Collisions problem (How should I approach it)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a collisions problem involving the conservation of linear momentum and kinetic energy. The original poster is attempting to analyze the scenario presented in a problem from a professor's exam, focusing on the interactions between two blocks during a collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers using conservation laws but encounters three unknowns. They question whether to apply conservation of kinetic energy and momentum simultaneously and express confusion regarding the final collision dynamics.
  • Another participant provides equations based on momentum and energy conservation, leading to a discussion about the sign convention for velocities.
  • There is a query regarding the negative sign used for one of the velocities in the momentum equation, indicating a need for clarification on the assumptions made.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with a specific problem context that includes assumptions about the initial conditions of the blocks and the nature of their collision. The original poster has noted the challenge of dealing with multiple unknowns in their analysis.

Hindi
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I came across a problem on collisions on one of my professors old exams. The problem is:

http://home.comcast.net/~msharma15/problem_2.jpg

The way I am trying to approach it is by applying the conservation of linear momentum and energy, but the problem is that I still get left with 3 unknowns.

Here is what I know:
Before the collision, only block A has kinetic energy.

After the collision, the K.E. of system is (1/2 K.E. initial). block A has -1/2MV^2[/color] and block B has 1/2MV^2[/color].

The final collision is what confuses me. Should I just work with K.E.i (only block A moving) with conservation of linear momentum?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
by cons of p,
[tex]m_1v_{1i}=m_1v_{1f}-m_2v_{2f}[/tex]
where v_2f is reckoned as negative
By the energy conditions,
[tex]m_1v_{1i}^2=\frac {1}{2}(m_1v_{1f}^2+m_2v_{2f}^2)[/tex]
which gives two equations with two unknowns.
 
Thanks for the reply
StephenPrivitera. I am just wondering why you made m_2v_2f negative in the first equation?? Should it be the other way around?
 
The equations should be:
[tex]m_1v_{1i}=-m_1v_{1f}+m_2v_{2f}[/tex]
[tex]\frac {1}{4}m_1v_{1i}^2=\frac {1}{2}(m_1v_{1f}^2+m_2v_{2f}^2)[/tex]
(where the speeds are all positive)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K