Why do you refuse to consider new evidence and advancements in science?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ingvar Astrand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the censorship of alternative scientific theories, specifically regarding Ingvar Astrand's unified physics theory presented in various international conferences. Astrand expresses frustration over the perceived suppression of his ideas within the Physics Forums, particularly in relation to the Big Bang Theory. The forum moderator clarifies that while alternative theories are welcome, they must be presented in designated sections, and emphasizes that established theories like the Big Bang are upheld through rigorous scrutiny and evidence-based challenges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Big Bang Theory and its significance in modern cosmology.
  • Familiarity with scientific discourse and the structure of academic forums.
  • Knowledge of unified physics concepts and their implications in theoretical physics.
  • Experience in presenting scientific theories and engaging in peer discussions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the guidelines for presenting alternative theories in academic forums.
  • Explore the principles of unified physics and its current standing in scientific communities.
  • Learn about the peer review process and its role in validating scientific theories.
  • Investigate the historical context and criticisms of the Big Bang Theory.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and science communicators interested in the dynamics of scientific debate and the presentation of alternative theories within academic settings.

Ingvar Astrand
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
To the mentor-censor

Why do you forbid research reports about empirical discoveries that by scientific derivations give other results than the conspired consensus?

Why do you not let your members discuss the science without censoring?

What I would like to tell more about is the unified physics that I have derived and got accepted and given lectures at conferences in universities in USA (Connecticut 2000) and Russia St.-Petersburg 2002 and Kazan 2003 (plenary-lecture), Paris UNESCO 2002 (poster-session).

Why do you try to stop the truth and the development of science?
You can do it here on your debatepage, but there are other ways for the true science. What you do is that you support lies and delays

Ingvar Astrand, Sweden
ingvar_astrand@hotmail.com
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Take a deep breath, Ingvar. Your ideas are not being censored.

You inserted your theory into a discussion about redshift with respect to the Big Bang model. As a general policy, if members wish to present their own theories, it is done in the https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=1000&forumid=12". Your post is still there now awaiting further discussion. What happened was that I split out your post to create its own topic/thread (which worked fine) and keep the rest of that redshift topic here (which didn't work...I accidentally/unfortunately lost that bit...sorry, marcus, you posted from great info there).

And yes, Big Bang Theory has pride of place in this forum. Deservedly so. Discussions of alternative theories are welcome at Physics Forums in their proper place. If you fear that your ideas will be lost in the Theory Development forum, you can include a link to your topic in a relevant ongoing thread in this forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It takes more than conspiracy allegations to overturn an accepted scientific theory. We'd be happy to examine any evidence you might have. Indeed, it is only by withstanding such powerful challenges that a theory becomes so well accepted. Your other post however contained only assertions and no arguments, so there was nothing to respond to.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Graduate Is Redshift Really Proof of Universe Expansion?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K