What Happens to the Force at Gear Gang Limit?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pallidin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Gear Limit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a gear train, specifically focusing on the implications of cascading gear ratios on force and torque. Participants explore the effects of friction and the limits of gear arrangements, questioning what happens to force as it is reduced through successive gears.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a gear arrangement where a 10:1 gear ratio results in increased speed but reduced force, leading to concerns about the ability to turn subsequent gears.
  • Another participant questions the initial setup, suggesting that the gear arrangement may lead to issues with small gears and static friction, which could prevent movement.
  • A later reply asserts that friction losses in the gear arrangement will eventually require more torque to turn the gears than what the motor can provide.
  • Another participant clarifies that force is not conserved and suggests that the discussion may be conflating force with energy, emphasizing that static friction will ultimately stop the gears when the force is insufficient.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanics of the gear train, particularly regarding the role of friction and the nature of force versus energy. There is no consensus on the exact implications of the cascading gear ratios.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential for friction to complicate the operation of the gear train, but the specific assumptions regarding gear sizes and configurations remain unresolved.

pallidin
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
3
This problem is bugging me, and I know that those far more knowlegable than I can help lift me out of my ignorance:

I have a gear on a spindle which has a 10:1 ratio with respect to the spindle(armature)
When I spin the armature at 1 mph, the outside diameter of the gear spins at 10 mph, but with a 10 times reduction in force.
The gear and armature has "teeth"
I now connect a second gear, such to where the first gear turns the armature of the second, identical gear.
The second gears' outer rotation is now 100 times that of the initial input. 100 times the speed, 100 times less force.
If I continue this ganged arrangement, a point in time will occur when the continually reduced force is not sufficient to even turn the next gear.
What happens to this force?
Is it dissipated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd like to help you out, but I don't quite follow. Are you saying that you have a driven gear (pinion) that begins a gear train and that each successive gear in the train gives a 10x reduction in torque? With such a gear train, you will quickly run into a problem with the existence of a small enough gear: say the pinion has 100 teeth, then the next gear has 10 teeth, then the next gear has only 1 tooth and we're in trouble.

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding and you're talking about some kind of planetary gear arrangement where you have a sun gear with, say 100 teeth, and a number of planet gears around it, each with 10 teeth. If that's what you're talking about, then the gear ratios will not multiply; each planet will have the same 10:1 reduction. Note that I am not talking about your typical epicyclic gear train here, where you also have an external ring gear as the output gear; the axes for these planets is fixed in space (at least I'm guessing that might be what you mean).

Anyway, if you have a gear train that will not move, the likely culprit is friction. (your input force will be eqilibrated by static friction in the train) Since friction (and inertia, for that matter) reflects back through a gear train with a factor of the gear ratio squared, it will actually be easier to drive the big gear than the small gear.

I hope somehting in there is intelligible/helpful.
 
Originally posted by pallidin
If I continue this ganged arrangement, a point in time will occur when the continually reduced force is not sufficient to even turn the next gear.
What happens to this force?
Is it dissipated?
Yes, there are friction losses in any gear arrangement and eventually you'll end up with more torque required to turn the gears than your motor generates.
 
Originally posted by pallidin
What happens to this force?
Is it dissipated?
Force is not a conserved quantity. Maybe your mixing "force" and "energy" together in your mind.

Eventually, the last gear in the chain will be "heavier" than the reduced force supplied. This "weight" will most likely be do to the friction between the teeth of two gears in contact. The gears will eventually stop, and remain stopped, because the static frictional force of the teeth exceeds the provided force that has been reduced.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K