is an electron everywhere at once?


by steersman
Tags: electron
steersman
steersman is offline
#1
Dec25-03, 12:44 AM
steersman's Avatar
P: 47
Is an electron everywhere at once within a waveform?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Scientists observe quantum superconductor-metal transition and superconducting glass
New technique detects microscopic diabetes-related eye damage
steersman
steersman is offline
#2
Dec25-03, 01:07 AM
steersman's Avatar
P: 47
and what about a photon?
MathematicalPhysicist
MathematicalPhysicist is offline
#3
Dec25-03, 03:33 AM
P: 3,173
it's probablity dictates the electron to be in other places rather than the one observed by the experiment, the experiment affects the state of an electron (which is in a superposition).

steersman
steersman is offline
#4
Dec25-03, 03:57 AM
steersman's Avatar
P: 47

is an electron everywhere at once?


cheers loop
Tom Mattson
Tom Mattson is offline
#5
Dec25-03, 11:50 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Tom Mattson's Avatar
P: 5,540
Originally posted by steersman
Is an electron everywhere at once within a waveform?

and what about a photon?
That cannot be said with any certainty. It is just one untestable interpretation of quantum theory, and I for one am inclined to think it is false.

Check out this thread by loop quantum gravity:

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthr...&threadid=9661
dlgoff
dlgoff is offline
#6
Dec25-03, 01:48 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
dlgoff's Avatar
P: 2,631
Originally posted by steersman
Is an electron everywhere at once within a waveform?
When bound in an atom their location can be narrowed to a probability density distribution depending on its energy state. However, within the distributions, HUP still applies.

Corrections encourged.
Tom Mattson
Tom Mattson is offline
#7
Dec25-03, 05:35 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Tom Mattson's Avatar
P: 5,540
Originally posted by dlgoff
When bound in an atom their location can be narrowed to a probability density distribution depending on its energy state. However, within the distributions, HUP still applies.

Corrections encourged.
The probability distributions are infinite in extent, so saying that the HUP applies "within the distributions" is just another way of saying that the HUP applies everywhere.
Thallium
Thallium is offline
#8
Dec26-03, 03:22 PM
P: 263
Isn't this related to Schrödinger's cat mystery?
dlgoff
dlgoff is offline
#9
Dec26-03, 04:02 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
dlgoff's Avatar
P: 2,631
The probability distributions are infinite in extent...
Tom,

So even as part of an atom, the electrons probability distribution is everywhere? What about the wave equation solutions for the hydrogen atom for example. I thought that they described various symetrical distribution patterns that are localized (i.e. depending on the its quantum numbers).
Tom Mattson
Tom Mattson is offline
#10
Dec26-03, 04:55 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Tom Mattson's Avatar
P: 5,540
Originally posted by dlgoff
So even as part of an atom, the electrons probability distribution is everywhere?
Yes.

What about the wave equation solutions for the hydrogen atom for example.
Take a look at the solutions. They only go to zero asymptotically, at infinity. That means they are nonzero everywhere.

I thought that they described various symetrical distribution patterns that are localized (i.e. depending on the its quantum numbers).
You probably got that impression from looking at those famous 3d polar plots of atomic orbitals, that seem to have definite cutoff points. The thing is, those pictures are generated by imposing a cutoff. That is, they determine the orbital which contains, say, the innermost 90-95% of the probability density, and draw that. To go to 100% would require an infinite amount of space.

The atomic electrons are "localized" only in the sense that their probability densities approach zero as r approaches infinity. The only way to truly localize a particle to a finite region of space is to confine it in a potential well whose walls are infinitely high (on the energy axis). This, of course, is not physically realizable.
Tom Mattson
Tom Mattson is offline
#11
Dec26-03, 04:58 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Tom Mattson's Avatar
P: 5,540
Originally posted by Thallium
Isn't this related to Schrödinger's cat mystery?
Yes. The idea is that you do not know exactly where the electron is until you measure it. Since you can only know the result of a measurement, it leaves open the (untestable) interpretation that, inbetween measurements, the electron can be in more than one place at a time, though it does not imply that. The absurdity of such a position was highlighted by Schrodinger with a "quantum cat" that was at once, both dead and alive.
Thallium
Thallium is offline
#12
Dec27-03, 06:37 AM
P: 263
Originally posted by Tom
Yes. The idea is that you do not know exactly where the electron is until you measure it. Since you can only know the result of a measurement, it leaves open the (untestable) interpretation that, inbetween measurements, the electron can be in more than one place at a time, though it does not imply that. The absurdity of such a position was highlighted by Schrodinger with a "quantum cat" that was at once, both dead and alive.
I read an article a few months ago about this "riddle". Sir Roger Penrose wanted to prove that Schrödinger was right. That an electron can be in two places at once. To me however, this sounds more like a metaphysical idea.
dlgoff
dlgoff is offline
#13
Dec27-03, 05:17 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
dlgoff's Avatar
P: 2,631
...3d polar plots of atomic orbitals, that seem to have definite cutoff points. ...they determine the orbital which contains, say, the innermost 90-95% of the probability density,...
Thanks Tom. I should have thought before asking. But I'm glad I did since you have explained very well whats going on.

Thanks again,
pelastration
pelastration is offline
#14
Dec27-03, 06:01 PM
pelastration's Avatar
P: 515
Originally posted by Thallium
To me however, this sounds more like a metaphysical idea.
Maybe Penrose looks for such explanation to prove some of his metaphysical ideas. It shows that measurement problems of an (egocentrical) observer influences his general perception of the reality of the world. The same absurdity is like some people say that the tree that falls in the wood without an observer doesn't makes a sound.
Thallium
Thallium is offline
#15
Dec28-03, 09:56 AM
P: 263
Originally posted by pelastration
The same absurdity is like some people say that the tree that falls in the wood without an observer doesn't makes a sound.
That sounds more like surrealistic poetry[:)]
notwithstanding
notwithstanding is offline
#16
Jan5-04, 07:20 PM
P: 11
Originally posted by Tom
Yes. The idea is that you do not know exactly where the electron is until you measure it. Since you can only know the result of a measurement, it leaves open the (untestable) interpretation that, inbetween measurements, the electron can be in more than one place at a time, though it does not imply that. The absurdity of such a position was highlighted by Schrodinger with a "quantum cat" that was at once, both dead and alive.
Penrose misinterprets the frequency of the particle with the particle itself. Notwithstanding any logic to the contrary.
DrChinese
DrChinese is offline
#17
Jan5-04, 07:42 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
DrChinese's Avatar
P: 5,146
Originally posted by pelastration
The same absurdity is like some people say that the tree that falls in the wood without an observer doesn't makes a sound.
Doesn't seem all that absurd, really. No different really than the Aspect experiments. I.e. assuming that quantum particles have discrete values when not being watched, which we now know cannot be demonstrated. I would call that the equivalent of the tree in the forest, what would you call it?
pallidin
pallidin is offline
#18
Jan7-04, 04:33 PM
P: 2,292
A moon-sized asteroid crashing into an earth-like planet 100 million light years away makes a hell-of-a huge sound in that local environment, regardless of whether or not anyone observes it.
Prove that wrong.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
how we can measure the speed of the electron in an electric field General Physics 2
Differences between free electron model and nearly free electron model Advanced Physics Homework 0
Electron Density vs Electron Density Difference Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 4
Electron Proton Collisions and Electron Capture Introductory Physics Homework 1
Electron-Electron Correlations Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1