Another participant points out that the product of two charges has units of "charge squared," which lacks physical significance on its own, but contributes to the overall energy calculation when combined with other constants.
  • A participant provides axioms regarding electric potential energy, asserting that it must depend on both charges and is independent of their labeling, leading to the conclusion that the potential energy can be expressed as a product of the charges multiplied by a constant.
  • There are inquiries about the definition of electrical potential energy and its practical implications, with one participant expressing a desire for a deeper understanding of the concept.
  • Another participant relates potential energy to biological terms, suggesting a similarity between stored energy in physical systems and energy stored for later use in biological contexts.
  • One post appears to be unclear and lacks coherence, making it difficult to extract a specific claim or viewpoint.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations of the multiplication of charges and its significance, with no clear consensus on the physical meaning of the product of charges. Some agree on the axioms related to electric potential energy, while others remain uncertain about the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding of potential energy and its definitions, indicating that further clarification may be necessary. The discussion includes varying levels of familiarity with the topic, which may affect the depth of the arguments presented.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring the conceptual foundations of electrical potential energy, as well as individuals seeking to understand the relationships between physical quantities in electrostatics.

PiRsq
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
What does it mean to multiply two physical quantities?

Ie: For electrical potential energy the equation is

Ee=kq1q2/r

Where k=Coulombs constant, q1 and q2 are charges in Couloumbs and r is the distance between the charges

What does it mean to multiply q1 and q2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does it mean to multiply q1 and q2?

Uh, since they are numbers, it means just regular multiplication of numbers!

If you mean "what is the physical significance of their product" (not quite what you asked), I don't know that there is any physical significance to it because I don't believe there is any physical quantity that is just that product.

The physical significance of the entire quantity, Ee=kq1q2/r, is precisely given by the definition of "electrical potential energy". You might be able to determine the physical significance by a "dimensional analysis" of the formula but you would really be asking "what is the physical significance of k".
 
What I meant was what is the physical significance of their product? Sometimes I think of it as if the energy between any two charges depend on both charges. Thus the energy in between the two charges is a 'mixture' of both charges...Is that analogy wrong?
 
Originally posted by PiRsq
What I meant was what is the physical significance of their product? Sometimes I think of it as if the energy between any two charges depend on both charges. Thus the energy in between the two charges is a 'mixture' of both charges...Is that analogy wrong?
Well, the product of two charges has units of "charge squared," which is not a unit with any physical significance. You're not going to walk around the lab and find a metal sphere with squared charge on it.

As Halls said, the units of k are such that the squared charge cancels, and the final answer that pops out of your equation has units of energy. By itself, however, a quantity with units of charge squared does not have any physical meaning.

- Warren
 
I'm new to all of this; but love physics, so please excuse my ignorance; but what is the electrical potential energy (not the equation; but the definition)? And why do you get it when you multiply the charges by k and divide by r? What does that really mean? How can you get the electrical potential energy by doing that? And what is it used for? Again, forgive my ignorance. Thanks.
-Mike
 
I'll try to give you a little more useful answer. Let's define some axioms that should be obvious:
1) The electric potential energy has to depend on the sizes of both charges: U=U(q1,q2)
2) The energy doesn't care which charge you label 1 or 2: U(q1,q2)=U(q2,q1)
3) If there is only one charge, there's no potential energy: U(q1,0)=0
4) Experimentally, electrostatics is linear. Dealing with many particles is essentially the same as dealing with two: U(q1+q1',q2)=U(q1,q2)+U(q1',q2)

All of these statements have physical meaning, but they imply that U(q1,q2)=cq1q2, where c is some constant (k/r here). So you're right that multiplication is a specific type of mixture.

Rahmuss, do you know what potential energy is (non electric)? If not, I think its too involved to describe here (sorry).
 
<<<1) The electric potential energy has to depend on the sizes of both charges: U=U(q1,q2)>>> Right
<<<2) The energy doesn't care which charge you label 1 or 2: U(q1,q2)=U(q2,q1)>>> Makes Sense. As long as you're not mixing systems of energy.
<<<3) If there is only one charge, there's no potential energy: U(q1,0)=0>>> Sounds Right.
<<<4) Experimentally, electrostatics is linear. Dealing with many particles is essentially the same as dealing with two: U(q1+q1',q2)=U(q1,q2)+U(q1',q2)>>> Ok. I'll trust you.

All of these statements have physical meaning, but they imply that U(q1,q2)=cq1q2, where c is some constant (k/r here). So you're right that multiplication is a specific type of mixture.

Rahmuss, do you know what potential energy is (non electric)? If not, I think its too involved to describe here (sorry). Yep; but just the basics. I know that an object has PE (V with hamiltonian isn't it?) when it is has a force acting on it (such as an object at the top of a slide with gravity acting on it), and it's the same with particles (just different variables to express similar attributes) with charges. The q+ acting on the q- and vice versa, therefore, there is a potential energy that increases and they get closer. I just don't understand physics like I'd like to. I guess I'm just looking for a deeper meaning.
 
The energy of a particle or system of particles derived from position, or condition, rather than motion. A raised weight, coiled spring, or charged battery has potential energy. I think of it in biological terms, such as the energy stored for later use has potential-which will be used later as active energy. Correct me if I'm wrong guys, but the biological term would be significantly the same as the physical term potential.
 
Means in relations unit

The phys means are in relations unit some times, naturely, the * ? and another calculation is mean in some concept. but it isn't a unit.
a complete unit mean in phys is important.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
29K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K