| Thread Closed |
Pretty woman ... Yeah, yeah, yeah! |
Share Thread |
| Dec11-03, 04:14 PM | #1 |
|
|
Pretty woman ... Yeah, yeah, yeah! |
| Dec11-03, 05:27 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Dec11-03, 07:03 PM | #3 |
|
|
In men, at least, visual stimulus seems to be hooked directly into deeper behavior sections of the brain. I have posted before my own crank theory why this might be so, and certainly the porn industry would suggest it is true.
So it may be irrational, but it's not unexpected, that men would start courting behavior ("money to impress...") based on nothing more than a picture. |
| Dec17-03, 02:21 AM | #4 |
|
|
Pretty woman ... Yeah, yeah, yeah!
Well, according to Professor J. Philippe Rushton (http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/rushton.html), Northern men court women through their show of social status and money, while the women show off their sexuality. In other words, Northern men want looks, Northern women want money/social social status/intelligence.
But, Rushton says that equitorial men attract women by showing off their muscles, penis size, and athletic ability, while equitorial women are the same as Northen women, or something like that. The evolutionary explanation for this is that in equitorial regions, high intelligence was not really needed to reproduce successfully, but in the North, larger brains were needed to figure out how to find shelter, make clothing, find food. Women were better off choosing intelligence over strength in the North. Plus, tribes were highly separated from each other in the North; finding shelter and food was more of a problem than fighting rival tribes. But inter-tribal conflict was much more of a problem in equitorial regions, such as in Africa and the Middle East. Here, strenth to fight off rival tribes was more important. Of course, though the above is the natural inclinations of people, it is possible to resist such urges and make wiser reproductive choices. I am part of an equitorial race and I am always thinking about female's naked bodies, but since I am a eugenicist, I will only reproduce with a female with good genetic stock (high intelligence, good behavioral traits, no genetic diseases) and sooth my sexual desires via masturbation. Carlos Hernandez |
| Dec17-03, 09:26 AM | #5 |
|
|
Forgive me, but the professor's explanation strike me as self indulgent fanasizing; just-so stories in fact.
As to your eugenic concerns, have you found anyone who measures up? Would you accept a woman who met your IQ and health constraints, but was of another race? Remember, you can't affect the population quality of the future if you don't reporduce! |
| Dec17-03, 12:08 PM | #6 |
|
|
This seems to perpetuate the myth that women don't care about what a guy looks like. Before you even have any chance with a woman, you have to pass her physical attraction test, at least in the beginning.
|
| Dec17-03, 12:19 PM | #7 |
|
|
It's usually "common sense" that women are not as concerned about looks as are men -- I don't have any real numbers to back it up, but it sure does seem to be true in my experience. (Hey, don't throw any tomatoes!)
In fact, I once saw a website gallery of photographs of beautiful women with horrifically ugly boyfriends. Yes, women do generally care about whether or not a man is attractive -- but much less so than men care about whether or not a woman is attractive. - Warren |
| Dec17-03, 01:33 PM | #8 |
|
|
With regards to race, I am only attracted to East Asians, Whites, and Hispanic women. Carlos Hernandez |
| Dec17-03, 01:39 PM | #9 |
|
|
Carlos Hernandez |
| Dec17-03, 01:41 PM | #10 |
|
|
Second, such things as number of offspring desired is something we must agree to before getting married. If we have different idealist viewpoints, we would not get married. Carlos Hernandez |
| Dec17-03, 01:46 PM | #11 |
|
|
B) You don't date much, do ya? - Warren |
| Dec17-03, 02:04 PM | #12 |
|
|
Carlos Hernandez |
| Dec17-03, 02:05 PM | #13 |
|
|
I don't recall engaging in a debate. I recall making fun of you for your views on the utility of women.
- Warren |
| Dec17-03, 02:08 PM | #14 |
|
|
Second, I consider both males and females as utilitarian objects. I am a pragmatist and stoic, you obviously are a sentimentalist. To each his own. Carlos Hernandez |
| Dec17-03, 02:13 PM | #15 |
|
|
- Warren |
| Dec17-03, 02:30 PM | #16 |
|
|
|
| Dec17-03, 02:34 PM | #17 |
|
|
red herring. More details at http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html But, if you would like to change the topic to sexual practices of both individual and groups, perhaps at the level of differential psychology, I can start a new thread. Charlos Hernandez |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Pretty woman ... Yeah, yeah, yeah!
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| 'yeah' instead of 'yes'! | General Discussion | 16 | ||
| Yeah but how often? | General Discussion | 16 | ||
| yeah I'm a dummy I know... | Quantum Physics | 1 | ||
| integrals, oh yeah...... | Introductory Physics Homework | 6 | ||
| Gre Yeah | Academic Guidance | 1 | ||