| Thread Closed |
problem with Probabilistic |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug7-06, 02:08 PM | #1 |
|
|
problem with Probabilistic
I mean if you define the n-th momentum of a probability distribution:
[tex] <x^n > = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx P(x) x^n [/tex] (1) then my question is about the function P(x) (probability distribution) when:[tex] P(x)=e^{-af(x) } [/tex] where a is a constant (real or complex) -if f(x) is f(x)=x^2 then you have a "Gaussian" for a>0 and you can obtain every moment using (1) - if f(x) is any function and a>0 ,a-->oo (big) you can use "Saddle-point approximation". -the question is how can you handle if P(x) is of the form: [tex] P(x)=x^2 + \alpha g(x) [/tex] where "alpha" is an small coupling constant so you could expand [tex] exp(\alpha g(x) ) [/tex] and take only a few terms in that case i think you can take: [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx P(x) = \sum_ n a(n) <x^n > [/tex] |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: problem with Probabilistic
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| What is Probabilistic number theory , could we rely on it ? | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 1 | ||
| Probabilistic complexity classes and acceptable sources of entropy | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 0 | ||
| Introduction to Measurement in the Physics Laboratory: A Probabilistic Approach | Introductory Physics Learning Materials | 0 | ||
| Is the nature of physics more probabilistic or deterministic? | General Discussion | 9 | ||
| Are probabilistic theories necessarily falsifiable? | General Discussion | 7 | ||