How to Convert Cartesian Navier-Stokes to Cylindrical/Spherical Coordinates?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on converting the Cartesian form of the Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations to cylindrical and spherical coordinates. The key equations derived are: for cylindrical coordinates, v_x = v_r cos(θ) - v_θ sin(θ) and v_y = v_r sin(θ) + v_θ cos(θ); for spherical coordinates, v_x = v_r sin(θ) cos(φ) - v_θ cos(θ) cos(φ) + v_φ sin(φ) and v_y = v_r sin(θ) sin(φ) - v_θ cos(θ) sin(φ) - v_φ cos(φ). These transformations are essential for fluid dynamics applications in non-Cartesian systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Navier-Stokes equations
  • Familiarity with cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of vector components in different coordinate systems
  • Basic trigonometry (sine and cosine functions)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn about the application of Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the transformation of vector fields between coordinate systems
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving PDEs in non-Cartesian coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Fluid dynamics researchers, mechanical engineers, and students studying advanced fluid mechanics who need to apply Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems.

sam2
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to understand how to convert the cartesian form of the N-S equation to cylinderical/spherical form. Rather than re-derive the equation for spherical/cylindrical systems, I am trying to directly convert the cartesian PDE.

I'm ok with converting the d/dx and d2/dx2 terms. What I am struggling with a little, is the v_x, v_y and v_z terms which represent velocity in the x, y and z directions respectively.

Start simple with cylindrical...

Any idea on how to represent v_x and v_y in terms of v_r and v_theta?

I make v_r to be v_x / cos(theta). But can't see how to find v_theta. Any help is much appreciated.

Regards,

Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas at all?

Thanks,

Sam
 


Hi Sam,

Converting the cartesian form of the Navier-Stokes equation to cylindrical or spherical form can be a bit tricky, but it is definitely doable. First, let's start with the cylindrical form. The x, y, and z directions in cartesian coordinates correspond to r, θ, and z directions in cylindrical coordinates. So, we can represent v_x and v_y in terms of v_r and v_θ as follows:

v_x = v_r cos(θ) - v_θ sin(θ)
v_y = v_r sin(θ) + v_θ cos(θ)

To understand why this is the case, think about the components of velocity in the x and y directions. The x component (v_x) is related to the radial direction (v_r) and the tangential direction (v_θ). Similarly, the y component (v_y) is related to the radial direction and the tangential direction, but with a rotation of 90 degrees. This is why we have the cos(θ) and sin(θ) terms in the equations above.

For the spherical form, the x, y, and z directions correspond to r, θ, and φ directions. Again, we can represent v_x and v_y in terms of v_r, v_θ, and v_φ as follows:

v_x = v_r sin(θ) cos(φ) - v_θ cos(θ) cos(φ) + v_φ sin(φ)
v_y = v_r sin(θ) sin(φ) - v_θ cos(θ) sin(φ) - v_φ cos(φ)

To understand this representation, think about the components of velocity in the x and y directions in spherical coordinates. The x component (v_x) is related to the radial direction (v_r), the meridional direction (v_θ), and the azimuthal direction (v_φ). Similarly, the y component (v_y) is related to these three directions, but with different combinations of sin and cos functions to account for the different orientations.

I hope this helps you understand how to convert the cartesian form of the Navier-Stokes equation to cylindrical and spherical forms. Good luck with your studies!


 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K