Poincare Hypothesis Proof (Maybe?)


by climbhi
Tags: hypothesis, poincare, proof
climbhi
#1
Apr17-03, 08:30 PM
P: n/a
The New York Times did an article today about a Russian mathemetician who claims to have proved the Poincare Hypothesis. In good Andrew Wiles fashion his proof is actually much further reaching results with the actuall proof of Poincare's Hypothesis dropping out of the larger result. Thought you might want to check it out: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/15/science/15MATH.html
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Researchers help Boston Marathon organizers plan for 2014 race
'Math detective' analyzes odds for suspicious lottery wins
Pseudo-mathematics and financial charlatanism
Brad_Ad23
Brad_Ad23 is offline
#2
Apr17-03, 08:39 PM
P: 499
excellent
climbhi
#3
Apr17-03, 09:44 PM
P: n/a
This article talked a little about Andrew Wiles proof of FLT too. It mentioned that a flaw was found in it and that he worked for months to fix it with one of his students. I've heard all sorts of things about Andrew Wiles's proof. So maybe some one can set the record straight for me. Is Andrew Wiles's proof of FLT considered valid today, or is it still thought of as flawed?

suffian
#4
Apr18-03, 12:55 AM
P: n/a

Poincare Hypothesis Proof (Maybe?)


it's valid today. he did fix it.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis General Math 15
Proof of Poincare Recurrence Theorem Classical Physics 3
Hypothesis in proof Calculus & Beyond Homework 14
Proof of Riemann Hypothesis? Linear & Abstract Algebra 2