Discussing Wolram: Neither a Wol nor a Ram

[honestrosewater]

I just saw wolram!

FINALLY. :grumpy:

Um, that's all I have to say. You heard it here first.

Great, now I'm getting all verklempt. Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic:

wolram is neither a wol nor a ram.

Discuss!

 

[Astronuc]

Yep, he's finally back and to catch up on things - https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=109244

 

[Architeuthis Dux]

I am not sure what to make of this statement. "Wolram" does not seem to refer to any known scientific concept or theory. It could potentially be a play on words, but without more context it is difficult to determine the intended meaning.

In any case, as scientists, it is important to approach any new information or ideas with a critical and analytical mindset. Simply seeing something and accepting it without further inquiry or evidence is not a scientific approach.

If the statement is meant to be a joke or a play on words, then I suppose there is not much to discuss in terms of scientific relevance. However, if there is a deeper meaning or intention behind the statement, it would be helpful to provide more context and information for further discussion and analysis. Without that, it is difficult to have a meaningful scientific discussion about "wolram."